Suppr超能文献

老年转移性食管癌和胃癌患者姑息化疗的结果。

Outcomes in older adults with metastatic esophageal and gastric carcinoma treated with palliative chemotherapy.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto ON, Canada.

Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2024 Nov 4;29(11):e1501-e1510. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae190.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma (GEC) in elderly patients is increasing, yet patients ≥75 years have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. We sought to investigate palliative chemotherapy administration patterns and survival outcomes in older adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis identified patients aged 65-74 (young-old) and ≥75 years (older-old) diagnosed with advanced GEC. Patient and tumor characteristics were recorded, with descriptive analysis, time-to-event data analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-eight "young-old" and 109 'older-old' patients were identified. Patient characteristics were similar between groups except for Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI), with lower co-morbidities in the "young-old" compared to "older-old" cohort (P < .001; CCI = 0 in 103 (52%) "young-old" vs 31 (28%) "older-old"). The primary diagnosis in both groups was adenocarcinoma. 119 (60%) "young-old" and 25 (23%) "older-old" patients received chemotherapy (P < .001). Performance status was the primary explanation for chemotherapy non-receipt in both cohorts; age was the explanation in 21 (25%) "older-old" patients and none in the "young-old" patients. PFS for first-line systemic therapy in "young-old" patients was 6.4 (95% CI 5.9-7.6) versus 7.5 months (95% CI 5.1-11.3) in "older-old" patients (P = .69) whilst respective OS was 12.3 (95% CI 10.1-15.5) and 10.4 months (95% CI 9.0-14.6) (P = .0816). Toxicity prompted chemotherapy cessation in 17 (15%) "young-old" and 3 (13%) "older-old" patients (P = .97). Multivariate analysis identified CCI and ECOG performance status as predictive for PFS and OS, respectively. No causative relationship was identified with other variables.

CONCLUSION

Our study of real-world older-adults show that significant number of "older-old" patients with GEC do not receive chemotherapy. Among "older-old" adults who do receive systemic therapy, outcomes are comparable; this underscores the importance of geriatric assessment-guided care and suggests that age alone should not be a barrier to receipt of chemotherapy in patients with advanced GEC.

摘要

背景

老年患者食管癌和胃癌(GEC)的发病率正在上升,但历史上 75 岁以上的患者在临床试验中代表性不足。我们旨在研究老年患者姑息性化疗的管理模式和生存结局。

材料与方法

回顾性分析确定了年龄在 65-74 岁(年轻老年)和≥75 岁(老年老年)的晚期 GEC 患者。记录患者和肿瘤特征,使用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线进行描述性分析、生存时间数据分析和多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析。

结果

确定了 198 名“年轻老年”和 109 名“老年老年”患者。两组患者的特征除 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)外相似,年轻老年组的合并症较少(P<0.001;CCI=0 的患者分别为 103 例(52%)“年轻老年”和 31 例(28%)“老年老年”)。两组的主要诊断均为腺癌。119 名(60%)“年轻老年”和 25 名(23%)“老年老年”患者接受了化疗(P<0.001)。在两个队列中,体能状态都是未接受化疗的主要原因;在 21 名(25%)“老年老年”患者中,年龄是原因,而在“年轻老年”患者中没有。“年轻老年”患者一线系统治疗的 PFS 为 6.4 个月(95%CI 5.9-7.6),而“老年老年”患者为 7.5 个月(95%CI 5.1-11.3)(P=0.69),相应的 OS 分别为 12.3 个月(95%CI 10.1-15.5)和 10.4 个月(95%CI 9.0-14.6)(P=0.0816)。毒性导致 17 名(15%)“年轻老年”和 3 名(13%)“老年老年”患者停止化疗(P=0.97)。多变量分析确定 CCI 和 ECOG 体能状态分别为 PFS 和 OS 的预测因素。其他变量与两者之间没有因果关系。

结论

我们对真实世界老年患者的研究表明,大量 GEC“老年老年”患者未接受化疗。在接受系统治疗的“老年老年”成人中,结果相当;这强调了老年评估指导护理的重要性,并表明年龄本身不应成为晚期 GEC 患者接受化疗的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cdb7/11546644/6590c1951eb3/oyae190_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验