Suppr超能文献

肌肉内给予 Alfaxalone-Butorphanol-Midazolam 与给予氯胺酮-Butorphanol-Midazolam 在新西兰白兔中的比较。

Intramuscular Alfaxalone-Butorphanol-Midazolam Compared with Ketamine-Butorphanol- Midazolam in New Zealand White Rabbits.

机构信息

Departments of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Departments of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina;, Email:

出版信息

J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 Sep 1;61(5):475-481. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000038. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

Abstract

Rabbits are a common companion animal and research subject and frequently require sedation to facilitate procedures. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of intramuscular butorphanol and midazolam combined with either alfaxalone or ketamine in rabbits. In a complete crossover study, healthy New Zealand white rabbits ( = 9; age, 6 mo) randomly received midazolam (1 mg/kg IM) and butorphanol (1 mg/kg IM) combined with either alfaxalone (2 mg/kg IM; ABM) or ketamine (5 mg/kg IM; KBM). Time to first effects, recumbency, and standing (recovery) were recorded. Every 5 min during recumbency, an investigator who was blind to treatment group collected serial physiologic parameters and sedation scores. At 5 min after rabbits became recumbent, manipulations were performed to mimic 2-view radiography and a cephalic intravenous catheter was placed. At 30 min after drug injection, flumazenil (0.05 mg/kg IM) was administered for reversal. Food consumption and fecal output were measured for 3 d after each study day. Time to standing and duration of recumbency differed significantly between groups. The median (range) of the total sedation score for ABM was 10 (8 to 10) and for KBM was 10 (6 to 10). Sham radiographs were successful in all rabbits in both groups. Physiologic parameters were not significantly different between groups over time. At 24 h after drug treatment, KBM-treated rabbits showed reduced food intake and both groups showed reduced fecal output. Total sedation scores decreased significantly over time in KBM rabbits ( < 0.001) but not in ABM rabbits ( = 1). The duration of recumbency was significantly longer in ABM rabbits than in KBM rabbits. Both protocols produced sufficient sedation for radiograph acquisition without clinically significant adverse effects.

摘要

兔子是常见的伴侣动物和研究对象,经常需要镇静以方便操作。本研究的目的是比较肌肉注射丁丙诺啡和咪达唑仑联合使用氟烷或氯胺酮对兔子的影响。在完全交叉研究中,健康的新西兰白兔(n = 9;年龄,6 月龄)随机接受咪达唑仑(1 mg/kg,肌内注射)和丁丙诺啡(1 mg/kg,肌内注射),联合氟烷(2 mg/kg,肌内注射;ABM)或氯胺酮(5 mg/kg,肌内注射;KBM)。记录首次起效时间、卧倒时间和站立(恢复)时间。卧倒后每 5 分钟,一位对治疗组不知情的研究者收集连续的生理参数和镇静评分。兔子卧倒后 5 分钟,进行模拟 2 视图放射摄影的操作,并放置头静脉导管。药物注射后 30 分钟,给予氟马西尼(0.05 mg/kg,肌内注射)逆转。在每个研究日后的 3 天内,测量食物消耗和粪便排出量。站立时间和卧倒时间在各组之间有显著差异。ABM 的总镇静评分中位数(范围)为 10(8 至 10),KBM 为 10(6 至 10)。两组的假放射照片均在所有兔子中成功。随着时间的推移,各组的生理参数无显著差异。药物治疗后 24 小时,KBM 组兔子的食物摄入量减少,两组的粪便排出量均减少。KBM 组兔子的总镇静评分随时间显著降低( <0.001),但 ABM 组无显著变化( = 1)。ABM 组兔子的卧倒时间明显长于 KBM 组。两种方案均能产生足够的镇静作用以获取放射照片,且无明显的不良反应。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Testing of a Sedation Scale for Use in Rabbits ().用于兔镇静评估的镇静量表的制订与测试。()
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2021 Sep 1;60(5):549-555. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000002. Epub 2021 Aug 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验