• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性研究:在乳腺癌高危女性中补充应用增强型乳腺 X 线摄影筛查的效果:现况研究结果。

Prospective Study of Supplemental Screening With Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Women With Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer: Results of the Prevalence Round.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.

Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;42(32):3826-3836. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02819. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.22.02819
PMID:39058970
Abstract

PURPOSE

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have shown similar diagnostic performance in detection of breast cancer. Limited CEM data are available for high-risk breast cancer screening. The purpose of the study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy of supplemental screening CEM in elevated risk patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, single-institution, institutional review board-approved observational study was conducted in asymptomatic elevated risk women age 35 years or older who had a negative conventional two-dimensional digital breast tomosynthesis screening mammography (MG) and no additional supplemental screening within the prior 12 months.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty women were enrolled from February 2019 to April 2021. The median age was 56.8 (range, 35.0-79.2) years; 408 of 460 (88.7%) were mammographically dense. Biopsy revealed benign changes in 22 women (22/37, 59%), high-risk lesions in four women (4/37, 11%), and breast cancer in 11 women (11/37, 30%). Fourteen cancers (10 invasive, tumor size range 4-15 mm, median 9 mm) were diagnosed in 11 women. The overall supplemental cancer detection rate was 23.9 per 1,000 patients, 95% CI (12.0 to 42.4). All cancers were grade 1 or 2, ER+ ERBB2-, and node negative. CEM imaging screening offered high specificity (0.875 [95% CI, 0.844 to 0.906]), high NPV (0.998 [95% CI, 0.993 to 1.000), moderate PPV1 (0.164 [95% CI, 0.076 to 0.253), moderate PPV3 (0.275 [95% CI, 0.137 to 0.413]), and high sensitivity (0.917 [95% CI, 0.760 to 1.000]). At least 1 year of imaging follow-up was available on all patients, and one interval cancer was detected on breast MRI 4 months after negative screening CEM.

CONCLUSION

A pilot trial demonstrates a supplemental cancer detection rate of 23.9 per 1,000 in women at an elevated risk for breast cancer. Larger, multi-institutional, multiyear CEM trials in patients at elevated risk are needed for validation.

摘要

目的

对比增强乳腺摄影术(CEM)和磁共振成像(MRI)在乳腺癌检测中的诊断性能相似。目前针对高危乳腺癌筛查的 CEM 数据有限。本研究旨在前瞻性研究补充 CEM 在高危患者中的筛查效果。

材料与方法

这是一项在无症状高危女性中进行的前瞻性、单中心、机构审查委员会批准的观察性研究,这些女性年龄在 35 岁及以上,接受了阴性常规二维数字乳腺断层合成筛查乳房 X 线摄影术(MG),且在过去 12 个月内没有进行任何额外的补充筛查。

结果

2019 年 2 月至 2021 年 4 月共纳入 460 名女性。中位年龄为 56.8(范围:35.0-79.2)岁;460 名女性中有 408 名(88.7%)乳腺呈致密性。22 名女性(22/37,59%)活检显示良性改变,4 名女性(4/37,11%)存在高风险病变,11 名女性(11/37,30%)诊断为乳腺癌。11 名女性中有 14 名癌症(10 名浸润性癌,肿瘤大小范围 4-15mm,中位值 9mm)。1000 名患者中有 23.9 例(95%CI,12.0-42.4)补充发现癌症,总体癌症检出率为 23.9/1000 例。所有癌症均为 1 级或 2 级,ER+、ERBB2-、且无淋巴结转移。CEM 成像筛查具有高特异性(0.875[95%CI,0.844 至 0.906])、高阴性预测值(0.998[95%CI,0.993 至 1.000])、中等阳性预测值 1(0.164[95%CI,0.076 至 0.253])、中等阳性预测值 3(0.275[95%CI,0.137 至 0.413])和高灵敏度(0.917[95%CI,0.760 至 1.000])。所有患者均至少有 1 年的影像学随访,在阴性 CEM 筛查后 4 个月,乳腺 MRI 检测到 1 例间期癌。

结论

该试验初步表明,高危乳腺癌女性中 CEM 补充检出率为 23.9/1000。需要在高危患者中进行更大规模、多机构、多年的 CEM 试验以验证该结果。

相似文献

1
Prospective Study of Supplemental Screening With Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in Women With Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer: Results of the Prevalence Round.前瞻性研究:在乳腺癌高危女性中补充应用增强型乳腺 X 线摄影筛查的效果:现况研究结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Nov 10;42(32):3826-3836. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02819. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
2
Screening for Breast Cancer with Contrast-enhanced Mammography as an Alternative to MRI: SCEMAM Trial Results.对比增强乳腺钼靶筛查作为MRI替代方法用于乳腺癌筛查:SCEMAM试验结果
Radiology. 2025 Jun;315(3):e242634. doi: 10.1148/radiol.242634.
3
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.乳腺 X 线摄影联合乳腺超声与乳腺 X 线摄影用于一般风险女性乳腺癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD009632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009632.pub3.
4
Comparison of supplemental breast cancer imaging techniques-interim results from the BRAID randomised controlled trial.补充性乳腺癌成像技术的比较——BRAID随机对照试验的中期结果
Lancet. 2025 May 31;405(10493):1935-1944. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00582-3. Epub 2025 May 21.
5
Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.早期乳腺癌检测:乳腺钼靶致密型腺体女性无症状人群中补充乳腺超声检查的获益与风险:系统评价。
BMC Cancer. 2009 Sep 20;9:335. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-335.
6
Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography Screening in Women with a Family History of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌家族史女性的断层合成成像与数字乳腺摄影筛查对比
JAMA Oncol. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.1209.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer: systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation.不同原发性乳腺癌治疗后监测性乳房 X 光造影方案的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价注册库分析和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(34):v-vi, 1-322. doi: 10.3310/hta15340.
8
Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline.乳腺癌筛查:为为加拿大预防性医疗保健指南提供信息而进行的系统评价更新
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;13(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02700-3.
9
Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.乳腺致密女性的乳腺癌补充筛查:美国预防服务工作组的系统评价
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):268-78. doi: 10.7326/M15-1789. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
A head-to-head comparison of breast lesion's conspicuity at contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI.对比增强乳腺钼靶摄影和对比增强磁共振成像对乳腺病变的显示能力的直接比较。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun;35(6):3070-3079. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11195-4. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of mammographic breast density on locoregional recurrence in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺钼靶密度对乳腺癌局部区域复发的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s10549-025-07804-5.
2
Deep learning-based risk stratification of ductal carcinoma using mammography and abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging.基于深度学习的乳腺导管癌风险分层:使用乳房X线摄影和简化乳腺磁共振成像
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 24;15:1587882. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1587882. eCollection 2025.
3
Global burden of breast cancer and application of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: a systematic analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2021 and WHO international clinical trial register database.
乳腺癌的全球负担及患者报告结局在临床试验中的应用:基于2021年全球疾病负担研究和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册数据库的系统分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 12;15:1557080. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1557080. eCollection 2025.
4
Quantitative Changes in Breast Density and Mammographic Features Induced by Pregnancy and Lactation: A Longitudinal Study.妊娠和哺乳期引起的乳腺密度和乳腺X线摄影特征的定量变化:一项纵向研究。
J Breast Imaging. 2025 Sep 2;7(4):429-436. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf015.