Suppr超能文献

工作时间协会共识声明:轮班工作耐受性的个体差异以及对研究与实践的建议。

Working Time Society consensus statements: Individual differences in shift work tolerance and recommendations for research and practice.

作者信息

Ritonja Jennifer, Aronson Kristan J, Matthews Raymond W, Boivin Diane B, Kantermann Thomas

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, and Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Canada.

Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, CQUniversity, Australia.

出版信息

Ind Health. 2019 Apr 1;57(2):201-212. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.SW-5. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

Abstract

There is no standard definition of shift work universally, and no validated report of complete biological adjustment to shift work in workers. Similarly, the evidence for shift work tolerance is limited due to a small number of studies and a narrow range of outcome measures. This paper discusses evidence to date regarding individual differences in shift work tolerance and highlights areas for future research and recommendations for workplace practice. The few factors that are consistently associated with perceived or actual shift work tolerance are young age, low scores of morningness or being a late chronotype, low scores of languidity and neuroticism, high scores on extraversion, internal locus of control and flexibility and male sex. An important first step is to differentiate between factors that are potentially modifiable, such as those that are determined by lifestyle choices, and those factors specific to the working time arrangement. Identifying determinants of shift work tolerance and the ability to adjust to shift work, whether they are innate and/or acquired mechanisms, is important so workers who are less likely to tolerate shift work well can be self-identified and supported with appropriate harm/risk minimization strategies. This paper also identifies important areas for future research with the goal of increasing the evidence base on which we can develop evidence-based harm mitigation strategies for shift workers.

摘要

目前尚无普遍适用的轮班工作标准定义,也没有关于工人对轮班工作实现完全生物适应的有效报告。同样,由于研究数量较少且结果测量范围狭窄,关于轮班工作耐受性的证据也很有限。本文讨论了迄今为止有关轮班工作耐受性个体差异的证据,并强调了未来研究的领域以及对工作场所实践的建议。与感知到的或实际的轮班工作耐受性始终相关的少数因素包括年轻、晨型得分低或属于晚睡型、慵懒和神经质得分低、外向性、内控点和灵活性得分高以及男性。重要的第一步是区分那些可能可改变的因素,例如由生活方式选择决定的因素,以及那些特定于工作时间安排的因素。确定轮班工作耐受性的决定因素以及适应轮班工作的能力,无论它们是先天的和/或后天获得的机制,都很重要,这样那些不太可能很好耐受轮班工作的工人就可以自我识别,并通过适当的伤害/风险最小化策略得到支持。本文还确定了未来研究的重要领域,目标是增加证据基础,以便我们能够为轮班工人制定基于证据的伤害减轻策略。

相似文献

2
Individual differences in tolerance to shift work--a systematic review.个体对轮班工作的耐受性差异——系统综述。
Sleep Med Rev. 2011 Aug;15(4):221-35. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
6
Shift-specific associations between age, chronotype and sleep duration.与年龄、睡眠类型和睡眠时间相关的特定轮班。
Chronobiol Int. 2019 Jun;36(6):784-795. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1586719. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Alertness After Night Shifts Among Workers in the Aluminium Industry.铝行业工人夜班后的警觉性
J Occup Environ Med. 2025 Aug 1;67(8):e568-e575. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003412. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Circadian realignment and depressed mood: A systematic review.昼夜节律重新调整与情绪低落:一项系统综述。
Sleep Med Rev. 2025 Feb;79:102022. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.102022. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
7
Sleep Inertia and Its Associates in Shift and Non-Shift Workers.轮班和非轮班工作者的睡眠惯性及其相关因素。
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Aug;21(8):905-911. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0037. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
9

本文引用的文献

8
Sex and gender differences in mental disorders.精神障碍中的性别差异。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;4(1):8-9. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30348-0. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验