• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证一种可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测 ICU 恶性肿瘤合并高钾血症患者的早期预后。

Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Early Prognosis Prediction in ICU Patients with Malignant Tumors and Hyperkalemia.

机构信息

Centre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 26;103(30):e38747. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038747.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000038747
PMID:39058887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11272258/
Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) predictive model for assessing mortality in patients with malignant tumors and hyperkalemia (MTH). We extracted data on patients with MTH from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV, version 2.2 (MIMIC-IV v2.2) database. The dataset was split into a training set (75%) and a validation set (25%). We used the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression to identify potential predictors, which included clinical laboratory indicators and vital signs. Pearson correlation analysis tested the correlation between predictors. In-hospital death was the prediction target. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) and accuracy of the training and validation sets of 7 ML algorithms were compared, and the optimal 1 was selected to develop the model. The calibration curve was used to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the model further. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) enhanced model interpretability. 496 patients with MTH in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were included. After screening, 17 clinical features were included in the construction of the ML model, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was <0.8, indicating that the correlation between the clinical features was small. eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) outperformed other algorithms, achieving perfect scores in the training set (accuracy: 1.000, AUC: 1.000) and high scores in the validation set (accuracy: 0.734, AUC: 0.733). The calibration curves indicated good predictive calibration of the model. SHAP analysis identified the top 8 predictive factors: urine output, mean heart rate, maximum urea nitrogen, minimum oxygen saturation, minimum mean blood pressure, maximum total bilirubin, mean respiratory rate, and minimum pH. In addition, SHAP and LIME performed in-depth individual case analyses. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of ML methods in predicting mortality risk in ICU patients with MTH. It highlights the importance of predictors like urine output and mean heart rate. SHAP and LIME significantly enhanced the model's interpretability.

摘要

本研究旨在开发和验证一种机器学习(ML)预测模型,以评估恶性肿瘤和高钾血症(MTH)患者的死亡率。我们从医疗信息监护 IV 版,版本 2.2(MIMIC-IV v2.2)数据库中提取了 MTH 患者的数据。数据集分为训练集(75%)和验证集(25%)。我们使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归来识别潜在的预测因素,包括临床实验室指标和生命体征。Pearson 相关分析测试了预测因素之间的相关性。住院期间死亡是预测目标。比较了 7 种 ML 算法在训练集和验证集的 AUC 和准确性,并选择最佳的 1 种来开发模型。校准曲线用于进一步评估模型的预测准确性。SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)和 Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations(LIME)增强了模型的可解释性。纳入了重症监护病房(ICU)中 496 例 MTH 患者。筛选后,17 项临床特征纳入 ML 模型构建,Pearson 相关系数<0.8,提示临床特征相关性较小。极端梯度提升(XGBoost)优于其他算法,在训练集上取得了完美的分数(准确率:1.000,AUC:1.000),在验证集上也取得了较高的分数(准确率:0.734,AUC:0.733)。校准曲线表明模型具有良好的预测校准能力。SHAP 分析确定了前 8 个预测因素:尿量、平均心率、最大尿素氮、最低氧饱和度、最低平均血压、最大总胆红素、平均呼吸频率和最低 pH。此外,SHAP 和 LIME 进行了深入的个体案例分析。本研究证明了 ML 方法在预测 ICU 恶性肿瘤和高钾血症患者死亡率方面的有效性。它强调了尿量和平均心率等预测因素的重要性。SHAP 和 LIME 极大地增强了模型的可解释性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/32dea0e8d8ff/medi-103-e38747-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/843dc432f1ac/medi-103-e38747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/dd4af172f604/medi-103-e38747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/260654b3146e/medi-103-e38747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/2d55fe682fd8/medi-103-e38747-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/dc4adefc181b/medi-103-e38747-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/8913a2e1db53/medi-103-e38747-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/32dea0e8d8ff/medi-103-e38747-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/843dc432f1ac/medi-103-e38747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/dd4af172f604/medi-103-e38747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/260654b3146e/medi-103-e38747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/2d55fe682fd8/medi-103-e38747-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/dc4adefc181b/medi-103-e38747-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/8913a2e1db53/medi-103-e38747-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1514/11272258/32dea0e8d8ff/medi-103-e38747-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Early Prognosis Prediction in ICU Patients with Malignant Tumors and Hyperkalemia.开发和验证一种可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测 ICU 恶性肿瘤合并高钾血症患者的早期预后。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 26;103(30):e38747. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038747.
2
Application of an interpretable machine learning method to predict the risk of death during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction combined with diabetes mellitus.应用可解释机器学习方法预测急性心肌梗死合并糖尿病患者住院期间的死亡风险。
Acta Cardiol. 2025 Apr 8:1-18. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2025.2481662.
3
Prognostic Assessment of COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit by Machine Learning Methods: Model Development and Validation.通过机器学习方法对重症监护病房中新冠肺炎的预后评估:模型开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 11;22(11):e23128. doi: 10.2196/23128.
4
Construction and validation of prognostic model for ICU mortality in cardiac arrest patients: an interpretable machine learning modeling approach.心脏骤停患者重症监护病房死亡率预后模型的构建与验证:一种可解释的机器学习建模方法
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 24;30(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02588-2.
5
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.
6
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
7
[Predicting Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Combined With Acute Kidney Injury Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study].[使用可解释机器学习模型预测心力衰竭合并急性肾损伤患者的重症监护病房死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Jan 20;56(1):183-190. doi: 10.12182/20250160507.
8
An explainable machine learning-based model to predict intensive care unit admission among patients with community-acquired pneumonia and connective tissue disease.基于可解释机器学习的模型,用于预测社区获得性肺炎和结缔组织病患者入住重症监护病房的情况。
Respir Res. 2024 Jun 18;25(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02874-3.
9
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality for ischemic stroke patients in ICU.用于预测ICU中缺血性中风患者院内死亡率的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Jun;198:105874. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105874. Epub 2025 Mar 9.
10
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-based predictive tools and nomogram for in-hospital mortality in critically ill cancer patients: development and external validation using retrospective cohorts.基于机器学习的危重症癌症患者院内死亡率预测工具及列线图:使用回顾性队列进行开发与外部验证
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03054-z.
2
Predictive value of heart rate for prognosis in patients with cerebral infarction without atrial fibrillation comorbidity analyzed according to the MIMIC-IV database.根据MIMIC-IV数据库分析无房颤合并症的脑梗死患者心率对预后的预测价值。
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 14;16:1551427. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1551427. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A deep learning-based interpretable decision tool for predicting high risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients prescribed highly emetogenic chemotherapy.基于深度学习的可解释决策工具,用于预测接受高致吐性化疗药物治疗的癌症患者发生化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的高危风险。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(17):18306-18316. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6428. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
2
A potential tumor marker: Chaperonin containing TCP‑1 controls the development of malignant tumors (Review).一种潜在的肿瘤标志物:热休克蛋白 10 家族成员 1 调控恶性肿瘤的发生发展(综述)。
Int J Oncol. 2023 Sep;63(3). doi: 10.3892/ijo.2023.5554. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
Prognostic Importance of Lactate and Blood Gas Parameters in Predicting Mortality in Patients with Critical Malignancies.
乳酸和血气参数对预测危重症恶性肿瘤患者死亡率的预后意义。
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023 Mar;33(2):255-262. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v33i2.10.
4
BUN level is associated with cancer prevalence.BUN 水平与癌症患病率相关。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jul 1;28(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01186-4.
5
Prediction of Acid-Base and Potassium Imbalances in Intensive Care Patients Using Machine Learning Techniques.运用机器学习技术预测重症监护患者的酸碱及钾失衡情况。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 18;13(6):1171. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061171.
6
Extracellular matrix remodeling in tumor progression and immune escape: from mechanisms to treatments.肿瘤进展和免疫逃逸中的细胞外基质重塑:从机制到治疗。
Mol Cancer. 2023 Mar 11;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12943-023-01744-8.
7
Clinical Prognostic Factors During the Last One Month of Life in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.终末期癌症患者生命最后一个月的临床预后因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Jan;33(1):10-14. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.01.10.
8
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
9
An Assessment of the Predictive Performance of Current Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models: Systematic Review.基于当前机器学习的乳腺癌风险预测模型的预测性能评估:系统评价。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Dec 29;8(12):e35750. doi: 10.2196/35750.
10
Utilization of model-agnostic explainable artificial intelligence frameworks in oncology: a narrative review.模型无关可解释人工智能框架在肿瘤学中的应用:一项叙述性综述
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Oct;11(10):3853-3868. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-1626.