• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥斯陆研究:饮食与戒烟建议。中年男性5年初级预防试验的更多结果。

The Oslo Study: diet and antismoking advice. Additional results from a 5-year primary preventive trial in middle-aged men.

作者信息

Holme I, Hjermann I, Helgeland A, Leren P

出版信息

Prev Med. 1985 May;14(3):279-92. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90057-x.

DOI:10.1016/0091-7435(85)90057-x
PMID:3903733
Abstract

In this randomized, primary prevention trial of 1,232 high-risk, middle-aged Oslo men, advice during 5 years about diet and smoking brought about a significant reduction (47%) in incidence of first major coronary heart disease (CHD) events in the intervention group compared with controls. Data are presented indicating that the net difference of 10% in serum cholesterol between groups was the main cause for this achievement and that the antismoking factor, due to a rather small net difference in quit rates (17 and 24% in control and intervention groups, respectively), contributed to a lesser degree. Analysis of social class reveals that the favorable results in the intervention group were present in all social strata, despite the unexpected finding that lower class men experienced a lower CHD incidence than men of higher socioeconomic status. Antismoking advice was especially effective in lower class intervention group men. Among cigarette quitters, lower social class men reduced their serum cholesterol more than higher social class men. However, for the total intervention group, higher status men had at least as great a reduction in serum cholesterol as did lower status men. With endpoint follow-up extended to 8.5-10 years, additional cases of CHD (nonfatal and fatal myocardial infarction and sudden death) numbered 7 and 10 in the intervention and control groups, respectively; CHD cases throughout the trial totaled 25 and 45 (P approximately equal to 0.02). Total deaths numbered 19 and 31, respectively (P approximately equal to 0.05).

摘要

在这项针对1232名高危中年奥斯陆男性的随机初级预防试验中,与对照组相比,干预组在5年时间里接受的饮食和吸烟建议使首次重大冠心病(CHD)事件的发生率显著降低(47%)。所呈现的数据表明,两组之间血清胆固醇10%的净差异是这一成果的主要原因,而戒烟因素由于戒烟率的净差异较小(对照组和干预组分别为17%和24%),贡献程度较小。社会阶层分析显示,尽管有意外发现,即下层社会男性的冠心病发病率低于社会经济地位较高的男性,但干预组在所有社会阶层中都取得了良好效果。戒烟建议在下层社会干预组男性中尤其有效。在戒烟者中,下层社会男性比上层社会男性降低血清胆固醇的幅度更大。然而,对于整个干预组来说,较高地位男性的血清胆固醇降低幅度至少与较低地位男性一样大。将终点随访延长至8.5 - 10年,干预组和对照组新增冠心病病例(非致命和致命性心肌梗死及猝死)分别为7例和10例;整个试验中的冠心病病例总数分别为25例和45例(P约等于0.02)。总死亡人数分别为19例和31例(P约等于0.05)。

相似文献

1
The Oslo Study: diet and antismoking advice. Additional results from a 5-year primary preventive trial in middle-aged men.奥斯陆研究:饮食与戒烟建议。中年男性5年初级预防试验的更多结果。
Prev Med. 1985 May;14(3):279-92. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90057-x.
2
Oslo Study Diet and Antismoking Trial. Results after 102 months.奥斯陆研究饮食与戒烟试验。102个月后的结果。
Am J Med. 1986 Feb 14;80(2A):7-11. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90154-3.
3
Effect of diet and smoking intervention on the incidence of coronary heart disease. Report from the Oslo Study Group of a randomised trial in healthy men.饮食与吸烟干预对冠心病发病率的影响。奥斯陆健康男性随机试验研究小组的报告。
Lancet. 1981 Dec 12;2(8259):1303-10. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)91338-6.
4
Effect of dietary and antismoking advice on the incidence of myocardial infarction: a 16-year follow-up of the Oslo Diet and Antismoking Study after its close.饮食及戒烟建议对心肌梗死发病率的影响:奥斯陆饮食与戒烟研究结束后的16年随访
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006 Jul;16(5):330-8. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.04.007. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
5
Coronary heart disease and all-causes mortality in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: subgroup findings and comparisons with other trials.多重危险因素干预试验中的冠心病与全因死亡率:亚组研究结果及与其他试验的比较
Prev Med. 1985 May;14(3):293-311. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90058-1.
6
On the separation of the intervention effects of diet and antismoking advice on the incidence of major coronary events in coronary high risk men. The Oslo Study.
J Oslo City Hosp. 1982 Mar-Apr;32(3-4):31-54.
7
Prevention of coronary heart disease: some results from the Oslo secondary and primary intervention studies.冠心病的预防:奥斯陆二级和一级干预研究的一些结果。
J Am Coll Nutr. 1989 Oct;8(5):407-10. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1989.10720315.
8
Coronary heart disease death, nonfatal acute myocardial infarction and other clinical outcomes in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group.多重危险因素干预试验中的冠心病死亡、非致死性急性心肌梗死及其他临床结局。多重危险因素干预试验研究组
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jul 1;58(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90232-8.
9
Multiple risk factor intervention in coronary heart disease.冠心病的多重危险因素干预
Ciba Found Symp. 1985;110:110-25. doi: 10.1002/9780470720912.ch8.
10
Eight-year follow-up results from the Rome Project of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention. Research Group of the Rome Project of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention.
Prev Med. 1986 Mar;15(2):176-91. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(86)90087-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of research on cigarette smoking in Preventive Medicine in recognition of the journal's 50th anniversary.预防医学领域中关于吸烟问题的研究综述,以庆祝该杂志创刊 50 周年。
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107335. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107335. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
Credibility of subgroup analyses by socioeconomic status in public health intervention evaluations: An underappreciated problem?公共卫生干预评估中按社会经济地位进行亚组分析的可信度:一个未得到充分重视的问题?
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Oct 19;6:245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.09.010. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact.
促进健康饮食的干预措施对所有人都同样有效吗?对影响方面社会经济不平等的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 2;15:457. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1781-7.
4
Effect of screening and lifestyle counselling on incidence of ischaemic heart disease in general population: Inter99 randomised trial.筛查和生活方式咨询对一般人群中缺血性心脏病发病率的影响:Inter99 随机试验。
BMJ. 2014 Jun 9;348:g3617. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3617.
5
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.用于冠心病一级预防的多重危险因素干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD001561. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001561.pub3.
6
Surgeons underestimate their patients' desire for preoperative information.外科医生低估了患者对术前信息的需求。
World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):964-70. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9581-1.
7
Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.用于冠心病一级预防的多重危险因素干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD001561. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001561.pub2.
8
Dietary advice given by a dietitian versus other health professional or self-help resources to reduce blood cholesterol.营养师给出的与其他健康专业人士或自助资源相比的降低血液胆固醇的饮食建议。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2003(1):CD001366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001366.
9
Number needed to screen: development of a statistic for disease screening.需筛查人数:一种用于疾病筛查的统计量的开发。
BMJ. 1998 Aug 1;317(7154):307-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7154.307.
10
North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management angina. North of England Stable Angina Guideline Development Group.英格兰北部循证指南制定项目:初级保健管理心绞痛循证指南概要版。英格兰北部稳定性心绞痛指南制定小组。
BMJ. 1996 Mar 30;312(7034):827-32.