Suppr超能文献

一项比较中国结肠镜准备中低容量肠道准备效果的随机前瞻性研究。

A randomized prospective study comparing the effect of low-volume bowel preparations for colonoscopy preparation in China.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ningbo Medical Center Li Huili Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Xiangshan County First People's Hospital Medical Health Group, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep;59(9):1112-1119. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2024.2383276. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the effect of sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) and 3 L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) with or without dimethicone on bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted from April 2021 to December 2021, consecutive adult patients scheduled for colonoscopy were prospectively randomized into four groups: SPMC, SPMC plus dimethicone, 3 L PEG, and 3 L PEG plus dimethicone. Primary endpoint was colon cleansing based on Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary endpoints were bubble score, time to cecal intubation, adenoma detection rate (ADR), patient safety and compliance, and adverse events.

RESULTS

We enrolled 223 and 291 patients in SPMC and 3 L PEG group, respectively. The proportion with acceptable bowel cleansing, total BBPS score and cecal intubation time were similar in all four subgroups ( > 0.05). Patient-reported acceptability and tolerability was significantly greater in SPMC than 3 L PEG group ( < 0.001); adverse events were significantly lower in SPMC than latter group ( < 0.001). ADR in both groups was greater than 30%.

CONCLUSION

SPMC had significantly higher acceptability and tolerability than 3 L PEG, however, was similar in terms of bowel-cleansing effect and cecal intubation time and hence can be used before colonoscopy preparation.

摘要

目的

评估匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁(SPMC)与 3L 分剂量聚乙二醇(PEG)联合或不联合二甲硅油在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的效果。

方法

本多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照研究于 2021 年 4 月至 2021 年 12 月进行,连续纳入拟行结肠镜检查的成年患者,前瞻性随机分为 4 组:SPMC 组、SPMC 加二甲硅油组、3L PEG 组和 3L PEG 加二甲硅油组。主要终点为波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评估的肠道清洁度。次要终点为气泡评分、盲肠插管时间、腺瘤检出率(ADR)、患者安全性和依从性以及不良事件。

结果

SPMC 组和 3L PEG 组分别纳入 223 例和 291 例患者。4 个亚组的可接受肠道清洁率、总 BBPS 评分和盲肠插管时间差异均无统计学意义( > 0.05)。SPMC 组患者报告的可接受性和耐受性明显优于 3L PEG 组( < 0.001);SPMC 组不良事件发生率明显低于后者( < 0.001)。两组 ADR 均大于 30%。

结论

SPMC 的可接受性和耐受性明显优于 3L PEG,但肠道清洁效果和盲肠插管时间与后者相似,因此可用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验