Suppr超能文献

达成儿科姑息治疗结局测量优先事项共识:一项改良 Delphi 调查、与儿童研究参与小组的互动以及专家项目生成的结果。

Achieving consensus on priority items for paediatric palliative care outcome measurement: Results from a modified Delphi survey, engagement with a children's research involvement group and expert item generation.

机构信息

King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, London, UK.

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1509-1519. doi: 10.1177/02692163231205126. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no validated outcome measure for use in children's palliative care outside sub-Saharan Africa. Stakeholders must be involved in the development of such measures to ensure face and content validity.

AIM

To gain expert stakeholder consensus on items for inclusion in a paediatric palliative care outcome measure to establish face and content validity.

DESIGN

This study was conducted in two phases following Rothrock and COSMIN guidance on patient-reported outcome measure development. Phase 1: Three-round modified Delphi survey to establish consensus on priority items. Phase 2: Item generation meeting with key stakeholders to develop initial measure versions. A young person's advisory group was also consulted on priority outcomes.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Delphi survey: Parents and professionals with experience of caring for a child with a life-limiting condition. Young person's advisory group: young people age 10-20 years. Item generation meeting: bereaved parents, academics and clinicians.

RESULTS

Phase 1: Delphi survey ( = 82). Agreement increased from Kendall's  = 0.17 to  = 0.61, indicating movement towards consensus. Agreement between professional and parent ranking was poor (Cohen's kappa 0.13). Professionals prioritised physical symptoms, whereas parents prioritised psychosocial and practical concerns. Advisory group: Children ( = 22) prioritised items related to living a 'normal life' in addition to items prioritised by adult participants. Phase 2: Five age/developmental stage appropriate child and proxy-reported versions of C-POS, containing 13 items, were drafted.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance and feasibility of involving key stakeholders in PROM item generation, as important differences were found in the priority outcomes identified by children, parents and professionals.

摘要

背景

在撒哈拉以南非洲地区之外,没有经过验证的适用于儿童姑息治疗的结局测量工具。制定此类测量工具时必须让利益攸关方参与其中,以确保其具有表面有效性和内容有效性。

目的

在儿童姑息治疗结局测量工具中纳入项目,以获得专家利益攸关方的共识,从而建立表面有效性和内容有效性。

设计

本研究按照罗斯克罗和 COSMIN 关于患者报告结局测量工具开发的指南分两个阶段进行。第 1 阶段:三轮改良 Delphi 调查,以确定优先项目的共识。第 2 阶段:与主要利益攸关方举行项目生成会议,以制定初始测量版本。还就优先结果咨询了青年咨询小组。

地点和参与者

Delphi 调查:有照顾患有绝症儿童经验的父母和专业人员。青年咨询小组:10-20 岁的年轻人。项目生成会议:失去孩子的父母、学者和临床医生。

结果

第 1 阶段:Delphi 调查(n=82)。意见的一致性从肯德尔的 0.17 增加到 0.61,表明意见越来越趋于一致。专业人员和父母的排名之间的一致性较差(Cohen 的 kappa 为 0.13)。专业人员优先考虑身体症状,而父母则优先考虑心理社会和实际问题。咨询小组:儿童(n=22)除了成人参与者优先考虑的项目外,还优先考虑与“正常生活”相关的项目。第 2 阶段:起草了包含 13 个项目的 C-POS 的 5 个适合年龄/发育阶段的儿童和代理报告版本。

结论

本研究强调了让关键利益攸关方参与制定 PROM 项目的重要性和可行性,因为儿童、父母和专业人员确定的优先结果存在重要差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f8a/10657511/bc16c2edbc1e/10.1177_02692163231205126-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验