• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种生态模型评估 spp. 抑制产毒和 的效果。

Three Ecological Models to Evaluate the Effectiveness of spp. for Suppressing Aflatoxigenic and .

机构信息

Department of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2024 Jul 12;16(7):314. doi: 10.3390/toxins16070314.

DOI:10.3390/toxins16070314
PMID:39057954
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11281256/
Abstract

Chemical pesticides help reduce crop loss during production and storage. However, the carbon footprints and ecological costs associated with this strategy are unsustainable. Here, we used three in vitro models to characterize how different species interact with two aflatoxin producers, and , to help develop a climate-resilient biological control strategy against aflatoxigenic species. The growth rate of species is a critical factor in suppressing aflatoxigenic strains via physical interactions. The dual plate assay suggests that mainly suppresses via antibiosis, whereas the suppression of occurs through mycoparasitism. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced by inhibited the growth of (34.6 ± 3.3%) and (20.9 ± 1.6%). The VOCs released by BTU and OSK-34 were most effective in suppressing growth. Metabolites secreted by OSK-38, BTU, OSK-13, and OSK-36 reduced the growth of both aflatoxigenic species. Overall, BTU was the most effective at suppressing the growth and aflatoxin B1 production of both species across all models. This work will guide efforts to screen for effective biological control agents to mitigate aflatoxin accumulation.

摘要

化学农药有助于减少生产和储存过程中的作物损失。然而,与这种策略相关的碳足迹和生态成本是不可持续的。在这里,我们使用三种体外模型来描述不同物种与两种黄曲霉毒素生产者 和 的相互作用方式,以帮助开发针对产黄曲霉毒素物种的抗气候生物控制策略。物种的生长速率是通过物理相互作用抑制产黄曲霉毒素菌株的关键因素。双平板测定表明, 主要通过抗生作用抑制 ,而 的抑制作用则通过真菌寄生作用发生。 产生的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)抑制了 的生长(34.6±3.3%)和 的生长(20.9±1.6%)。 BTU 和 OSK-34 释放的 VOCs 对抑制 生长最有效。 OSK-38、 BTU、 OSK-13 和 OSK-36 分泌的代谢物减少了两种产黄曲霉毒素物种的生长。总的来说, BTU 在所有模型中对抑制两种物种的生长和黄曲霉毒素 B1 产生的效果最为显著。这项工作将指导筛选有效生物防治剂以减轻黄曲霉毒素积累的努力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/c510952d6229/toxins-16-00314-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/b976bc3d60b3/toxins-16-00314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/d36b5dfba1b5/toxins-16-00314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/eff008e997ae/toxins-16-00314-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/cb52cc7eff95/toxins-16-00314-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/c510952d6229/toxins-16-00314-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/b976bc3d60b3/toxins-16-00314-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/d36b5dfba1b5/toxins-16-00314-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/eff008e997ae/toxins-16-00314-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/cb52cc7eff95/toxins-16-00314-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b6a/11281256/c510952d6229/toxins-16-00314-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Three Ecological Models to Evaluate the Effectiveness of spp. for Suppressing Aflatoxigenic and .三种生态模型评估 spp. 抑制产毒和 的效果。
Toxins (Basel). 2024 Jul 12;16(7):314. doi: 10.3390/toxins16070314.
2
The role of extrolites secreted by nonaflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus in biocontrol efficacy.非产黄曲霉的黄曲霉分泌的外生代谢产物在生物防治效果中的作用。
J Appl Microbiol. 2019 Apr;126(4):1257-1264. doi: 10.1111/jam.14175. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Potential of spp. for Biocontrol of Aflatoxin-Producing . spp. 在防治产黄曲霉毒素真菌中的生物防治潜力。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Jan 23;14(2):86. doi: 10.3390/toxins14020086.
4
Regulation of aflatoxin biosynthesis. 2 Comparative study of tricarboxylic acid cycle in aflatoxigenic and non-aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus.黄曲霉毒素生物合成的调控。2. 黄曲霉产毒菌株和非产毒菌株三羧酸循环的比较研究。
Microbios. 1977;19(75):7-15.
5
Effect of temperature and water activity on growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus on cured meat model systems.温度和水分活度对黄曲霉和寄生曲霉在腌制肉模型系统上生长及产黄曲霉毒素的影响。
Meat Sci. 2016 Dec;122:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
6
In vitro studies on the potential for biological control of Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium moniliforme by Trichoderma species. 1. Macroscopical and microscopical observations of fungal interactions.木霉属真菌对黄曲霉和串珠镰刀菌进行生物防治潜力的体外研究。1. 真菌相互作用的宏观和微观观察。
Mycopathologia. 1997;139(2):115-21. doi: 10.1023/a:1006867907885.
7
Biocontrol activity of volatile organic compounds from Streptomyces alboflavus TD-1 against Aspergillus flavus growth and aflatoxin production.链霉菌 TD-1 挥发物对黄曲霉生长和黄曲霉毒素产生的生物防治活性。
J Microbiol. 2019 May;57(5):396-404. doi: 10.1007/s12275-019-8517-9. Epub 2019 May 6.
8
Effects of temperature and medium composition on inhibitory activities of gossypol-related compounds against aflatoxigenic fungi.温度和培养基成分对棉酚相关化合物抑制产毒真菌活性的影响。
J Appl Microbiol. 2013 Jul;115(1):179-86. doi: 10.1111/jam.12219. Epub 2013 May 16.
9
Efficacy of fungal antagonists against aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, and fumonisins at different pathogen:antagonist inoculum ratios on grain corn agar and grain corn kernel.在谷物玉米琼脂和谷物玉米籽粒上,不同病原菌与拮抗菌接种比例下真菌拮抗菌对黄曲霉毒素、赭曲霉毒素A和伏马毒素的抑制效果。
J Appl Microbiol. 2025 Mar 3;136(3). doi: 10.1093/jambio/lxaf049.
10
Temperature and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus strains from Nigerian groundnuts.来自尼日利亚花生的黄曲霉和寄生曲霉菌株的温度与黄曲霉毒素产生情况
J Basic Microbiol. 1987;27(9):511-4. doi: 10.1002/jobm.3620270910.

本文引用的文献

1
Maize Aspergillus section Flavi isolate diversity may be distinct from that of soil and subsequently the source of aflatoxin contamination.玉米曲霉节黄曲霉菌株多样性可能与土壤中的不同,随后可能是黄曲霉毒素污染的来源。
Mycotoxin Res. 2024 Aug;40(3):351-367. doi: 10.1007/s12550-024-00532-7. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
2
Structure of Aspergillus flavus populations associated with maize in Greece, Spain, and Serbia: Implications for aflatoxin biocontrol on a regional scale.与希腊、西班牙和塞尔维亚玉米相关的黄曲霉种群结构:对区域范围内黄曲霉毒素生物防治的影响。
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2024 Apr;16(2):e13249. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.13249.
3
spp.-mediated mitigation of heat, drought, and their combination on the Arabidopsis thaliana holobiont: a metabolomics and metabarcoding approach.
物种介导的高温、干旱及其组合对拟南芥全生物的缓解作用:一种代谢组学和代谢条形码方法
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Aug 21;14:1190304. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1190304. eCollection 2023.
4
Antagonism of nonaflatoxigenic isolated from peanuts against aflatoxigenic growth and aflatoxin B production .从花生中分离出的非产黄曲霉毒素菌株对产黄曲霉毒素菌株生长及黄曲霉毒素B产生的拮抗作用
Food Sci Nutr. 2022 Aug 24;10(11):3993-4002. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2995. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Characterization and antagonistic potentials of selected rhizosphere species against some species.所选根际物种对某些物种的特性及拮抗潜力
Front Microbiol. 2022 Oct 3;13:985874. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.985874. eCollection 2022.
6
Potential of spp. for Biocontrol of Aflatoxin-Producing . spp. 在防治产黄曲霉毒素真菌中的生物防治潜力。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Jan 23;14(2):86. doi: 10.3390/toxins14020086.
7
Volatile Organic Compound Chamber: A Novel Technology for Microbiological Volatile Interaction Assays.挥发性有机化合物室:一种用于微生物挥发性相互作用测定的新技术。
J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;7(4):248. doi: 10.3390/jof7040248.
8
: The "Secrets" of a Multitalented Biocontrol Agent.一种多才多艺的生物防治剂的“秘密”
Plants (Basel). 2020 Jun 18;9(6):762. doi: 10.3390/plants9060762.
9
Comprehensive profiling of the VOCs of Trichoderma longibrachiatum EF5 while interacting with Sclerotium rolfsii and Macrophomina phaseolina.全面分析长枝木霉 EF5 与核盘菌和黑痣病菌互作时的 VOCs。
Microbiol Res. 2020 Jun;236:126436. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126436. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
10
The and Their Mycotoxins: Metabolic Interactions With Plants and the Soil Biota.[具体内容缺失,无法准确翻译完整]及其霉菌毒素:与植物和土壤生物群的代谢相互作用
Front Microbiol. 2020 Feb 12;10:2921. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02921. eCollection 2019.