• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对以工作为重点的医疗保健的需求:一项定性证据综合分析

Patients' Needs Regarding Work-Focused Healthcare: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.

作者信息

Hagendijk Marije E, Zipfel Nina, Melles Marijke, van der Wees Philip J, Hulshof Carel T J, Zwaan Elmi, van der Burg-Vermeulen Sylvia J, Hoving Jan L

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10225-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-024-10225-8
PMID:39052178
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify, appraise, and synthesize qualitative research evidence exploring patients' needs regarding work-focused healthcare.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement guidelines to identify studies reporting patients' needs regarding work-focused healthcare. Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo and Web of Science) were systematically searched from January 2000 until May 2023 and screened in duplicate by pairs of two reviewers. Inclusion criteria were qualitative data collection method, and patients' perspectives regarding healthcare focusing on work when experiencing work-related problems due to chronic medical conditions. Data extraction and synthesis was executed by means of an inductive thematic analysis approach. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the CASP Qualitative Study checklist. Confidence in the review findings was assessed through the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) approach.

RESULTS

Out of 23,677 records, 97 qualitative studies were included. Needs regarding four main themes were identified: (1) Substantive guidance, which comprises the specific content of work-focused healthcare; (2) Clear and continuous process, which comprises clarification and optimization of the work-focused healthcare process; (3) Supportive attitude and behavior, which comprises a positive and supportive attitude and behavior from professionals towards the patients; and (4) Tailored approach, which comprises the delivery of tailored care to the individuals' needs. 17 subthemes were identified.

CONCLUSION

The broader insight in patients' needs in work-focused healthcare can help (occupational) healthcare professionals adopt a more patient-centred approach in practice.

摘要

目的

识别、评估和综合定性研究证据,以探索患者对以工作为重点的医疗保健的需求。

方法

按照PRISMA声明指南进行系统评价,以识别报告患者对以工作为重点的医疗保健需求的研究。从2000年1月至2023年5月对四个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、PsychInfo和Web of Science)进行系统检索,并由两名审稿人成对进行重复筛选。纳入标准为定性数据收集方法,以及患者在因慢性病而出现与工作相关问题时对以工作为重点的医疗保健的看法。通过归纳主题分析方法进行数据提取和综合。使用CASP定性研究清单评估纳入研究的质量。通过定性研究综述证据可信度(CERQual)方法评估对综述结果的信心。

结果

在23677条记录中,纳入了97项定性研究。确定了关于四个主要主题的需求:(1)实质性指导,包括以工作为重点的医疗保健的具体内容;(2)清晰且持续的流程,包括以工作为重点的医疗保健流程的澄清和优化;(3)支持性态度和行为,包括专业人员对患者的积极和支持性态度及行为;(4)个性化方法,包括根据个人需求提供个性化护理。确定了17个子主题。

结论

对患者在以工作为重点的医疗保健方面需求的更广泛了解有助于(职业)医疗保健专业人员在实践中采用更以患者为中心的方法。

相似文献

1
Patients' Needs Regarding Work-Focused Healthcare: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.患者对以工作为重点的医疗保健的需求:一项定性证据综合分析
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10225-8.
2
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
5
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
6
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
7
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
8
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
9
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
10
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between attitude, perceived norm, and perceived behavioral control with the provision of Clinical Work-Integrating Care: A reasoned action approach.态度、感知规范和感知行为控制与提供临床工作整合式照护之间的关联:一种理性行动方法。
PEC Innov. 2025 Jun 27;7:100416. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100416. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Bridging the Gap Between Rehabilitation and Return to Work: A Qualitative Evaluation of a Workplace Intervention for Low Back Pain.弥合康复与重返工作岗位之间的差距:一项针对腰痛的职场干预措施的定性评估
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10295-2.
3
Barriers and Facilitators for Interprofessional Education in Work-Focused Healthcare: An Integrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Returning to work: a qualitative study of the experiences of head and neck cancer survivors.重返工作岗位:头颈部癌症幸存者经历的定性研究。
J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Jun;137(6):691-696. doi: 10.1017/S0022215122002201. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
Patients' Experiences, Needs, and Expectations of Cooperation Between Medical Specialists and Occupational Health Physicians: A Qualitative Study.患者对医学专家与职业健康医生合作的体验、需求和期望:一项定性研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2023 Jun 1;65(6):e395-e401. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002833. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
3
Navigating between stakeholders in return-to-work processes: A qualitative study exploring experiences of workers on sick leave due to back pain.
以工作为重点的医疗保健中跨专业教育的障碍与促进因素:一项综合综述。
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Feb 23. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10278-3.
4
Effectiveness of clinical healthcare interventions for enhancing the work participation of patients with various health conditions: a synthesis of systematic reviews.临床医疗干预措施对提高各种健康状况患者工作参与度的有效性:系统评价的综合分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 20;15(2):e094201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094201.
5
Predictors of sickness absence among employees with common mental disorders in Sweden- a longitudinal study.瑞典常见精神障碍员工病假缺勤的预测因素——一项纵向研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21563-4.
在重返工作过程中协调各利益相关者:一项探索因背痛休病假工人的经验的定性研究。
Work. 2023;75(4):1277-1287. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220309.
4
Current practices, needs, and expectations of discussing work with a medical specialist from a patient's perspective: a qualitative study.从患者角度探讨与医学专家讨论工作的现状、需求和期望:一项定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jan;46(1):115-128. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2157500. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Recognition During the Return-to-Work Process in Workers with Common Mental Disorders.常见精神障碍患者重返工作过程中的识别。
J Occup Rehabil. 2023 Sep;33(3):486-505. doi: 10.1007/s10926-022-10087-y. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
6
Facilitators and barriers to return to work in patients after heart surgery.心脏手术后患者重返工作岗位的促进因素和障碍
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Sep 28;11:310. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_70_22. eCollection 2022.
7
Experiences and perspectives of patients with advanced cancer regarding work resumption and work retention: a qualitative interview study.晚期癌症患者关于恢复工作和保留工作的经验和观点:一项定性访谈研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec;30(12):9713-9721. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07436-1. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
8
Return to work among workers recovering from severe COVID-19 in Slovenia: a focus group study.斯洛文尼亚严重 COVID-19 康复工人重返工作岗位:一项焦点小组研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Nov;45(23):3883-3892. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2142680. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
9
Facilitators and Barriers to Sustainable Employment After Spinal Cord Injury or Acquired Brain Injury: The Person's Perspective.脊髓损伤或后天性脑损伤后可持续就业的促进因素和障碍:个人视角
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jul 8;3:872782. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.872782. eCollection 2022.
10
Rare cancer and return to work: experiences and needs of patients and (health care) professionals.罕见癌症与重返工作:患者和(医疗保健)专业人员的经历和需求。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Aug;45(16):2585-2596. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2099589. Epub 2022 Jul 18.