Department of Pulmonology, Allergy Unit, Hôpital La Cavale Blanche, University Hospital of Bretagne Occidentale, Brest.
Department of Immunology, 'Hypersensibilité et Auto-immunité' Unit, UMR 996 INSERM, Hôpital Bichat- Claude Bernard, University of Paris-Saclay, Paris.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Oct 1;24(5):330-340. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000001011. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
This review aims to identify phenotypes at-risk of Hymenoptera venom-induced anaphylaxis (HVA), focusing on different perspectives (epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic) in order to adapt future preventive strategies.
HVA remains one of the leading causes of anaphylaxis, with a broad pattern of symptoms. Although most cases occur outside healthcare settings, data indicate a high emergency admission rate due to insect stings. Mortality is often underestimated because of the lack of witnesses and difficulties in recognizing the signs and the culprit. Targeting risk factors could be a clue to improve these statistics and the prognosis of the disease.Potential risk factors for severe HVA in the European population are basal serum tryptase (BST) above 8 μg, mast cell disorders, the absence of skin symptoms, and cardiovascular conditions requiring the use of beta blockers and ACE inhibitors. Identifying these criteria, mainly based on clinical patterns, helps to develop personalized strategies for management and prevention.
With a personalized medicine approach, phenotypes must be characterized to adapt to the management of patients suffering from Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis (HVA), including venom immunotherapy (VIT). In this systematic review, all articles mentioned systemic reactions with heterogeneous severity degrees. Half of those reported grade III-IV systemic reactions (Ring and Messmer). HVA clinical patterns could be worsened by one Hymenoptera sting, a patient's history with mast cell disorders, or cardiovascular diseases. VIT failure was attributed to bee venom extract and monotherapy in two-thirds of publications. Findings stress the difficulty of having uniform epidemiological data on HVA and the lack of financial support in some world regions to support appropriate management of these conditions. Although observing a heterogeneity of data, we were able to identify potential risk factors, in particular for the severe cases. We believe our work will support allergists and health professionals to implement improved personalized management of patients suffering from severe HVA.
本综述旨在确定蜂类毒液诱发过敏反应(HVA)的表型,重点关注不同视角(流行病学、临床和治疗),以调整未来的预防策略。
HVA 仍然是过敏反应的主要原因之一,症状广泛。尽管大多数病例发生在医疗保健环境之外,但数据表明,由于昆虫叮咬,急诊入院率很高。由于缺乏目击者以及识别体征和罪魁祸首的困难,死亡率往往被低估。针对危险因素可能是改善这些统计数据和疾病预后的线索。欧洲人群中严重 HVA 的潜在危险因素是基础血清类胰蛋白酶(BST)>8μg、肥大细胞疾病、无皮肤症状以及需要使用β受体阻滞剂和 ACE 抑制剂的心血管疾病。确定这些标准,主要基于临床模式,有助于为管理和预防制定个性化策略。
采用个性化医疗方法,必须对表型进行特征描述,以适应遭受蜂类毒液过敏反应(HVA)包括毒液免疫治疗(VIT)的患者的管理。在本次系统综述中,所有文章均提到了严重程度不同的全身性反应。其中一半报告了 III-IV 级全身性反应(Ring 和 Messmer)。蜂类蜇伤、肥大细胞疾病或心血管疾病病史可使 HVA 临床模式恶化。VIT 失败归因于三分之二的出版物中的蜂毒液提取物和单药治疗。研究结果强调了在 HVA 方面获得统一的流行病学数据的困难,以及在一些世界区域缺乏财务支持来支持对这些情况的适当管理。尽管数据存在异质性,但我们能够确定潜在的危险因素,特别是对于严重病例。我们相信我们的工作将支持过敏症专家和卫生专业人员实施对严重 HVA 患者进行改进的个性化管理。