• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国麻醉师协会伦理准则的演变。

The Evolution of the Ethical Guidelines of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Bioethics Committee, Good Samaritan Hospital, 2425 Samaritan Drive, San Jose, CA 95124, USA.

Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Yale Medical School, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiol Clin. 2024 Sep;42(3):367-376. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2023.12.004. Epub 2024 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.anclin.2023.12.004
PMID:39054013
Abstract

In 1992, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Ethics was formed primarily to address the rights of patients with existing Do-Not-Resuscitate orders presenting for anesthesia. Guidelines written for the ethical management of these patients stated that such orders should be reconsidered-not rescinded-thus respecting patient self-determination. The Committee also rewrote the reigning Guidelines for the Ethical Practice of Anesthesiology by expanding its ethical foundations to reflect the evolving climate of ethical opinions. These Guidelines described ethically appropriate conduct and behavior, including anesthesiologists' ethical responsibilities to patients, themselves, colleagues, health-care institutions, and community and society.

摘要

1992 年,美国麻醉医师协会伦理委员会成立,主要是为了处理带有“不复苏”医嘱的患者在接受麻醉时的权利问题。为了规范管理这些患者,委员会制定了相关指导方针,规定这些医嘱应该重新考虑,而不是撤销,以尊重患者的自主决定。委员会还通过扩大伦理基础,反映不断变化的伦理观点,重写了现行的《麻醉伦理实践指南》。这些指南描述了合乎伦理的适当行为,包括麻醉师对患者、自身、同事、医疗机构以及社区和社会的伦理责任。

相似文献

1
The Evolution of the Ethical Guidelines of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.美国麻醉师协会伦理准则的演变。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2024 Sep;42(3):367-376. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2023.12.004. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
2
[Ethical conflicts during anesthesia. "Do not resuscitate" orders in the operating room].[麻醉期间的伦理冲突。手术室中的“不要复苏”医嘱]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Apr;46(4):267-74. doi: 10.1007/s001010050400.
3
Patient and doctor attitudes and beliefs concerning perioperative do not resuscitate orders: anesthesiologists' growing compliance with patient autonomy and self determination guidelines.患者和医生对围手术期不复苏医嘱的态度和信念:麻醉师越来越遵守患者自主权和自我决定准则。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2013 Jan 15;13:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-2.
4
The Role of Anesthesiologists in Perioperative Limitation of Potentially Life-Sustaining Medical Treatments: A Narrative Review and Perspective.麻醉医生在围手术期限制潜在的维持生命的医疗治疗中的作用:叙述性综述与展望。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Sep 1;133(3):663-675. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005559.
5
Reviewing Ethical Guidelines for the Care of Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders after 30 Years: Rethinking Our Approach at a Time of Transition.审查 30 年后有“不复苏”医嘱的患者护理伦理准则:在转型时期重新思考我们的方法。
Anesthesiology. 2024 Sep 1;141(3):584-597. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005107.
6
The Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order in the perioperative setting: practical considerations.围手术期的不复苏(DNR)医嘱:实际考虑。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;34(2):141-144. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000974.
7
DNR orders in the OR.手术室中的“不要复苏”医嘱。
Hawaii Med J. 2001 Mar;60(3):64-7.
8
2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway.2022 年美国麻醉医师学会困难气道管理实践指南。
Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):31-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002.
9
Do-not-resuscitate orders for pediatric patients who require anesthesia and surgery.针对需要麻醉和手术的儿科患者的“不要复苏”医嘱。
Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):1686-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2119.
10
Ethical challenges of partial do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders: placing DNR orders in the context of a life-threatening conditions care plan.部分不进行心肺复苏(DNR)医嘱的伦理挑战:将DNR医嘱置于危及生命状况的护理计划背景下
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 27;163(19):2270-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.19.2270.