Davis B W, Gelber R, Goldhirsch A, Hartmann W H, Hollaway L, Russell I, Rudenstam C M
Hum Pathol. 1985 Dec;16(12):1212-8. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(85)80033-2.
To assess the prognostic significance of peritumoral vessel invasion, data were examined for 1,510 women entered into the Ludwig Breast Cancer Group Trials I to IV evaluating adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer with axillary nodal metastasis. Vessel invasion by tumor cells was identified by routine light microscopy in 59 per cent (889 of 1,510) of the patients and was equally distributed between premenopausal/perimenopausal (60 per cent, 468 of 778) and postmenopausal (58 per cent, 421 of 732) women. In logrank analyses stratified by nodal status (one to three or four or more positive nodes), the four-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was significantly lower in patients with vessel invasion than in women without vessel invasion (50 per cent versus 65 per cent, P less than 0.0001). This DFS difference was seen for both premenopausal/perimenopausal (P = 0.0004) and postmenopausal (P = 0.0002) patients. The four-year overall survival rate was also lower in patients with vessel invasion (71 per cent versus 82 per cent, P = 0.0006), both for premenopausal/perimenopausal (P = 0.002) and postmenopausal (P = 0.04) women. The presence of vessel invasion was significantly associated with increasing numbers of positive axillary lymph nodes, rising tumor grade, nonstellate tumor border growth pattern, and higher steroid hormone receptor content of the primary tumor. The assessment of peritumoral vessel invasion continued to have prognostic significance for DFS (P less than 0.0001) and overall survival (P = 0.003) when evaluated in multivariate models controlling for treatment assigned, nodal status, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, menopausal status, and age. Depending on the subpopulation, patients with vessel invasion had a 41 per cent to 54 per cent greater risk of treatment failure than those without vessel invasion and a 29 per cent to 64 per cent greater risk of death. The percentage of treatment failures at distant sites was higher for women with than for those without vessel invasion (27 per cent versus 18 per cent, P = 0.003). In patients with axillary lymph node metastases, peritumoral vessel invasion may be a sign of increased systemic disease burden.
为评估肿瘤周围血管侵犯的预后意义,我们对1510名参加路德维希乳腺癌协作组试验I至IV的女性数据进行了分析,这些试验旨在评估可手术切除且伴有腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌的辅助治疗。通过常规光学显微镜检查,在59%(1510例中的889例)的患者中发现肿瘤细胞侵犯血管,且在绝经前/围绝经期女性(60%,778例中的468例)和绝经后女性(58%,732例中的421例)中分布均衡。在按淋巴结状态分层的对数秩分析中(1至3个或4个及以上阳性淋巴结),血管侵犯患者的4年无病生存率(DFS)显著低于无血管侵犯的女性(50%对65%,P<0.0001)。绝经前/围绝经期患者(P = 0.0004)和绝经后患者(P = 0.0002)均出现这种DFS差异。血管侵犯患者的4年总生存率也较低(71%对82%,P = 0.0006),绝经前/围绝经期女性(P = 0.002)和绝经后女性(P = 0.04)均如此。血管侵犯的存在与腋窝阳性淋巴结数量增加、肿瘤分级升高、肿瘤边界非星状生长模式以及原发肿瘤更高的类固醇激素受体含量显著相关。在控制了所分配的治疗、淋巴结状态、肿瘤大小、雌激素受体状态、绝经状态和年龄的多变量模型中评估时,肿瘤周围血管侵犯的评估对DFS(P<0.0001)和总生存率(P = 0.003)仍具有预后意义。根据亚组不同,有血管侵犯的患者治疗失败风险比无血管侵犯的患者高41%至54%,死亡风险高29%至64%。有血管侵犯的女性远处部位治疗失败的百分比高于无血管侵犯的女性(27%对18%,P = 0.003)。在有腋窝淋巴结转移的患者中,肿瘤周围血管侵犯可能是全身疾病负担增加的一个迹象。