• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Setting Regional Priorities for Palliative and End-of-Life Care Research Using a Delphi Technique Approach.采用德尔菲技术法确定姑息治疗和临终关怀研究的区域优先事项。
J Palliat Care. 2025 Jul;40(3):258-265. doi: 10.1177/08258597241264455. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Palliative Care Research and Clinical Practice Priorities in the United States as Identified by an Interdisciplinary Modified Delphi Approach.美国多学科改良德尔菲法确定的姑息治疗研究和临床实践重点。
J Palliat Med. 2024 Sep;27(9):1135-1145. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0664. Epub 2024 May 10.
3
Establishing a set of research priorities in care homes for older people in the UK: a modified Delphi consensus study with care home staff.确定英国养老院老年人护理的一系列研究重点:一项与养老院工作人员开展的改良德尔菲共识研究
Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):284-290. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw204.
4
Research priorities of the Canadian chiropractic profession: a consensus study using a modified Delphi technique.加拿大整脊疗法行业的研究重点:一项采用改良德尔菲技术的共识研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2017 Dec 12;25:38. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0169-4. eCollection 2017.
5
Regional Priorities in Palliative Care Research: Adapting the Delphi Technique for the Philippines.姑息治疗研究中的区域重点:将德尔菲技术应用于菲律宾
J Palliat Care. 2025 Jul;40(3):266-267. doi: 10.1177/08258597241301134. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
6
Research priorities relating to the debate on assisted dying: what do we still need to know? Results of a modified Delphi technique.与安乐死辩论相关的研究重点:我们仍需了解什么?改良德尔菲技术的结果
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 7;6(6):e012213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012213.
7
Achieving consensus on priority items for paediatric palliative care outcome measurement: Results from a modified Delphi survey, engagement with a children's research involvement group and expert item generation.达成儿科姑息治疗结局测量优先事项共识:一项改良 Delphi 调查、与儿童研究参与小组的互动以及专家项目生成的结果。
Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1509-1519. doi: 10.1177/02692163231205126. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
8
Developing a Research Agenda for Adult Palliative Care: A Modified Delphi Study.制定成人姑息治疗研究议程:一项改良德尔菲研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 May;22(5):480-488. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0462. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
9
Priorities for global research into children's palliative care: results of an International Delphi Study.儿童姑息治疗全球研究的优先事项:一项国际德尔菲研究的结果
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Aug 4;14:36. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0031-1.
10
A network approach to addressing the needs of patients with incurable head and neck cancer and their families.一种满足无法治愈的头颈癌患者及其家属需求的网络方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Apr 30:1-29. doi: 10.3310/TKLD6486.

本文引用的文献

1
Conducting rapid qualitative interview research during the COVID-19 pandemic-Reflections on methodological choices.在新冠疫情期间开展快速定性访谈研究——关于方法选择的思考
Front Sociol. 2022 Aug 11;7:953872. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.953872. eCollection 2022.
2
Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review.让利益相关者参与研究优先级设定:一项范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 29;7(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00318-6.
3
Global palliative care research (2002-2020): bibliometric review and mapping analysis.全球姑息治疗研究(2002-2020):文献计量学回顾与图谱分析。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;12(4):376-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002982. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
4
Priorities and opportunities for palliative and end of life care in United Kingdom health policies: a national documentary analysis.英国卫生政策中姑息治疗和临终关怀的优先事项和机遇:国家文献分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jul 14;20(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00802-6.
5
A realist evaluation of a "single point of contact" end-of-life care service.“单一联系点”临终关怀服务的实际评估。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 May 25;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2019-0218.
6
International palliative care research priorities: A systematic review.国际姑息治疗研究重点:系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Feb 3;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0520-8.
7
Integrated Palliative Care for Nursing Home Residents: Exploring the Challenges in the Collaboration between Nursing Homes, Home Care and Hospitals.养老院居民的综合姑息治疗:探索养老院、家庭护理和医院之间合作的挑战。
Int J Integr Care. 2019 Apr 3;19(2):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4186.
8
Association of Care at Minority-Serving vs Non-Minority-Serving Hospitals With Use of Palliative Care Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities With Metastatic Cancer in the United States.美国少数民族服务医院与非少数民族服务医院之间的护理关系与少数民族转移性癌症患者姑息治疗的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e187633. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7633.
9
Developing a Research Agenda for Adult Palliative Care: A Modified Delphi Study.制定成人姑息治疗研究议程:一项改良德尔菲研究。
J Palliat Med. 2019 May;22(5):480-488. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0462. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
10
It's Time to Talk: Challenges in Providing Integrated Palliative Care in Advanced Congestive Heart Failure. A Narrative Review.是时候展开讨论了:晚期充血性心力衰竭患者提供综合姑息治疗面临的挑战。一篇叙述性综述。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2018;14(2):128-137. doi: 10.2174/1573403X14666180123165203.

采用德尔菲技术法确定姑息治疗和临终关怀研究的区域优先事项。

Setting Regional Priorities for Palliative and End-of-Life Care Research Using a Delphi Technique Approach.

作者信息

Efstathiou Nikolaos, Guo Ping, Walker Wendy, MacArtney John I, Bailey Cara

机构信息

University of Birmingham, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Birmingham, UK.

School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

J Palliat Care. 2025 Jul;40(3):258-265. doi: 10.1177/08258597241264455. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1177/08258597241264455
PMID:39056368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12130606/
Abstract

ObjectiveIdentifying research priorities is very important for palliative and end-of-life care to ensure research is focused on evidence gaps. This project aimed to identify and prioritise palliative and end-of-life care research areas within the West Midlands region in United Kingdom (UK).MethodsA modified Delphi technique approach was used with palliative care stakeholders. The first round was item generation via rapid interviews. Data were analysed using content analysis and all the items were grouped into main categories. For round two, an online survey was conducted to present all the items from round one, and stakeholders were asked to rate the priority of items on a Likert-type scale (1 = not a priority to 7 = essential priority). Items that achieved consensus in round two were presented to the third round, where stakeholders ranked them in descending order.ResultsWe completed and analysed 56 rapid interviews which resulted in 158 research items under 15 categories. The research items were rated by 30 stakeholders and seven items which reached consensus were subsequently ranked in order by 45 stakeholders. The highest ranked item was 'Integrated care systems to prevent crisis', followed by three research items related to 'equity' in palliative care.ConclusionsOur research priorities, although unique for our region, mirror previously research priorities from other regions and countries. This suggests issues of integration and equity in palliative and end-of-life care remain unresolved, despite ongoing initiatives and research to address these issues.

摘要

目的

确定研究重点对于姑息治疗和临终关怀非常重要,以确保研究聚焦于证据空白。本项目旨在确定英国西米德兰兹地区姑息治疗和临终关怀的研究领域并确定其优先级。

方法

采用改良的德尔菲技术方法与姑息治疗利益相关者进行。第一轮通过快速访谈生成项目。使用内容分析法对数据进行分析,并将所有项目归为主要类别。在第二轮中,进行了一项在线调查,展示第一轮中的所有项目,并要求利益相关者在李克特量表(1 = 非优先事项至7 = 至关重要的优先事项)上对项目的优先级进行评分。在第二轮中达成共识的项目进入第三轮,利益相关者将它们按降序排列。

结果

我们完成并分析了56次快速访谈,产生了15个类别的158个研究项目。30名利益相关者对这些研究项目进行了评分,随后45名利益相关者对达成共识的7个项目进行了排序。排名最高的项目是“预防危机的综合护理系统”,其次是三个与姑息治疗中的“公平性”相关的研究项目。

结论

我们的研究重点虽然是我们地区独有的,但反映了其他地区和国家以前的研究重点。这表明,尽管一直在采取举措和进行研究来解决这些问题,但姑息治疗和临终关怀中的整合与公平问题仍未得到解决。