Ślusarczyk Aleksander, Wolański Rafał, Miłow Jerzy, Piekarczyk Hanna, Lipiński Piotr, Zapała Piotr, Niemczyk Grzegorz, Kurzyna Paweł, Wróbel Andrzej, Różański Waldemar, Radziszewski Piotr, Zapała Łukasz
Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
2nd Clinic of Urology, Medical University of Lodz, 93-513 Łódź, Poland.
Biomedicines. 2024 Jul 11;12(7):1541. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071541.
Radical cystectomy (RC) remains a mainstay surgical treatment for non-metastatic muscle-invasive and BCG-unresponsive bladder cancer. Various perioperative scoring tools assess comorbidity burden, complication risks, and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) risk. We investigated the prognostic value of these scores in patients who underwent RC between 2015 and 2021. Cox proportional hazards were used in survival analyses. Risk models' accuracy was assessed with the concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve. Among 215 included RC patients, 63 (29.3%) died, including 53 (24.7%) cancer-specific deaths, with a median follow-up of 39 months. The AJCC system, COBRA score, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) predicted CSM with low accuracy (C-index: 0.66, 0.65; 0.59, respectively). Multivariable Cox regression identified the AJCC system and CCI > 5 as significant CSM predictors. Additional factors included the extent of lymph node dissection, histology, smoking, presence of concomitant CIS, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and model accuracy was high (C-index: 0.80). The internal validation of the model with bootstrap samples revealed its slight optimism of 0.06. In conclusion, the accuracy of the AJCC staging system in the prediction of CSM is low and can be improved with the inclusion of other pathological data, CCI, smoking history and inflammatory indices.
根治性膀胱切除术(RC)仍然是治疗非转移性肌层浸润性和卡介苗无反应性膀胱癌的主要手术方式。各种围手术期评分工具可评估合并症负担、并发症风险和癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)风险。我们研究了这些评分在2015年至2021年间接受RC手术患者中的预后价值。生存分析采用Cox比例风险模型。通过一致性指数(C指数)和曲线下面积评估风险模型的准确性。在纳入的215例RC患者中,63例(29.3%)死亡,其中53例(24.7%)为癌症特异性死亡,中位随访时间为39个月。美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)系统、COBRA评分和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)对CSM的预测准确性较低(C指数分别为0.66、0.65和0.59)。多变量Cox回归分析确定AJCC系统和CCI>5是CSM的重要预测因素。其他因素包括淋巴结清扫范围、组织学类型、吸烟情况、伴发原位癌的存在以及中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值,模型准确性较高(C指数:0.80)。通过自抽样对模型进行内部验证,结果显示其存在0.06的轻微乐观偏差。总之,AJCC分期系统在预测CSM方面的准确性较低,纳入其他病理数据、CCI、吸烟史和炎症指标后可提高其准确性。