Suppr超能文献

一项旨在改善急诊科急性心力衰竭患者护理的电子决策支持的试点试验。

Pilot trial of an electronic decision support to improve care for emergency department patients with acute heart failure.

作者信息

Sax Dana R, Mark Dustin G, Rana Jamal S, Huang Jie, Casey Scott D, Norris Robert P, Tillage Viliami, Reed Mary E

机构信息

The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, California, USA.

Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Pleasanton, California, USA.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):4432-4436. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14989. Epub 2024 Jul 25.

Abstract

AIMS

Emergency department (ED) providers play an important role in the management of patients with acute heart failure (AHF). We present findings from a pilot study of an electronic decision support that includes personalized risk estimates using the STRIDE-HF risk tool and tailored recommendations for initiating guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) among appropriate patients.

METHODS

Among ED patients treated for AHF who were discharged from the ED or the ED-based observation unit in two EDs from 1 January 2023 to 31 July 2023, we assess prescriptions to the four classes of GDMT at two intervals: (1) ED arrival and (2) ED discharge. Specifically, we report active prescriptions for beta-blockers (BBs), renin-angiotensin receptor system inhibitors (RASis), sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) among patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and mildly reduced (HFmrEF). Second, we describe rates of 30-day serious adverse events (SAE) (death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, balloon-pump insertion, intubation, new dialysis, myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization) among patients predicted to be very low risk by STRIDE-HF and discharged home.

RESULTS

Among 234 discharged patients, 55% were female and 76% were non-White. We found 51 (21.8%), 21 (9.0%) and 126 (53.8%) had HFrEF, HFmEF and HFpEF, respectively, while 36 (15.4%) were missing EF, and 51 (22%) were very low risk, 82 (35%) were low risk, 60 (26%) were medium risk and 41 (18%) were high risk. Among HFrEF patients, 68.6%, 66.7%, 25.5% and 19.6% were on a RASi, BB, SGLT2i and MRA, respectively, at ED arrival, while 42.9%, 66.7%, 14.3% and 4.8% of HFmrEF patients were on a RASi, BB, SGLT2i and MRA, respectively. Among patients with HFpEF, only 6 (4.8%) were on an SGLT2i at ED arrival. The most prescribed new medication at ED discharge was an SGLT2i, with a nearly 10% increase in the proportion of patients with an active prescription for SGLT2i at ED discharge among HFrEF and HFmEF patients. We observed no 30-day SAE among the 51 patients predicted to be very low risk and discharged home.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing treatment with GDMT at ED arrival was sub-optimal. Initiation among appropriate patients at discharge may be feasible and safe.

摘要

目的

急诊科医护人员在急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的管理中发挥着重要作用。我们展示了一项电子决策支持试点研究的结果,该研究包括使用STRIDE-HF风险工具进行个性化风险评估,以及针对合适患者启动指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)的定制建议。

方法

在2023年1月1日至2023年7月31日期间,从两个急诊科出院或从急诊科观察单元出院的AHF治疗患者中,我们在两个时间点评估四类GDMT的处方情况:(1)急诊科就诊时;(2)急诊科出院时。具体而言,我们报告射血分数降低(HFrEF)和轻度降低(HFmrEF)患者中β受体阻滞剂(BBs)、肾素-血管紧张素受体系统抑制剂(RASis)、钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)的有效处方。其次,我们描述STRIDE-HF预测为极低风险并出院回家的患者中30天严重不良事件(SAE)(死亡、心肺复苏、球囊泵置入、插管、新的透析、心肌梗死或冠状动脉血运重建)的发生率。

结果

在234名出院患者中,55%为女性,76%为非白人。我们发现分别有51名(21.8%)、21名(9.0%)和126名(53.8%)患者患有HFrEF、HFmEF和HFpEF,而36名(15.4%)患者射血分数缺失,51名(22%)患者为极低风险,82名(35%)患者为低风险,60名(26%)患者为中度风险,41名(18%)患者为高风险。在HFrEF患者中,急诊科就诊时分别有68.6%、66.7%、25.5%和19.6%的患者使用RASi、BB、SGLT2i和MRA,而HFmrEF患者中分别有42.9%、66.7%、14.3%和4.8%的患者使用RASi、BB、SGLT2i和MRA。在HFpEF患者中,急诊科就诊时只有6名(4.8%)患者使用SGLT2i。急诊科出院时最常开具的新药是SGLT2i,HFrEF和HFmEF患者中SGLT2i有效处方患者的比例在急诊科出院时增加了近10%。在51名预测为极低风险并出院回家的患者中,我们未观察到30天SAE。

结论

急诊科就诊时GDMT的持续治疗未达最佳水平。在合适患者出院时启动治疗可能是可行且安全的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dce/11631321/778493533b25/EHF2-11-4432-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验