Efstathiou Nikolaos, Guo Ping, Walker Wendy, MacArtney John I, Bailey Cara
University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Birmingham, UK.
School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
J Palliat Care. 2025 Jul;40(3):258-265. doi: 10.1177/08258597241264455. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
ObjectiveIdentifying research priorities is very important for palliative and end-of-life care to ensure research is focused on evidence gaps. This project aimed to identify and prioritise palliative and end-of-life care research areas within the West Midlands region in United Kingdom (UK).MethodsA modified Delphi technique approach was used with palliative care stakeholders. The first round was item generation via rapid interviews. Data were analysed using content analysis and all the items were grouped into main categories. For round two, an online survey was conducted to present all the items from round one, and stakeholders were asked to rate the priority of items on a Likert-type scale (1 = not a priority to 7 = essential priority). Items that achieved consensus in round two were presented to the third round, where stakeholders ranked them in descending order.ResultsWe completed and analysed 56 rapid interviews which resulted in 158 research items under 15 categories. The research items were rated by 30 stakeholders and seven items which reached consensus were subsequently ranked in order by 45 stakeholders. The highest ranked item was 'Integrated care systems to prevent crisis', followed by three research items related to 'equity' in palliative care.ConclusionsOur research priorities, although unique for our region, mirror previously research priorities from other regions and countries. This suggests issues of integration and equity in palliative and end-of-life care remain unresolved, despite ongoing initiatives and research to address these issues.
目的
确定研究重点对于姑息治疗和临终关怀非常重要,以确保研究聚焦于证据空白。本项目旨在确定英国西米德兰兹地区姑息治疗和临终关怀的研究领域并确定其优先级。
方法
采用改良的德尔菲技术方法与姑息治疗利益相关者进行。第一轮通过快速访谈生成项目。使用内容分析法对数据进行分析,并将所有项目归为主要类别。在第二轮中,进行了一项在线调查,展示第一轮中的所有项目,并要求利益相关者在李克特量表(1 = 非优先事项至7 = 至关重要的优先事项)上对项目的优先级进行评分。在第二轮中达成共识的项目进入第三轮,利益相关者将它们按降序排列。
结果
我们完成并分析了56次快速访谈,产生了15个类别的158个研究项目。30名利益相关者对这些研究项目进行了评分,随后45名利益相关者对达成共识的7个项目进行了排序。排名最高的项目是“预防危机的综合护理系统”,其次是三个与姑息治疗中的“公平性”相关的研究项目。
结论
我们的研究重点虽然是我们地区独有的,但反映了其他地区和国家以前的研究重点。这表明,尽管一直在采取举措和进行研究来解决这些问题,但姑息治疗和临终关怀中的整合与公平问题仍未得到解决。