School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Pineal Res. 2024 Mar;76(2):e12936. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12936.
Women typically sleep and wake earlier than men and have been shown to have earlier circadian timing relative to the light/dark cycle that synchronizes the clock. A potential mechanism for earlier timing in women is an altered response of the circadian system to evening light. We characterized individual-level dose-response curves for light-induced melatonin suppression using a within-subjects protocol. Fifty-six participants (29 women, 27 men; aged 18-30 years) were exposed to a range of light illuminances (10, 30, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 2000 lux) using melatonin suppression relative to a dim control (<1 lux) as a marker of light sensitivity. Women were free from hormonal contraception. To examine the potential influence of sex hormones, estradiol and progesterone was examined in women and testosterone was examined in a subset of men. Menstrual phase was monitored using self-reports and estradiol and progesterone levels. Women exhibited significantly greater melatonin suppression than men under the 400-lux and 2000-lux conditions, but not under lower light conditions (10-200 lux). Light sensitivity did not differ by menstrual phase, nor was it associated with levels of estradiol, progesterone, or testosterone, suggesting the sex differences in light sensitivity were not acutely driven by circulating levels of sex hormones. These results suggest that sex differences in circadian timing are not due to differences in the response to dim/moderate light exposures typically experienced in the evening. The finding of increased bright light sensitivity in women suggests that sex differences in circadian timing could plausibly instead be driven by a greater sensitivity to phase-advancing effects of bright morning light.
女性通常比男性早睡早起,并且其昼夜节律相对于同步时钟的明暗周期更早。女性提前的潜在机制是昼夜节律系统对傍晚光线的反应改变。我们使用个体水平的剂量反应曲线来描述使用受试者内方案的光诱导褪黑素抑制。56 名参与者(29 名女性,27 名男性;年龄 18-30 岁)使用褪黑素抑制相对于昏暗对照(<1 lux)作为光敏感度的标志物,暴露于一系列光照照度(10、30、50、100、200、400 和 2000 lux)下。女性没有使用激素避孕。为了检查性激素的潜在影响,在女性中检查了雌二醇和孕酮,在一部分男性中检查了睾酮。使用自我报告和雌二醇和孕酮水平监测月经周期。在 400 勒克斯和 2000 勒克斯条件下,女性的褪黑素抑制作用明显高于男性,但在较低的光照条件(10-200 勒克斯)下则不然。光敏感度不因月经周期而不同,也与雌二醇、孕酮或睾酮水平无关,这表明对光敏感度的性别差异不是由循环性激素水平的急性驱动所致。这些结果表明,昼夜节律时间的性别差异不是由于对傍晚通常经历的昏暗/适度光照的反应差异所致。女性对强光的敏感性增加表明,昼夜节律时间的性别差异可能更合理地由对明亮晨光的相移作用的敏感性增加所驱动。