Li Hong, Yao Wei, Xue Xiao'ao, Li Yunxia, Hua Yinghui
Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2023 Oct 10;34:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2023.09.001. eCollection 2023 Oct.
The treatment for Achilles tendinopathy varies widely, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for both non-insertional and insertional Achilles tendinopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of insertional and non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy (AT).
Sixty patients with AT were invited to participate in this study. Patients were allocated to one of two groups according to the site of the AT, including an insertional AT (IAT) group and a non-insertional AT (NIAT) group. ESWT was performed once a week for five weeks for both groups. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire (VISA-A) score and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used five times to evaluate the clinical outcomes, including before treatment, immediately after treatment, as well as one month, three months, and five years after treatment.
At three months after treatment, the IAT group exhibited a significantly higher VISA-A score (82 ± 6 76 ± 11; = 0.01) and a significantly lower VAS score (1 ± 1 2 ± 1; < 0.001) when compared with the NIAT group. At the five-year assessment, the IAT group (1 ± 1) had a significantly lower VAS score than the NIAT group (2 ± 1) ( = 0.02), while no significant difference for the VISA-A score was observed between the groups (84 ± 8 84 ± 10; = 0.98).
Extracorporeal shock wave treatment can improve the symptoms of both insertional and non-insertional AT. The IAT patients experienced better clinical outcomes compared with the NIAT patients.
跟腱病的治疗方法差异很大,对于非止点性和止点性跟腱病的最佳治疗方法尚无共识。本研究的目的是评估体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗止点性和非止点性跟腱病(AT)的临床疗效。
邀请60例跟腱病患者参与本研究。根据跟腱病的部位,将患者分为两组,包括止点性跟腱病(IAT)组和非止点性跟腱病(NIAT)组。两组均每周进行一次ESWT,共进行五周。使用维多利亚运动评估-跟腱问卷(VISA-A)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)五次评估临床结果,包括治疗前、治疗后即刻以及治疗后1个月、3个月和5年。
治疗后3个月,与NIAT组相比,IAT组的VISA-A评分显著更高(82±6对76±11;P=0.01),VAS评分显著更低(1±1对2±1;P<0.001)。在5年评估时,IAT组(1±1)的VAS评分显著低于NIAT组(2±1)(P=0.02),而两组之间的VISA-A评分未观察到显著差异(84±8对84±10;P=0.98)。
体外冲击波治疗可改善止点性和非止点性跟腱病的症状。与NIAT患者相比,IAT患者的临床结局更好。