J. Scott Roberts, University of Michigan School of Public Health, USA,
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(4):1079-1086. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.69.
The increasing availability of genetic testing for late-onset diseases such as Alzheimer's disease necessitates understanding public perceptions and experiences of such testing among at-risk populations.
To assess (a) prior uptake of genetic testing (both in medical and direct-to-consumer settings), (b) future interest in genetic testing for late-onset conditions (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease), and (c) perceptions of testing pros and cons among middle-to-older aged adults.
Online, cross-sectional survey study.
The National Poll on Healthy Aging at the University of Michigan is a recurring biannual survey of a nationally representative sample of adults aged 50-80. This study reports on a March 2018 fielding of the survey that included a genetic testing module administered to adults aged 50-64.
Study participants were 991 community-dwelling adults aged 50-64.
Survey measures assessed (a) prior use of genetic testing, (b) reasons for engaging in genetic testing, (c) interest in different types of genetic testing, including for Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and macular degeneration, and (d) perceived benefits, risks, and limitations of testing.
Previous uptake of genetic testing was limited (medical use: 5.1%; direct-to-consumer: 10.8%), with direct-to-consumer test uptake higher among respondents with household incomes of $100,000 or more. Over half of adults endorsed interest in genetic testing for estimation of disease risk (58.9%), ancestry knowledge (58%), and informing medical care (53.8%). Interest in genetic testing for specific late-onset conditions was even higher, including Alzheimer's disease (70%), Parkinson's disease (65.3%), and macular degeneration (64.3%). Multivariable logistic regression models showed that older adults more likely to be interested in genetic testing for medical or disease risk purposes were those with higher levels of education (college degree or higher) and who endorsed the benefits of genetic testing, whereas respondents who endorsed testing risks and limitations were less likely to express interest.
While prior use of genetic testing among the middle-to-older age population was low, interest in testing for Alzheimer's disease and other late-onset conditions was high. This high interest may translate into increased uptake given expanded access to testing and recent treatment advances for Alzheimer's disease.
随着针对阿尔茨海默病等迟发性疾病的基因检测日益普及,有必要了解高危人群对这种检测的看法和体验。
评估(a)以前在医疗和直接面向消费者的环境中进行的基因检测(b)对迟发性疾病(例如阿尔茨海默病、帕金森病)的基因检测的未来兴趣,以及(c)中年以上成年人对检测优缺点的看法。
在线,横断面调查研究。
密歇根大学国家健康老龄化民意调查是一项对 50-80 岁成年人进行的全国代表性样本的定期半年一次的调查。本研究报告了 2018 年 3 月进行的一项民意调查,该调查包括对 50-64 岁成年人进行的基因检测模块。
研究参与者为 991 名居住在社区的 50-64 岁成年人。
调查措施评估了(a)以前使用基因检测的情况,(b)参与基因检测的原因,(c)对不同类型的基因检测的兴趣,包括对阿尔茨海默病、帕金森病和黄斑变性的检测,以及(d)检测的益处、风险和局限性的看法。
以前接受基因检测的人数有限(医疗用途:5.1%;直接面向消费者:10.8%),家庭收入在 10 万美元或以上的受访者中直接面向消费者的检测率较高。超过一半的成年人表示有兴趣进行基因检测以估计疾病风险(58.9%)、了解祖先知识(58%)和为医疗服务提供信息(53.8%)。对特定迟发性疾病(包括阿尔茨海默病、帕金森病和黄斑变性)的基因检测兴趣甚至更高,分别为 70%、65.3%和 64.3%。多变量逻辑回归模型显示,对出于医疗或疾病风险目的进行基因检测更感兴趣的老年成年人是那些具有较高教育水平(大学学历或以上)并认可基因检测益处的成年人,而那些认可检测风险和局限性的成年人则不太可能表示有兴趣。
虽然中老年人群中以前使用基因检测的人数较少,但对阿尔茨海默病和其他迟发性疾病的检测兴趣很高。鉴于对检测的获取增加和最近针对阿尔茨海默病的治疗进展,这种高兴趣可能会转化为更高的检测使用率。