Perra Joris, Poulin-Charronnat Bénédicte, Baccino Thierry, Bard Patrick, Pfister Philippe, Lalitte Philippe, Zerbib Mélissa, Drai-Zerbib Véronique
Laboratoire d'Etude de l'Apprentissage et du Developpement (LEAD) CNRS-UMR5022, Universite de Bourgogne.
Institut de Recherche en Musicologie (IReMus) CNRS-UMR8223, Sorbonne Universite.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Mar;51(3):496-513. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001358. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
Classical music pianists of five different conservatory levels, from undergraduate to professional, were tested on a sight-reading task with eye-movement recording. They had to sight read both tonal classical scores that followed the rules specific to Western tonal music, and atonal contemporary scores, which do not follow these rules. This study aimed at determining the extent to which eye movements and musical performance metrics can account for the level of sight-reading expertise. First, the results indicated that with the acquisition of expertise, musicians process visual information more rapidly (increasing their played tempo while decreasing average fixation duration and their number of fixations), more structurally (tending to increase their eye-hand span), and more accurately (increasing their sight-reading accuracy). Second, when they sight read contemporary scores compared to classical scores, musicians decreased their played tempo, tended to be less accurate, increased their number of fixations, and tended to decrease their eye-hand span. Finally, expertise effects were moderated by the type of score. These results suggest (a) that visual perception is progressively shaped through music reading expertise and through domain-specific knowledge acquisition, (b) that tonal-specific cues play a significant role to use an efficient eye-movement behavior and (c) that the benefit conferred by expert prior music-specific knowledge seems to be even greater for sight-reading tonal rather than atonal scores. Our findings are discussed in the light of expert memory theories (long-term working memory theory; Ericsson & Kintsch, 1995; template theory, Gobet & Simon, 1996). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
对来自五所不同音乐学院、从本科到专业水平的古典音乐钢琴家进行了一项视奏任务测试,并记录了他们的眼动情况。他们必须视奏遵循西方调性音乐特定规则的调性古典乐谱,以及不遵循这些规则的无调性当代乐谱。本研究旨在确定眼动和音乐表现指标在多大程度上可以解释视奏专业水平。首先,结果表明,随着专业技能的获得,音乐家处理视觉信息的速度更快(提高演奏速度,同时减少平均注视持续时间和注视次数)、更具结构性(倾向于增加眼手跨度)且更准确(提高视奏准确性)。其次,与古典乐谱相比,当音乐家视奏当代乐谱时,他们会降低演奏速度,准确性往往降低,注视次数增加,眼手跨度往往减小。最后,专业技能的影响受乐谱类型的调节。这些结果表明:(a)视觉感知通过音乐阅读专业技能和特定领域知识的获取而逐渐形成;(b)特定调性线索在使用高效眼动行为方面发挥着重要作用;(c)专家先前的特定音乐知识所带来的益处对于视奏调性乐谱似乎比对无调性乐谱更大。我们根据专家记忆理论(长期工作记忆理论;埃里克森和金茨克,1995;模板理论,戈贝特和西蒙,1996)对我们的发现进行了讨论。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)