Riley Kylie W, Burke Kimberly, Dixon Holly, Holmes Darrell, Calero Lehyla, Barton Michael, Miller Rachel L, Bramer Lisa M, Waters Katrina M, Anderson Kim A, Herbstman Julie, Rohlman Diana
Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Environ Health Insights. 2024 Jul 24;18:11786302241262604. doi: 10.1177/11786302241262604. eCollection 2024.
Report-back of research results (RBRR) is becoming standard practice for environmental health research studies. RBRR is thought to increase environmental health literacy (EHL), although standardized measurements are limited. For this study, we developed a report back document on exposure to air pollutants, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, during pregnancy through community engaged research and evaluated whether the report increased EHL. We used focus groups and surveys to gather feedback on the report document from an initial group of study participants (Group 1, n = 22) and then sent the revised report to a larger number of participants (Group 2, n = 168). We conducted focus groups among participants in Group 1 and discussed their suggested changes to the report and how those changes could be implemented. Participants in focus groups demonstrated multiple levels of EHL. While participant engagement critically informed report development, a survey comparing feedback from Group 1 (initial report) and Group 2 (revised report) did not show a significant difference in the ease of reading the report or knowledge gained about air pollutants. We acknowledge that our approach was limited by a lack of EHL tools that assess knowledge and behavior change, and a reliance on quantitative methodologies. Future approaches that merge qualitative and quantitative methodologies to evaluate RBRR and methodologies for assessing RBRR materials and subsequent changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behavior, may be necessary.
研究结果反馈(RBRR)正成为环境卫生研究的标准做法。尽管标准化测量有限,但RBRR被认为可以提高环境卫生素养(EHL)。在本研究中,我们通过社区参与研究编写了一份关于孕期接触空气污染物多环芳烃的反馈文件,并评估该报告是否提高了环境卫生素养。我们使用焦点小组和调查从最初的一组研究参与者(第1组,n = 22)中收集对报告文件的反馈,然后将修订后的报告发送给更多参与者(第2组,n = 168)。我们在第1组的参与者中进行了焦点小组讨论,讨论他们对报告的建议修改以及如何实施这些修改。焦点小组的参与者展示了多个层次的环境卫生素养。虽然参与者的参与对报告的制定起到了关键作用,但一项比较第1组(初始报告)和第2组(修订报告)反馈的调查显示,在报告的易读性或对空气污染物的了解方面没有显著差异。我们承认,我们的方法受到缺乏评估知识和行为变化的环境卫生素养工具以及对定量方法的依赖的限制。未来可能需要采用将定性和定量方法相结合的方法来评估研究结果反馈以及评估研究结果反馈材料和随后知识、态度和行为变化的方法。