Suppr超能文献

聚乙二醇4000与比沙可啶钠加氧化镁和柠檬酸用于儿童结肠镜检查前肠道准备的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Effectiveness and safety of polyethylene-glycol-4000 versus sodium picosulphate plus magnesium oxide and citric acid for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy in children: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

作者信息

Furio Silvia, Lucarini Alessio, Mennini Maurizio, Strisciuglio Caterina, Felici Enrico, Ferretti Alessandro, Parisi Pasquale, D'Angelo Francesco, Marasco Giovanni, Barbara Giovanni, Ricciardi Luca, Piccirillo Marisa, Di Nardo Giovanni

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Pediatric Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Surgical and Medical Department of Translational Medicine, General Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025 Jan;80(1):25-33. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12388. Epub 2024 Oct 13.

Abstract

Colonoscopy is performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The quality of colonoscopy depends on adequate bowel cleansing. However, there is no standardized protocol for bowel preparation in children. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to estimate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability profile of polyethylene glycol (PEG) compared with those of sodium picosulfate magnesium citrate (SPMC) in children. The primary sources of the reviewed studies were Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. The databases were systematically searched for RCTs comparing PEG 4000 to SPMC as a bowel cleansing solution. Six studies were included. The analysis showed that both PEG and SPMC are effective for bowel cleansing, while a split-dose regimen may be preferable to a day-before one. There were no differences between the two groups regarding adverse events (AEs) such as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, bloating, and anal discomfort. Additionally, preparation with SPMC was preferred in terms of acceptability and compliance. Still, the need to place a nasogastric tube was significantly lower in the SPMC group compared to the PEG group and in the split dose regimen compared to the day before. In conclusion, PEG and SPMC are equally effective in obtaining an adequate bowel cleansing with a comparable AE rate; moreover, split-dose administration may be preferable to day-before one in terms of effective bowel cleansing. However, SPMC preparation is more acceptable seems to result in higher compliance, and to reduce the use of a nasogastric tube, that we encounter daily in clinical practice, is perceived as a stressful experience for children and their families.

摘要

结肠镜检查用于诊断和治疗目的。结肠镜检查的质量取决于充分的肠道准备。然而,儿童肠道准备尚无标准化方案。我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估聚乙二醇(PEG)与匹可硫酸钠枸橼酸镁(SPMC)相比在儿童中的有效性、安全性和耐受性。综述研究的主要来源是Scopus、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆。系统检索数据库以查找比较PEG 4000与SPMC作为肠道清洁溶液的RCT。纳入了六项研究。分析表明,PEG和SPMC对肠道清洁均有效,而分次给药方案可能比前一天给药方案更可取。两组在腹痛、恶心、呕吐、腹胀和肛门不适等不良事件方面无差异。此外,在可接受性和依从性方面,SPMC准备更受青睐。不过,与PEG组相比,SPMC组放置鼻胃管的需求显著更低,与前一天给药方案相比,分次给药方案中放置鼻胃管的需求也更低。总之,PEG和SPMC在获得充分肠道清洁方面同样有效,不良事件发生率相当;此外,就有效的肠道清洁而言,分次给药可能比前一天给药更可取。然而,SPMC准备似乎更易接受,导致更高的依从性,并减少鼻胃管的使用,在临床实践中,我们每天都会遇到,鼻胃管的使用对儿童及其家庭来说是一种有压力的经历。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0c5/11717393/201d6c3aa5e9/JPN3-80-25-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验