Suppr超能文献

内镜减压与开放椎板切除术治疗胸椎黄韧带骨化症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of endoscopic decompression to open laminectomy in patients with thoracic ossified ligamentum flavum - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department Of Orthopaedics, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jul 22;47(1):345. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02591-x.

Abstract

In recent years, there has been growing interest in an alternative approach for treating TOLF, such as endoscopic decompression, which minimizes the disruption of surrounding tissues. It is important to understand the advantages, disadvantages, and potential differences in outcomes associated with each approach. This comparative study aims to evaluate and contrast the effectiveness, safety, and outcomes of these two surgical techniques, open laminectomy and endoscopic decompression, in the management of thoracic OLF. The literature review was conducted on Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases. After a thorough screening of all search results, 14 studies were shortlisted, from which data was extracted, and statistical analysis was done. Pooled analysis was done to ascertain the intra-operative and post-operative outcomes after surgery for TOLF. Overall, 351 patients were included in the study for evaluation. 174 patients were operated on by open laminectomy, and 177 patients were seen in the endoscopy group. Decreased operative time was seen in the endoscopic subgroup. The mean length of hospital stay of 6.6 days. Both groups showed improvement in mJOA and VAS score. The recovery rate for the reported study cohort was 66.8%, with the Endoscopic surgical approach showing a positive correlation with the mean recovery rate. The dural tear was the most common complication, with a rate of 6.6%. The mean estimated infection rate was 2.7% and postoperative CSF leak was 3.7%, with a trend of significantly higher rates in the open subgroup. Both of the groups showed improvement in functional scores, VAS scores, and cross-sectional area. However, the Endoscopic decompression group experienced reduced hospital stays, operating times, and intraoperative blood loss. The most frequent side effects were CSF leak and dural tear. A few cases showed revision and infection. None of the problems differed between the groups.

摘要

近年来,人们对治疗 TOLF 的替代方法越来越感兴趣,例如内镜减压,它最大限度地减少了周围组织的破坏。了解每种方法的优势、劣势和潜在结果差异非常重要。本研究旨在评估和比较开放椎板切除术和内镜减压两种手术技术在治疗 TOLF 中的有效性、安全性和结果。文献综述在 Embase、PubMed、Scopus 和 Google Scholar 数据库中进行。对所有搜索结果进行彻底筛选后,有 14 项研究被列入研究范围,从中提取数据并进行统计分析。进行汇总分析以确定 TOLF 手术后的术中及术后结果。总的来说,有 351 名患者被纳入研究进行评估。174 名患者接受开放椎板切除术,177 名患者在内镜组就诊。内镜组手术时间缩短。平均住院时间为 6.6 天。两组 mJOA 和 VAS 评分均有所改善。报告的研究队列的恢复率为 66.8%,内镜手术方法与平均恢复率呈正相关。最常见的并发症是硬脑膜撕裂,发生率为 6.6%。估计的平均感染率为 2.7%,术后 CSF 漏为 3.7%,开放组的发生率呈明显上升趋势。两组的功能评分、VAS 评分和横截面积均有所改善。然而,内镜减压组的住院时间、手术时间和术中出血量减少。最常见的副作用是 CSF 漏和硬脑膜撕裂。少数病例出现复发和感染。这些问题在两组之间没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验