Zhong Bowei, Niu Nana, Li Jin, Wu Yun, Fan Wei
CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 11;14(7):591. doi: 10.3390/bs14070591.
Understanding the psychological drivers of pro-environmental behavior across different socioeconomic statuses (SESs) is crucial for effectively addressing environmental challenges. To assist businesses and management departments in adequately identifying the psychological characteristics of target consumer groups from different SES backgrounds, our research manipulated subjective SES through three experimental studies to investigate the influence of subjective SES on pro-environmental behavior. Studies 1 and 2 adopted online experiments to examine the influence of subjective SES on pro-environmental behavior within the private sphere and the public sphere. Subsequently, Study 3 further investigated the psychological mechanisms through which subjective SES influences pro-environmental behavior. These results indicated that individuals from high SES backgrounds exhibit a greater propensity for green consumption behavior and contribute more financially to environmental organizations than those from low SES backgrounds. In addition, these studies further elucidated that the sense of control and life history strategy sequentially mediate the relationship. These findings provide empirical evidence for understanding whether and how subjective SES influences pro-environmental behavior, and enriching the theoretical framework of the relationship between subjective SES on pro-environmental behavior.
了解不同社会经济地位(SES)人群亲环境行为的心理驱动因素对于有效应对环境挑战至关重要。为帮助企业和管理部门充分识别来自不同SES背景的目标消费群体的心理特征,我们的研究通过三项实验研究操纵主观社会经济地位,以调查主观社会经济地位对亲环境行为的影响。研究1和研究2采用在线实验,考察主观社会经济地位对私人领域和公共领域亲环境行为的影响。随后,研究3进一步探究主观社会经济地位影响亲环境行为的心理机制。这些结果表明,与低社会经济地位背景的人相比,高社会经济地位背景的人表现出更强的绿色消费行为倾向,并且在经济上对环保组织的贡献更大。此外,这些研究进一步阐明,控制感和生活史策略依次介导了这种关系。这些发现为理解主观社会经济地位是否以及如何影响亲环境行为提供了实证证据,并丰富了主观社会经济地位与亲环境行为之间关系的理论框架。