Karagül Sevil, Kibar Sibel, Ay Saime, Evcik Deniz, Ergin Süreyya
Istanbul Kent University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ufuk University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Turkey.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2024 May 26;15:e13. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2024.13. eCollection 2024.
This study was carried out to assess and compare the efficacies of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) applied to sciatic Valleix points to reduce sciatica in patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy. The study population consisted of 164 patients with chronic radicular pain caused by LDH. The remaining 75 patients were studied in three groups. TENS and hotpack were applied to the lower back region of all patients. In addition, group 1 (n=24), group 2 (n=25), and group 3 (n=26) received LLLT (4 J/cm for each point), TENS, and sham LLLT, respectively, on sciatic Valleix points five days a week, for three weeks (15 sessions). Outcomes were assessed at the beginning of the treatment, after completion of 3 weeks of treatment, and after three months (follow-up). Post-treatment assessments indicated that all parameters investigated within the scope of the study improved in all three groups, except for the VAS leg pain (VASLP) score in group 3. Post-treatment VASLP and DN4 scores of group 1 were significantly superior to those of group 2 (˂0.001). Follow-up assessments revealed an improvement only in the VASLP score and in group 1. The VASLP, DN-4, and ODI scores of groups 1 and 2 were significantly superior to those of group 3. There was no significant difference between the groups in the PSQI score and lumbar ROM value. Both LLLT and TENS were found to be effective in treating the sciatic nerve associated with lumbar disk herniation with radiculopathy. LLLT was found to be more effective than TENS in reducing leg and neuropathic pains. Follow-up assessments revealed that the only lasting effect of the treatments, which continued into the third month, was the improvement in leg pain.
本研究旨在评估和比较经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)和低强度激光疗法(LLLT)应用于坐骨神经压痛点对减轻慢性腰椎神经根病患者坐骨神经痛的疗效。研究对象为164例因腰椎间盘突出症导致慢性神经根性疼痛的患者。其余75例患者分为三组进行研究。所有患者的下背部均接受TENS和热敷治疗。此外,第1组(n = 24)、第2组(n = 25)和第3组(n = 26)分别在坐骨神经压痛点接受LLLT(每点4 J/cm²)、TENS和假LLLT治疗,每周5天,共3周(15次治疗)。在治疗开始时、治疗3周结束后以及3个月后(随访)评估结果。治疗后评估表明,除第3组的视觉模拟评分法腿痛(VASLP)评分外,研究范围内调查的所有参数在三组中均有所改善。第1组治疗后的VASLP和DN4评分显著优于第2组(˂0.001)。随访评估显示,仅第1组的VASLP评分有所改善。第1组和第2组的VASLP、DN - 4和ODI评分显著优于第3组。三组在匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分和腰椎活动度值方面无显著差异。发现LLLT和TENS在治疗与腰椎间盘突出症伴神经根病相关的坐骨神经方面均有效。发现LLLT在减轻腿部和神经性疼痛方面比TENS更有效。随访评估显示,持续到第三个月的治疗唯一持久效果是腿部疼痛有所改善。