• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

壳聚糖添加到树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀中对牙本质抗剪粘结强度的影响(一项对比研究)。

Effect of Incorporating Chitosan to Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Shear Bond Strength to Dentin (An Comparative Study).

作者信息

Khudhair Aya Tahseen, Khalaf Muna Saleem

机构信息

Pedodontic Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Pedodontic & Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

出版信息

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Jun 27;14(3):225-232. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_195_23. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.

DOI:10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_195_23
PMID:39055292
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11268534/
Abstract

AIM

Resin-modified glass ionomer cement tends to shrink due to polymerization of the resin component. Additionally, they are more prone to syneresis and imbibition during the setting process. This study evaluates the impact of chitosan, a biopolymer that is, both biomaterial and biocompatible, on the strength of dentin bonding and compares it with ACTIVA Bio-ACTIVE Restorative. The present study was aimed to assess the impact of including chitosan into Fuji II on the shear bond strength between. the restoration material and tooth dentin, in contrast to Bioactiva in permanent teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 30 premolar teeth were recently extracted. The study involved three distinct sample groups. Group 1 (10 teeth) is the negative control (Fuji II), Group 2 (10 teeth) is the positive control (ACTIVA Bio-ACTIVE Restorative), and Group 3 (10 teeth) is treated with a mixture of Chitosan and Fuji II (CH-Fuji II). Each tooth's buccal and palatal cusps were eliminated to achieve a horizontal surface. Using a periodontal probe, 1.5 mm from the mesial pit to the mesial marginal ridge were removed. Restoration was implemented in all groups following manufacturer directions. Thermocycling the teeth by immersing them in a water bath with temperatures ranging from 5°C to 55°C (± 1-2°C) for 30 s (500 cycles). Each sample was attached to the universal testing machine's jig at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. Shear force was used until breakage, and the bond's adhesive strength was then calculated. Statistical analysis using ANOVA with Dunnett's T3 test. Results were significant at < 0.05.

RESULTS

Statistically significant difference was present between Chitosan and Fuji II and between Chitosan and Activa by reducing the shear bond strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of chitosan to Fuji II had a negative effect on the shear bond with a significant difference while Activa and Fuji II exhibited favorable shear bond strength.

摘要

目的

树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀往往会因树脂成分的聚合而收缩。此外,它们在凝固过程中更容易出现脱水收缩和吸湿现象。本研究评估了壳聚糖(一种既是生物材料又具有生物相容性的生物聚合物)对牙本质粘结强度的影响,并将其与ACTIVA生物活性修复材料进行比较。本研究旨在评估在富士II型材料中加入壳聚糖对修复材料与牙齿牙本质之间剪切粘结强度的影响,与恒牙中的生物活性材料形成对比。

材料与方法

共收集30颗近期拔除的前磨牙。该研究涉及三个不同的样本组。第1组(10颗牙齿)为阴性对照组(富士II型),第2组(10颗牙齿)为阳性对照组(ACTIVA生物活性修复材料),第3组(10颗牙齿)用壳聚糖与富士II型的混合物(CH-富士II型)处理。去除每颗牙齿的颊尖和腭尖以获得水平表面。使用牙周探针,从近中窝到近中边缘嵴去除1.5毫米。按照制造商说明在所有组中进行修复。将牙齿置于温度范围为5°C至55°C(±1 - 2°C)的水浴中30秒(500个循环)进行热循环。每个样本以1毫米/分钟的十字头速度连接到万能试验机的夹具上。使用剪切力直至断裂,然后计算粘结的粘结强度。采用方差分析和邓尼特T3检验进行统计分析。结果在<0.05时具有显著性。

结果

壳聚糖与富士II型之间以及壳聚糖与Activa之间在降低剪切粘结强度方面存在统计学显著差异。

结论

在富士II型中添加壳聚糖对剪切粘结有负面影响,差异显著,而Activa和富士II型表现出良好的剪切粘结强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2d/11268534/7ebe919556fb/JISPCD-14-225-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2d/11268534/eff9ce6020ad/JISPCD-14-225-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2d/11268534/fb32176a36c1/JISPCD-14-225-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2d/11268534/7ebe919556fb/JISPCD-14-225-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2d/11268534/eff9ce6020ad/JISPCD-14-225-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2d/11268534/fb32176a36c1/JISPCD-14-225-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be2d/11268534/7ebe919556fb/JISPCD-14-225-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Incorporating Chitosan to Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement on Shear Bond Strength to Dentin (An Comparative Study).壳聚糖添加到树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀中对牙本质抗剪粘结强度的影响(一项对比研究)。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Jun 27;14(3):225-232. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_195_23. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
2
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study.硅酸三钙基修复材料与不透射线的后牙玻璃离子修复水门汀在乳牙和恒牙中抗剪切粘结强度及微渗漏的比较评价:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014 Oct-Dec;32(4):304-10. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.140952.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an Study.生物活性修复材料、氧化锆增强玻璃离子水门汀和传统玻璃离子水门汀与乳磨牙牙本质表面剪切粘结强度的比较评价:一项研究。
J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Dec;22(4):260-266. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87115.1230.
4
Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cements.牙本质表面处理对玻璃离子水门汀抗剪粘结强度的影响。
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014 Mar 31;5(1):15-22. eCollection 2014 Jan.
5
Shear bond strength of resin-modified restorative glass-ionomer cements to dentin--an in vitro study.树脂改性修复性玻璃离子水门汀与牙本质的剪切粘结强度——一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1998 Dec;16(4):130-3.
6
Effect of Bioinductive Cavity Liners on Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite to Dentin.生物诱导腔衬对牙本质与牙复合树脂粘结剪切强度的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 18;2022:3283211. doi: 10.1155/2022/3283211. eCollection 2022.
7
Marginal microleakage and modified microtensile bond strength of Activa Bioactive, in comparison with conventional restorative materials.活性生物玻璃的边缘微渗漏和改良微拉伸粘结强度与传统修复材料的比较。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Feb;8(1):329-335. doi: 10.1002/cre2.534. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
8
Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems.树脂复合材料与近期高粘度玻璃离子水门汀之间的抗剪粘结强度和界面分析,以及各种粘结系统的粘结效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jun;23(6):2599-2608. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2678-5. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
9
Effect of Self-etching Adhesives on the Bond Strength of Glass-Ionomer Cements.自酸蚀粘结剂对玻璃离子水门汀粘结强度的影响。
J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Nov;11(6):680-6. Epub 2014 Nov 30.
10
Interfacial Bond Strength and Morphology of Sound and Caries-affected Dentin Surfaces Bonded to Two Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements.两种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀修复 Sound 及龋损牙本质的界面粘结强度和形态。
Oper Dent. 2022 Jul 1;47(4):E188-E196. doi: 10.2341/21-048-L.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioactive restorative materials in dentistry: a comprehensive review of mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions.牙科生物活性修复材料:作用机制、临床应用及未来方向的全面综述
Odontology. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01162-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Chitosan-induced biomodification on demineralized dentin to improve the adhesive interface.壳聚糖诱导的脱矿牙本质生物改性以改善粘结界面。
Restor Dent Endod. 2022 Jun 15;47(3):e28. doi: 10.5395/rde.2022.47.e28. eCollection 2022 Aug.
2
Interfacial Bond Strength and Morphology of Sound and Caries-affected Dentin Surfaces Bonded to Two Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements.两种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀修复 Sound 及龋损牙本质的界面粘结强度和形态。
Oper Dent. 2022 Jul 1;47(4):E188-E196. doi: 10.2341/21-048-L.
3
Evaluation of Fluoride Release in Chitosan-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements.
壳聚糖改性玻璃离聚物水泥中氟化物释放的评价。
Int Dent J. 2022 Dec;72(6):785-791. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
Evaluation of Adhesive Bond Strength, and the Sustained Release of Fluoride by Chitosan-infused Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: An Study.壳聚糖注入型树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的粘结强度及氟化物缓释评估:一项研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):254-257. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1943.
5
An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements.手动混合和封装玻璃离子水门汀物理性能的体外评估。
BDJ Open. 2020 Aug 11;6:12. doi: 10.1038/s41405-020-0040-x. eCollection 2020.
6
Commercially Available Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials: A Review and a Proposal for Classification.市售含氟修复材料:综述与分类建议
Materials (Basel). 2020 May 18;13(10):2313. doi: 10.3390/ma13102313.
7
The microtensile bond strength test: Its historical background and application to bond testing.微拉伸粘结强度测试:其历史背景及在粘结测试中的应用。
Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020 Dec;56(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
8
Effects of silver diammine fluoride on bond strength of adhesives to sound dentin.氟化银氨对粘合剂与健康牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2018 Nov 30;37(6):1003-1009. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-401. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
9
In Vitro Fracture Resistance of Adhesively Restored Molar Teeth with Different MOD Cavity Dimensions.不同 MOD 洞型尺寸黏结修复后磨牙的体外抗折性能。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e325-e331. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12777. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
10
Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials.含氟牙科修复材料的特性研究
Dent Mater J. 2018 Mar 30;37(2):293-300. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-161. Epub 2017 Dec 27.