• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三位不同放射科医师经腹部超声测量胆囊息肉大小的比较。

Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam 13574, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73 Geryeodae-ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Tomography. 2024 Jul 3;10(7):1031-1041. doi: 10.3390/tomography10070077.

DOI:10.3390/tomography10070077
PMID:39058049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11281002/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is little information regarding the size measurement differences in gallbladder (GB) polyps performed by different radiologists on abdominal ultrasonography (US).

AIM

To reveal the differences in GB polyp size measurements performed by different radiologists on abdominal US.

METHODS

From June to September 2022, the maximum diameter of 228 GB polyps was measured twice on abdominal US by one of three radiologists (a third-year radiology resident [reader A], a radiologist with 7 years of experience in abdominal US [reader B], and an abdominal radiologist with 8 years of experience in abdominal US [reader C]). Intra-reader agreements for polyp size measurements were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A Bland-Altman plot was used to visualize the differences between the first and second size measurements in each reader.

RESULTS

Reader A, reader B, and reader C evaluated 65, 77, and 86 polyps, respectively. The mean size of measured 228 GB polyps was 5.0 ± 1.9 mm. Except for the case where reader A showed moderate intra-reader agreement (0.726) for polyps with size ≤ 5 mm, all readers showed an overall high intra-reader reliability (reader A, ICC = 0.859; reader B, ICC = 0.947, reader C, ICC = 0.948), indicative of good and excellent intra-reader agreements. The 95% limit of agreement of reader A, B, and C was 1.9 mm of the mean in all three readers.

CONCLUSIONS

GB polyp size measurement on abdominal US showed good or excellent intra-reader agreements. However, size changes of approximately less than 1.9 mm should be interpreted carefully because these may be within the measurement error.

摘要

背景

关于不同放射科医生在腹部超声检查(US)中对胆囊(GB)息肉大小测量的差异,相关信息较少。

目的

揭示不同放射科医生在腹部 US 中对 GB 息肉大小测量的差异。

方法

2022 年 6 月至 9 月,由三位放射科医生(一位三年级放射科住院医师[读者 A]、一位具有 7 年腹部 US 经验的放射科医生[读者 B]和一位具有 8 年腹部 US 经验的腹部放射科医生[读者 C])对 228 个 GB 息肉的最大直径进行了两次腹部 US 测量。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估息肉大小测量的组内一致性。Bland-Altman 图用于可视化每个读者的第一次和第二次大小测量之间的差异。

结果

读者 A、读者 B 和读者 C 分别评估了 65、77 和 86 个息肉。228 个 GB 息肉的平均大小为 5.0±1.9mm。除了读者 A 对大小≤5mm 的息肉显示出中度组内一致性(0.726)外,所有读者均表现出总体高度的组内可靠性(读者 A,ICC=0.859;读者 B,ICC=0.947,读者 C,ICC=0.948),表明良好和优秀的组内一致性。三位读者的 95%一致性界限为所有三位读者的平均 1.9mm。

结论

腹部 US 上的 GB 息肉大小测量显示出良好或优秀的组内一致性。然而,大小变化约小于 1.9mm 应谨慎解释,因为这些可能在测量误差范围内。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/11281002/875661fcdb4e/tomography-10-00077-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/11281002/69a0a0ba5de9/tomography-10-00077-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/11281002/dd7b9e1e4a4d/tomography-10-00077-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/11281002/875661fcdb4e/tomography-10-00077-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/11281002/69a0a0ba5de9/tomography-10-00077-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/11281002/dd7b9e1e4a4d/tomography-10-00077-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c761/11281002/875661fcdb4e/tomography-10-00077-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Size Measurement of Gallbladder Polyps by Three Different Radiologists in Abdominal Ultrasonography.三位不同放射科医师经腹部超声测量胆囊息肉大小的比较。
Tomography. 2024 Jul 3;10(7):1031-1041. doi: 10.3390/tomography10070077.
2
Transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gallbladder polyps.经腹超声和内镜超声用于胆囊息肉的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012233.pub2.
3
Ultrasound for the Detection of Gallbladder Malignancy in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.超声用于检测原发性硬化性胆管炎中的胆囊恶性肿瘤
Liver Int. 2025 Sep;45(9):e70312. doi: 10.1111/liv.70312.
4
Predicting Neoplastic Gallbladder Polyps: The Role of Current Surgical Indications and Preoperative Images.预测胆囊肿瘤性息肉:当前手术指征及术前影像的作用
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 25;85(1):52-63. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2024.130.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Is Quantitative Radiographic Measurement of Acetabular Version Reliable in Anteverted and Retroverted Hips?髋臼前倾角和后倾角时髋臼版本的定量放射测量可靠吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2136-2144. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003159. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
8
Resected gallbladder polyps: comparison of the 2022 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound and Joint European Societies Guidelines' diagnostic performance.切除的胆囊息肉:2022年超声放射学会和欧洲联合学会指南诊断性能的比较
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11826-4.
9
Dietary fibre for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.膳食纤维用于预防复发性结直肠腺瘤和癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 8;1(1):CD003430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003430.pub2.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound of the Gallbladder-An Update on Measurements, Reference Values, Variants and Frequent Pathologies: A Scoping Review.胆囊超声检查——测量、参考值、变异及常见病理情况的最新进展:一项范围综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;15(6):941. doi: 10.3390/life15060941.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Recommendations.偶然发现的胆囊息肉的处理:超声放射学家学会共识会议推荐意见。
Radiology. 2022 Nov;305(2):277-289. doi: 10.1148/radiol.213079. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
2
The growth rates of solitary gallbladder polyps compared to multi-polyps: A quantitative analysis.孤立性胆囊息肉与多发性息肉的生长速率:一项定量分析。
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Sep 22;25(1):28-35. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12284. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: updated joint guidelines between the ESGAR, EAES, EFISDS and ESGE.
胆囊息肉的管理和随访:ESGAR、EAES、EFISDS 和 ESGE 联合更新指南
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):3358-3368. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08384-w. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
4
Longitudinal Ultrasound Assessment of Changes in Size and Number of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps.偶然检出胆囊息肉大小和数量的纵向超声评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Mar;218(3):472-483. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26614. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
Risk factors to discriminate neoplastic polypoid lesions of gallbladder: A large-scale case-series study.鉴别胆囊肿瘤性息肉样病变的危险因素:一项大规模病例系列研究。
Asian J Surg. 2021 Dec;44(12):1515-1519. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
6
Overtreatment of Nonneoplastic Gallbladder Polyps due to Inadequate Routine Ultrasound Assessment.因常规超声评估不足导致的非肿瘤性胆囊息肉过度治疗
Dig Surg. 2020 Dec 10:1-7. doi: 10.1159/000511896.
7
Outcomes of Gallbladder Polyps and Their Association With Gallbladder Cancer in a 20-Year Cohort.胆囊息肉的结局及其与 20 年队列中胆囊癌的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205143. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5143.
8
Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in sonographic size measurements of gallbladder polyps.胆囊息肉超声大小测量的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan;30(1):206-212. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06385-4. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
9
Quantitative contrast-enhanced US helps differentiating neoplastic vs non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps.定量对比增强超声有助于鉴别胆囊肿瘤性息肉与非肿瘤性息肉。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Jul;29(7):3772-3781. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06123-w. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
10
Computer-aided diagnosis system for thyroid nodules on ultrasonography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility based on the experience level of operators.基于操作人员经验水平的超声甲状腺结节计算机辅助诊断系统:诊断性能和可重复性。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1978-1985. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5772-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22.