Chang Yu, He Bijing, DeMaranville Justin, Wongpakaran Nahathai, Wedding Danny, Wongpakaran Tinakon
Multidisciplinary and Interdisciplinary School (MIdS), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Jun 26;14(7):1902-1912. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14070126.
(1) Background: Parents of children with autism spectrum disorders often experience psychological distress, which can affect the quality of childcare they provide. It is crucial to screen for psychiatric symptoms among these parents. The core symptom index (CSI) is a widely recognized tool used to assess general symptoms, including depression, anxiety, and somatic issues. It has proven validity and reliability across diverse Thai populations. Given the cultural similarities between Thai and Chinese populations, the CSI has been successfully implemented within the Chinese population. Nevertheless, it is crucial to research its validity and reliability in the general Chinese population. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the CSI among parents of children with autism spectrum disorders using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). (2) Methods: A total of 794 Chinese parents raising children with autism participated in this study. All completed the CSI, along with the social inhibition subscale of the Interpersonal Problems Inventory and the Couple Satisfaction Index. Factorial validity was assessed using CFA to determine how well the bifactor three-factor model fits the data. Various structural models were compared using model fit indices. Convergent and discriminant validity were examined by exploring correlations with the social inhibition subscale and the Couple Satisfaction Index. Invariance testing of the CSI was conducted across multiple groups based on gender, age, and education using CFA. The reliability of the CSI was evaluated using McDonald's omega coefficients. (3) Results: The bifactor model emerged as the best-fitting model for the data, suggesting that the total score of the CSI adequately represents overall psychiatric symptoms. The CSI exhibited significant correlations with the social inhibition subscale ( = 0.41, < 0.01) and smaller correlation coefficients with the Couple Satisfaction Index ( = -0.16, < 0.05), indicating both convergent and discriminant validity. The invariant test results support scalar invariance levels based on gender and age but only partial invariance for education. The Chinese version of the CSI demonstrated high consistency, with McDonald's omega coefficients ranging between 0.86 and 0.95. (4) Conclusions: The bifactor model of the Chinese version of the CSI is validated, making it a suitable tool for measuring depression, anxiety, and somatization symptoms among parent(s) of children with autism spectrum disorders. Further research on other Chinese populations is encouraged.
(1) 背景:自闭症谱系障碍儿童的家长常常经历心理困扰,这会影响他们提供的育儿质量。筛查这些家长的精神症状至关重要。核心症状指数(CSI)是一种广泛认可的用于评估一般症状的工具,包括抑郁、焦虑和躯体问题。它在不同的泰国人群中已被证明具有有效性和可靠性。鉴于泰国人和中国人在文化上的相似性,CSI已在中国人群中成功应用。然而,研究其在一般中国人群中的有效性和可靠性至关重要。本研究旨在使用验证性因素分析(CFA)来探究自闭症谱系障碍儿童家长中中文版CSI的心理测量特性。(2) 方法:共有794名养育自闭症儿童的中国家长参与了本研究。所有人都完成了CSI,以及人际问题量表的社交抑制分量表和夫妻满意度指数。使用CFA评估因素效度,以确定双因素三因素模型与数据的拟合程度。使用模型拟合指数比较各种结构模型。通过探索与社交抑制分量表和夫妻满意度指数的相关性来检验聚合效度和区分效度。使用CFA对CSI在基于性别、年龄和教育程度的多个组中进行不变性检验。使用麦克唐纳ω系数评估CSI的可靠性。(3) 结果:双因素模型是数据的最佳拟合模型,表明CSI的总分充分代表了总体精神症状。CSI与社交抑制分量表显著相关(r = 0.41,p < 0.01),与夫妻满意度指数的相关系数较小(r = -0.16,p < 0.05),表明具有聚合效度和区分效度。不变性检验结果支持基于性别和年龄的标量不变性水平,但仅支持教育程度的部分不变性。中文版CSI表现出高度一致性,麦克唐纳ω系数在0.86至0.95之间。(4) 结论:中文版CSI的双因素模型得到验证,使其成为测量自闭症谱系障碍儿童家长抑郁、焦虑和躯体化症状的合适工具。鼓励对其他中国人群进行进一步研究。