• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国住院医师执业现状及影响工作满意度的因素

Current Status of Hospitalist Practice and Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction in Korea.

作者信息

Song Song Yi, Han Hee Youn, Park Se Yoon, Kim Jaewoong, Park Kyung Mee, Kyong Taeyoung

机构信息

Department of Hospital Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(2):302-308. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08910-8. Epub 2024 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08910-8
PMID:39037519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11803046/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the roles and responsibilities of hospitalists have grown considerably in recent years, research on the current job status and satisfaction levels of Korean hospitalists is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We investigate the present state of Korean hospitalists and the factors influencing their job satisfaction 6 years after the pilot program's launch.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional analysis was based on an online survey conducted from January 30 to February 18, 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

Korean hospitalists (N = 303) MAIN MEASURES: The survey encompassed participant demographics, hospital information, education, clinical practice, research involvement, and job satisfaction. We employed multiple logistic regression analyses to identify determinants of satisfaction as a hospitalist.

KEY RESULTS

The analysis was based on 79 hospitalists' responses (response rate 26%). Respondents had a median age of 39 years; approximately half were male internal medicine specialists, possessing over 3 years of hospitalist experience. Most respondents were interested in clinical work (94.4%), with only 21.5% interested in research and evidence-based medicine. Over two-thirds indicated that non-clinical duties occupied less than 20% of their time. Overall, job satisfaction among hospitalists averaged 51.9%. Notably, the availability of a research mentor was significantly associated with job satisfaction (P = .011). While hospitalists with more than 3 years of experience, more hospitalists per facility, and autonomy were associated with increased job satisfaction, these associations were not statistically significant. Furthermore, there was no association between night shift work, work type, or work hours and job satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Korean hospitalists primarily focus on clinical practice, our study underscores the positive impact of mentorship from research mentors on job satisfaction, supported by comprehensive univariate and multivariate analyses. These findings signal a progressive transformation in the role of Korean hospitalists, as they increasingly engage in research alongside patient care.

摘要

背景

尽管近年来住院医师的角色和职责有了显著增长,但关于韩国住院医师当前工作状况和满意度水平的研究却很匮乏。

目的

我们调查了试点项目启动6年后韩国住院医师的现状以及影响他们工作满意度的因素。

设计

本横断面分析基于2023年1月30日至2月18日进行的一项在线调查。

参与者

韩国住院医师(N = 303)主要测量指标:该调查涵盖参与者的人口统计学信息、医院信息、教育背景、临床实践、研究参与情况以及工作满意度。我们采用多元逻辑回归分析来确定作为住院医师满意度的决定因素。

关键结果

分析基于79名住院医师的回复(回复率26%)。受访者的年龄中位数为39岁;约一半是男性内科专科医生,拥有超过3年的住院医师经验。大多数受访者对临床工作感兴趣(94.4%),只有21.5%对研究和循证医学感兴趣。超过三分之二的人表示非临床职责占用他们的时间不到20%。总体而言,住院医师的工作满意度平均为51.9%。值得注意的是,有研究导师与工作满意度显著相关(P = 0.011)。虽然经验超过3年的住院医师、每个机构更多的住院医师以及自主权与工作满意度的提高相关,但这些关联在统计学上并不显著。此外,夜班工作、工作类型或工作时长与工作满意度之间没有关联。

结论

尽管韩国住院医师主要专注于临床实践,但我们的研究强调了研究导师的指导对工作满意度的积极影响,这得到了全面的单变量和多变量分析的支持。这些发现表明韩国住院医师的角色正在逐步转变,因为他们在提供患者护理的同时越来越多地参与研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aac4/11803046/cdd699c60e55/11606_2024_8910_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aac4/11803046/cdd699c60e55/11606_2024_8910_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aac4/11803046/cdd699c60e55/11606_2024_8910_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Current Status of Hospitalist Practice and Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction in Korea.韩国住院医师执业现状及影响工作满意度的因素
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(2):302-308. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08910-8. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
2
Job characteristics, satisfaction, and burnout across hospitalist practice models.医院医生实践模式下的工作特征、满意度和倦怠情况。
J Hosp Med. 2012 May-Jun;7(5):402-10. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1907. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
3
Association between practice setting and pediatric hospitalist career satisfaction.执业环境与儿科住院医师职业满意度之间的关联。
Hosp Pediatr. 2013 Jul;3(3):285-91. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2012-0085.
4
Career satisfaction and the role of mentorship: a survey of pediatric hospitalists.职业满意度与导师指导的作用:一项针对儿科住院医师的调查
Hosp Pediatr. 2012 Jul;2(3):141-8. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2011-0022.
5
Effect of a hospitalist-care coordinator team on a nonteaching hospitalist service.住院医师护理协调团队对非教学医院住院医师服务的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2008 Mar;3(2):103-9. doi: 10.1002/jhm.280.
6
Prevalence, risk and protective factors of burnout among Korean hospitalists.韩国住院医师职业倦怠的患病率、风险因素及保护因素
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0320128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320128. eCollection 2025.
7
Nationwide survey of internal medicine hospitalists in Korea: motivation and sustainability of a hospitalist career.韩国内科医院医师的全国性调查:医院医师职业的动机和可持续性。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 May;38(3):434-443. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.284. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
8
Worklife and satisfaction of hospitalists: toward flourishing careers.医院医师的工作生活和满意度:追求蓬勃发展的职业生涯。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jan;27(1):28-36. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1780-z. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
9
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction in Inpatient Care Provided by Hospitalists and Nonhospitalists in South Korea.韩国的住院医生和非住院医生提供的住院护理的患者满意度比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158101.
10
Characteristics, satisfiers, development needs, and barriers to success for early-career academic hospitalists.初任学术型医院医师的特征、满足感、发展需求和成功障碍。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03356-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Nationwide survey of internal medicine hospitalists in Korea: motivation and sustainability of a hospitalist career.韩国内科医院医师的全国性调查:医院医师职业的动机和可持续性。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 May;38(3):434-443. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.284. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Professional Status of Infectious Disease Specialists in Korea: A Nationwide Survey.韩国传染病专家的专业地位:一项全国性调查。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Dec 5;37(47):e320. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e320.
3
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction in Inpatient Care Provided by Hospitalists and Nonhospitalists in South Korea.
韩国的住院医生和非住院医生提供的住院护理的患者满意度比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8101. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158101.
4
Improved Inpatient Care through Greater Patient-Doctor Contact under the Hospitalist Management Approach: A Real-Time Assessment.通过住院医师管理模式下增加医患接触改善住院患者护理:实时评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 26;18(11):5718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115718.
5
A surgical hospitalist system in Korea: a preliminary study of the effects on hospital costs and postoperative outcomes.韩国的外科住院医师制度:对医院成本和术后结果影响的初步研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 May;100(5):298-304. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.5.298. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
6
A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).基于共识的调查研究报告清单(CROSS)
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3179-3187. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
7
Comparisons of Clinical Outcomes between Weekday-Only and Full-Time, 24-Hour/7-Day Coverage Hospitalist Systems.仅工作日和全职、24 小时/7 天覆盖的医院医生系统的临床结果比较。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 May 11;35(18):e117. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e117.
8
Evaluating the Outcome of Multi-Morbid Patients Cared for by Hospitalists: a Report of Integrated Medical Model in Korea.评价医院医师照护的多病共存患者的结果:韩国综合医疗模式的报告。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Jul 1;34(25):e179. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e179.
9
Impact of hospitalists on the efficiency of inpatient care and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.住院医师对住院治疗效率和患者满意度的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2019 Apr 12;9(2):121-134. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2019.1591901. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Patient safety after implementation of a coproduced family centered communication programme: multicenter before and after intervention study.实施以家庭为中心的共同制定的沟通方案后患者的安全性:多中心干预前后研究。
BMJ. 2018 Dec 5;363:k4764. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4764.