Suppr超能文献

葡萄膜黑色素瘤细胞系中的蛋白和 mRNA 表达与 GNA 和 BAP1 突变状态相关。

Protein and mRNA Expression in Uveal Melanoma Cell Lines Are Related to GNA and BAP1 Mutation Status.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Jul 1;65(8):37. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.8.37.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Cell lines are being used in preclinical uveal melanoma (UM) research. Because not all cell lines harbor typical GNAQ or GNA11 hotspot mutations, we aimed at better classifying them and determining whether we could find genetic causes to explain the protein and mRNA expression profiles of the cell lines.

METHODS

We studied protein and mRNA expression of 14 UM cell lines and determined the presence of single nucleotide variants and small insertions and deletions with next-generation sequencing and copy number alterations with a single nucleotide polymorphism array. The lists of differentially expressed proteins and genes were merged, and shared lists were created, keeping only terms with concordant mRNA and protein expression. Enrichment analyses were performed on the shared lists.

RESULTS

Cell lines Mel285 and Mel290 are separate from GNA-mutated cell lines and show downregulation of melanosome-related markers. Both lack typical UM mutations but each harbors four putatively deleterious variants in CTNNB1, PPP1R10, LIMCH1, and APC in Mel285 and ARID1A, PPP1R10, SPG11, and RNF43 in Mel290. The upregulated terms in Mel285 and Mel290 did not point to a convincing alternative origin. Mel285 shows loss of chromosomes 1p, 3p, partial 3q, 6, and partial 8p, whereas Mel290 shows loss of 1p and 6. Expression in the other 12 cell lines was related to BAP1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Mel285 and Mel290 have copy number alterations that fit UM, multi-omics analyses show that they belong to a separate group compared to the other analyzed UM cell lines. Therefore, they may not be representative models to test potential therapeutic targets for UM.

摘要

目的

细胞系正被用于葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)的临床前研究。由于并非所有细胞系都存在典型的 GNAQ 或 GNA11 热点突变,我们旨在对其进行更好的分类,并确定是否可以找到遗传原因来解释细胞系的蛋白质和 mRNA 表达谱。

方法

我们研究了 14 种 UM 细胞系的蛋白质和 mRNA 表达,并通过下一代测序确定了单核苷酸变异和小插入缺失的存在,以及通过单核苷酸多态性阵列确定了拷贝数改变。合并差异表达蛋白和基因列表,并创建共享列表,仅保留与 mRNA 和蛋白表达一致的术语。对共享列表进行富集分析。

结果

细胞系 Mel285 和 Mel290 与 GNA 突变细胞系不同,表现为黑色素体相关标记物下调。两者均缺乏典型的 UM 突变,但 Mel285 中分别在 CTNNB1、PPP1R10、LIMCH1 和 APC 中存在四个假定的有害变异,在 Mel290 中存在 ARID1A、PPP1R10、SPG11 和 RNF43。Mel285 和 Mel290 中上调的术语并没有指向一个令人信服的替代起源。Mel285 显示 1p、3p、3q 部分、6 和 8p 部分缺失,而 Mel290 显示 1p 和 6 缺失。其他 12 种细胞系的表达与 BAP1 表达相关。

结论

尽管 Mel285 和 Mel290 具有符合 UM 的拷贝数改变,但多组学分析表明,与其他分析的 UM 细胞系相比,它们属于一个单独的群体。因此,它们可能不是用于测试 UM 潜在治疗靶点的代表性模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/119e/11268447/e43b2cc1fb23/iovs-65-8-37-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验