• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习实施基于指南的决策支持系统以改善中国基层医疗中的高血压治疗:实用集群随机对照试验。

Learning implementation of a guideline based decision support system to improve hypertension treatment in primary care in China: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

National Clinical Research Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Fuwai Hospital, National Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China.

National Clinical Research Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Shenzhen, Fuwai Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

BMJ. 2024 Jul 23;386:e079143. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-079143.

DOI:10.1136/bmj-2023-079143
PMID:39043397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11265211/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) in improving the use of guideline accordant antihypertensive treatment in primary care settings in China.

DESIGN

Pragmatic, open label, cluster randomised trial.

SETTING

94 primary care practices in four urban regions of China between August 2019 and July 2022: Luoyang (central China), Jining (east China), and Shenzhen (south China, including two regions).

PARTICIPANTS

94 practices were randomised (46 to CDSS, 48 to usual care). 12 137 participants with hypertension who used up to two classes of antihypertensives and had a systolic blood pressure <180 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <110 mm Hg were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Primary care practices were randomised to use an electronic health record based CDSS, which recommended a specific guideline accordant regimen for initiation, titration, or switching of antihypertensive (the intervention), or to use the same electronic health record without CDSS and provide treatment as usual (control).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of hypertension related visits during which an appropriate (guideline accordant) treatment was provided. Secondary outcomes were the average reduction in systolic blood pressure and proportion of participants with controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) at the last scheduled follow-up. Safety outcomes were patient reported antihypertensive treatment related events, including syncope, injurious fall, symptomatic hypotension or systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, and bradycardia.

RESULTS

5755 participants with 23 113 visits in the intervention group and 6382 participants with 27 868 visits in the control group were included. Mean age was 61 (standard deviation 13) years and 42.5% were women. During a median 11.6 months of follow-up, the proportion of visits at which appropriate treatment was given was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (77.8% (17 975/23 113) 62.2% (17 328/27 868); absolute difference 15.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI) 10.7 to 19.8); P<0.001; odds ratio 2.17 (95% CI 1.75 to 2.69); P<0.001). Compared with participants in the control group, those in the intervention group had a 1.6 mm Hg (95% CI -2.7 to -0.5) greater reduction in systolic blood pressure (-1.5 mm Hg 0.3 mm Hg; P=0.006) and a 4.4 percentage point (95% CI -0.7 to 9.5) improvement in blood pressure control rate (69.0% (3415/4952) 64.6% (3778/5845); P=0.07). Patient reported antihypertensive treatment related adverse effects were rare in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a CDSS in primary care in China improved the provision of guideline accordant antihypertensive treatment and led to a modest reduction in blood pressure. The CDSS offers a promising approach to delivering better care for hypertension, both safely and efficiently.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03636334.

摘要

目的

评估临床决策支持系统(CDSS)在改善中国基层医疗环境中遵循指南的降压治疗效果。

设计

实用、开放标签、整群随机试验。

地点

2019 年 8 月至 2022 年 7 月期间中国四个城市地区(中国中部的洛阳、中国东部的济宁和中国南部的深圳,包括两个地区)的 94 个基层医疗诊所。

参与者

94 个诊所被随机分配(46 个使用 CDSS,48 个使用常规护理)。纳入了 12137 名使用了最多两种降压药物且收缩压<180mmHg 且舒张压<110mmHg 的高血压患者。

干预措施

基层医疗诊所被随机分配使用基于电子病历的 CDSS,该系统推荐特定的符合指南的方案来启动、滴定或转换降压药物(干预),或使用相同的电子病历而不使用 CDSS 并提供常规治疗(对照组)。

主要结局测量

主要结局是在适当(符合指南)的治疗中提供的高血压相关就诊比例。次要结局是收缩压的平均降低和最后预约随访时血压控制良好(<140/90mmHg)的参与者比例。安全结局是患者报告的降压治疗相关不良事件,包括晕厥、伤害性跌倒、症状性低血压或收缩压<90mmHg 以及心动过缓。

结果

干预组有 5755 名参与者和 23113 次就诊,对照组有 6382 名参与者和 27868 次就诊。平均年龄为 61(标准差 13)岁,42.5%为女性。在中位 11.6 个月的随访期间,干预组的就诊中给予适当治疗的比例高于对照组(77.8%(17975/23113)比 62.2%(17328/27868);绝对差异 15.2 个百分点(95%置信区间(CI)为 10.7 至 19.8);P<0.001;比值比(OR)2.17(95%CI 1.75 至 2.69);P<0.001)。与对照组参与者相比,干预组参与者的收缩压降低了 1.6mmHg(95%CI-2.7 至-0.5)(-1.5mmHg 至 0.3mmHg;P=0.006),血压控制率提高了 4.4 个百分点(95%CI-0.7 至 9.5)(69.0%(3415/4952)比 64.6%(3778/5845);P=0.07)。两组患者报告的降压治疗相关不良事件均很少见。

结论

在中国基层医疗中使用 CDSS 提高了遵循指南的降压治疗效果,并导致血压适度降低。CDSS 提供了一种有前途的方法,可以安全有效地为高血压患者提供更好的护理。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03636334。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/301b/11265211/91546d0dc72a/sonj079143.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/301b/11265211/36acea63ee45/sonj079143.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/301b/11265211/6a635cfe209a/sonj079143.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/301b/11265211/91546d0dc72a/sonj079143.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/301b/11265211/36acea63ee45/sonj079143.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/301b/11265211/6a635cfe209a/sonj079143.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/301b/11265211/91546d0dc72a/sonj079143.f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning implementation of a guideline based decision support system to improve hypertension treatment in primary care in China: pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.学习实施基于指南的决策支持系统以改善中国基层医疗中的高血压治疗:实用集群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2024 Jul 23;386:e079143. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-079143.
2
Effectiveness of a clinical decision support system for hypertension management in primary care: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.临床决策支持系统在基层医疗高血压管理中的效果评价:一项实用型群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 May 16;23(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06374-x.
3
Effect of fixed dose combination treatment on adherence and risk factor control among patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: randomised controlled trial in primary care.固定剂量联合治疗对心血管疾病高危患者依从性和危险因素控制的影响:初级保健中的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3318. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3318.
4
Effect of Electronic Health Record-Based Medication Support and Nurse-Led Medication Therapy Management on Hypertension and Medication Self-management: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于电子健康记录的药物支持和护士主导的药物治疗管理对高血压和药物自我管理的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Aug 1;178(8):1069-1077. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2372.
5
Fixed Low-Dose Triple Combination Antihypertensive Medication vs Usual Care for Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension in Sri Lanka: A Randomized Clinical Trial.固定低剂量三联抗高血压药物与常规护理治疗斯里兰卡轻中度高血压患者的血压控制:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 14;320(6):566-579. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10359.
6
Long-Term Effect of Home Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring Plus Medication Self-Titration for Patients With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the ADAMPA Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭血压自我监测加药物自我滴定对高血压患者的长期影响:ADAMPA 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2410063. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10063.
7
Effect of intensive structured care on individual blood pressure targets in primary care: multicentre randomised controlled trial.强化结构化护理对初级保健中个体血压目标的影响:多中心随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2012 Nov 20;345:e7156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7156.
8
Effectiveness of a non-physician community health-care provider-led intensive blood pressure intervention versus usual care on cardiovascular disease (CRHCP): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, cluster-randomised trial.非医师社区卫生保健提供者主导的强化血压干预与常规护理对心血管疾病的效果(CRHCP):一项开放标签、盲终点、群组随机试验。
Lancet. 2023 Mar 18;401(10380):928-938. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02603-4. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Effect of Antihypertensive Medication Reduction vs Usual Care on Short-term Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Hypertension Aged 80 Years and Older: The OPTIMISE Randomized Clinical Trial.降压药物减少与常规护理对 80 岁及以上高血压患者短期血压控制的影响:OPTIMISE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2039-2051. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4871.

引用本文的文献

1
The Lancet Commission on rethinking coronary artery disease: moving from ischaemia to atheroma.《柳叶刀》冠心病重新思考委员会:从缺血到动脉粥样硬化的转变
Lancet. 2025 Apr 12;405(10486):1264-1312. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00055-8. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Global trends in the burden of ischemic heart disease based on the global burden of disease study 2021: the role of metabolic risk factors.基于《2021年全球疾病负担研究》的缺血性心脏病负担全球趋势:代谢危险因素的作用
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21588-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities.利用临床决策支持系统的力量:挑战与机遇。
Open Heart. 2023 Nov 28;10(2):e002432. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432.
2
Hypertension treatment capacity in India by increased workforce, greater task-sharing, and extended prescription period: a modelling study.通过增加劳动力、扩大任务分担和延长处方期限来提高印度高血压治疗能力:一项建模研究
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2022 Dec 14;10:100124. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100124. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Primary care institutional characteristics associated with hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in the China PEACE-Million Persons Project and primary health-care survey: a cross-sectional study.
在中国高血压调查和基层医疗服务调查(China PEACE-Million Persons Project and primary health-care survey)中,与高血压知晓率、治疗率和控制率相关的基层医疗服务机构特征:一项横断面研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jan;11(1):e83-e94. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00428-4.
4
The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk: A Compass for Future Health.心血管疾病及其风险的全球负担:未来健康指南。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Dec 20;80(25):2361-2371. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.005. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
Clinical decision support in cardiovascular medicine.心血管医学中的临床决策支持
BMJ. 2022 May 25;377:e059818. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2020-059818.
6
Effectiveness of a clinical decision support system for hypertension management in primary care: study protocol for a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.临床决策支持系统在基层医疗高血压管理中的效果评价:一项实用型群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 May 16;23(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06374-x.
7
A village doctor-led multifaceted intervention for blood pressure control in rural China: an open, cluster randomised trial.农村中国以乡村医生为基础的多方面血压控制干预措施:一项开放、整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2022 May 21;399(10339):1964-1975. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00325-7. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
8
Association of Differences in Treatment Intensification, Missed Visits, and Scheduled Follow-up Interval With Racial or Ethnic Disparities in Blood Pressure Control.治疗强化程度、就诊失约和规定随访间隔方面的差异与血压控制方面的种族或民族差异之间的关联。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Feb 1;7(2):204-212. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4996.
9
Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants.全球高血压患病率趋势及 1990 至 2019 年治疗和控制进展情况:1040 万参与者、1201 项人群代表性研究的汇总分析
Lancet. 2021 Sep 11;398(10304):957-980. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01330-1. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
10
Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension.全球高血压流行病学、健康负担及有效干预措施
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Nov;18(11):785-802. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00559-8. Epub 2021 May 28.