Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2024 Sep-Oct;51(5):475-481. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.06.011. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
To compare the effects of intranasal (IN) and intramuscular (IM) midazolam-butorphanol-ketamine on intraocular pressure (IOP), tear production (TP) and sedation in rabbits.
Prospective, randomized, crossover experimental study.
Fourteen male New Zealand White rabbits, aged 1-2 years, body mass 3.1 ± 0.8 kg (mean ± standard deviation).
Rabbits were administered midazolam (1 mg kg), butorphanol (1.5 mg kg) and ketamine (5 mg kg) via IN and IM routes. IOP, TP and sedation scores were assessed at 0 (before drug administration), 5, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after drug administration. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (f), rectal temperature (RT), noninvasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and peripheral hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SpO) were simultaneously recorded until 45 minutes after drug administration. The onset and duration of sedation and sedation scores were recorded.
Drug delivery route had no significant impact on mean IOP (p = 0.271) or TP (p = 0.062), and there were no significant changes over time for IOP (p = 0.711) or TP (p = 0.372). Similarly, delivery route had no significant impact on HR (p = 0.747), f (p = 0.872), RT (p = 0.379), MAP (p = 0.217) and SpO (p = 0.254). Sedation onset was faster with IN (3.0 ± 1.0 minutes) than with IM administration (4.9 ± 0.7 minutes) (p = 0.011), but sedation duration was significantly longer with IM (52.6 ± 7.2 minutes) than with IN delivery (30.7 ± 6.8 minutes) (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in sedation scores between the two delivery routes at any of the recorded time points.
The combination of midazolam-butorphanol-ketamine had minimal impact on physiological and ocular variables regardless of the route of administration, whereas IN drug administration led to a shorter onset and duration of action than IM administration.
比较鼻腔内(IN)和肌肉内(IM)给予咪达唑仑-布托啡诺-氯胺酮对兔眼内压(IOP)、泪液产生(TP)和镇静的影响。
前瞻性、随机、交叉实验研究。
14 只雄性新西兰白兔,1-2 岁,体重 3.1±0.8kg(均值±标准差)。
兔给予咪达唑仑(1mg/kg)、布托啡诺(1.5mg/kg)和氯胺酮(5mg/kg),通过 IN 和 IM 途径给药。在给药前(0 分钟)、给药后 5、15、30、45 和 60 分钟评估 IOP、TP 和镇静评分。同时记录心率(HR)、呼吸频率(f)、直肠温度(RT)、无创平均动脉血压(MAP)和外周血红蛋白氧饱和度(SpO2),直至给药后 45 分钟。记录镇静的起效时间和持续时间以及镇静评分。
药物给药途径对平均 IOP(p=0.271)或 TP(p=0.062)均无显著影响,IOP(p=0.711)或 TP(p=0.372)随时间无显著变化。同样,给药途径对 HR(p=0.747)、f(p=0.872)、RT(p=0.379)、MAP(p=0.217)和 SpO2(p=0.254)均无显著影响。IN 给药的镇静起效时间更快(3.0±1.0 分钟),而 IM 给药的镇静起效时间更长(4.9±0.7 分钟)(p=0.011),但 IM 给药的镇静持续时间明显更长(52.6±7.2 分钟),而 IN 给药的镇静持续时间更短(30.7±6.8 分钟)(p=0.004)。在记录的任何时间点,两种给药途径的镇静评分均无显著差异。
无论给药途径如何,咪达唑仑-布托啡诺-氯胺酮的联合应用对生理和眼部变量的影响都很小,而 IN 给药比 IM 给药的起效时间更短,作用持续时间更短。