Davis B W, Gelber R D, Goldhirsch A, Hartmann W H, Locher G W, Reed R, Golouh R, Säve-Söderbergh J, Holloway L, Russell I
Cancer. 1986 Dec 15;58(12):2662-70. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861215)58:12<2662::aid-cncr2820581219>3.0.co;2-y.
The prognostic significance of histologic tumor grade has been evaluated in 1537 women entered into the Ludwig Trials I-IV of adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer. Tumor grade was determined on histologic review of primary tumor sections by two central review pathologists using a modification of the Bloom and Richardson grading system. The 5-year overall survival rates (+/- SE) were: Grade 1, 86% +/- 2; Grade 2, 70% +/- 2; and Grade 3, 57% +/- 2 (P less than 0.0001). This survival difference was seen in both premenopausal (P less than 0.0001) and postmenopausal (P less than 0.0001) women. Significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) by tumor grade were also observed (P less than 0.0001). The tumor grade determined by the 75 contributing local clinic pathologists was also highly significant for predicting DFS and overall survival. Tumor grade remained a statistically significant prognostic factor for DFS (P less than 0.0001) and overall survival (P less than 0.0001) in multivariate analyses controlling for nodal status, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, menopausal status, age, peritumoral vessel invasion, and treatment assigned. In postmenopausal patients for whom adjuvant treatment was compared with no adjuvant therapy, the prognostic significance of tumor grade was modified by the effect of treatment. The presence of vessel invasion by primary tumor cells was a stronger predictor of early recurrence than was increasing tumor grade in postmenopausal patients who received no adjuvant therapy. The higher failure rates for patients with high-grade tumors was due to a larger number of failures in regional and visceral sites. Tumor grade can be determined by any pathologist and allows for selection of a subpopulation of breast cancer patients at high risk for early mortality.
对1537名参加路德维希乳腺癌辅助治疗试验I-IV期的淋巴结阳性乳腺癌女性患者,评估了组织学肿瘤分级的预后意义。由两名中心阅片病理学家采用改良的布鲁姆和理查森分级系统,对原发性肿瘤切片进行组织学检查来确定肿瘤分级。5年总生存率(±标准误)分别为:1级,86%±2;2级,70%±2;3级,57%±2(P<0.0001)。这种生存差异在绝经前女性(P<0.0001)和绝经后女性(P<0.0001)中均可见。还观察到不同肿瘤分级的无病生存率(DFS)有显著差异(P<0.0001)。75名参与研究的当地临床病理学家确定的肿瘤分级,对预测DFS和总生存也具有高度显著性。在控制淋巴结状态、肿瘤大小、雌激素受体状态、绝经状态、年龄、肿瘤周围血管侵犯和所分配治疗的多因素分析中,肿瘤分级仍然是DFS(P<0.0001)和总生存(P<0.0001)的统计学显著预后因素。在比较辅助治疗与不进行辅助治疗的绝经后患者中,肿瘤分级的预后意义因治疗效果而改变。在未接受辅助治疗的绝经后患者中,原发性肿瘤细胞的血管侵犯比肿瘤分级增加更能预测早期复发。高级别肿瘤患者较高的失败率是由于区域和内脏部位的失败病例较多。任何病理学家都可以确定肿瘤分级,这有助于选择早期死亡风险高的乳腺癌患者亚群。