Wahlquist Amy E, Mathis Stephanie M, Hunt Trull Laura, Toitole Kusse Koirita, Howard Andrew, Fletcher Ernest, Meit Michael
Center for Rural Health Research, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Fletcher Group, Inc., London, KY, USA.
Subst Use Addctn J. 2025 Apr;46(2):238-246. doi: 10.1177/29767342241262125. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
Communities with robust recovery ecosystems could reduce negative outcomes associated with substance use disorders (SUDs) and facilitate the recovery process. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between drug overdose mortality rates in the United States and the strength of county-level recovery ecosystems, as measured by the Recovery Ecosystem Index (REI).
The REI assesses the strength of county-level recovery ecosystems in the United States. Comprised of 14 indicators across 3 component classes, overall and component scores ranging from "one" (strongest) to "five" (weakest) were calculated for each county using standardized values of the indicators. County-level analyses included: (1) correlational analyses between drug overdose mortality rates (n = 2076) and REI scores (overall score and by component); and (2) quadrant analysis (n = 2076), dividing counties based on their drug overdose mortality rates and overall REI scores.
Drug overdose mortality rates were inversely related to REI overall, SUD treatment component, and continuum of SUD support component scores, indicating that lower (stronger) scores corresponded to higher rates. Conversely, REI infrastructure and social component scores were positively related to rates. Counties were relatively evenly distributed across quadrants, with 26% (n = 537) with a strong REI score and high overdose mortality rate, 24% (n = 489) with a strong REI score and low overdose mortality rate, 20% (n = 409) with a weak REI and high overdose mortality rate, and 31% (n = 641) with a weak REI and low overdose mortality rate.
REI scores were generally inversely associated with drug overdose mortality rates in US counties, suggesting that communities have stronger recovery systems and services as the burden of SUD increases. Given relative variation in the scale of drug overdose mortality and strength of recovery ecosystems among counties, results could guide the identification of communities where the need for expanded recovery systems and services may be particularly critical.
拥有强大康复生态系统的社区可以减少与物质使用障碍(SUDs)相关的负面后果,并促进康复进程。这项横断面研究考察了美国药物过量死亡率与县级康复生态系统强度之间的关系,该强度通过康复生态系统指数(REI)来衡量。
REI评估美国县级康复生态系统的强度。它由3个组成类别中的14个指标构成,利用指标的标准化值为每个县计算总体得分和各组成部分得分,范围从“一”(最强)到“五”(最弱)。县级分析包括:(1)药物过量死亡率(n = 2076)与REI得分(总体得分及各组成部分得分)之间的相关性分析;(2)象限分析(n = 2076),根据各县的药物过量死亡率和总体REI得分对其进行划分。
药物过量死亡率与REI总体得分、SUD治疗组成部分得分以及SUD支持连续统一体组成部分得分呈负相关,这表明得分越低(越强),死亡率越高。相反,REI基础设施和社会组成部分得分与死亡率呈正相关。各县在象限中的分布相对均匀,26%(n = 537)的县REI得分高且药物过量死亡率高,24%(n = 489)的县REI得分高且药物过量死亡率低,20%(n = 409)的县REI得分低且药物过量死亡率高,31%(n = 641)的县REI得分低且药物过量死亡率低。
REI得分通常与美国各县的药物过量死亡率呈负相关,这表明随着SUD负担的增加,社区拥有更强的康复系统和服务。鉴于各县药物过量死亡率规模和康复生态系统强度的相对差异,研究结果可为识别那些对扩大康复系统和服务需求可能尤为关键的社区提供指导。