Konopka Magdalena Johanna, Keizer Hans, Rietjens Gerard, Zeegers Maurice Petrus, Sperlich Billy
Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Institute for Healthcare Management and Health Sciences, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Front Physiol. 2024 Jul 10;15:1389844. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1389844. eCollection 2024.
Exercise scientists (especially in the field of biomolecular research) frequently classify athletic cohorts into categories such as , , or , and create a practical framework for studying diverse athletic populations between seemingly similar groups. It is crucial to recognize the limitations and complexities of these classifications, as they may oversimplify the multidimensional characteristics of each sport. If so, the validity of studies dealing with such approaches may become compromised and the comparability across different studies challenging or impossible. This perspective critically examines and highlights the issues associated with current sports typologies, critiques existing sports classification systems, and emphasizes the imperative for a universally accepted classification model to enhance the quality of biomolecular research of sports in the future.
运动科学家(尤其是在生物分子研究领域)经常将运动员群体分为耐力型、力量型或速度型等类别,并为研究看似相似群体之间的不同运动员群体创建一个实用框架。认识到这些分类的局限性和复杂性至关重要,因为它们可能会过度简化每项运动的多维度特征。如果是这样,采用此类方法的研究的有效性可能会受到影响,不同研究之间的可比性也会具有挑战性或变得不可能。本文批判性地审视并突出了与当前运动类型学相关的问题,对现有的运动分类系统提出了批评,并强调了建立一个普遍接受的分类模型对于提高未来运动生物分子研究质量的必要性。