Navarro-Carrillo Ginés, Alonso-Ferres María, Moya Miguel, Valor-Segura Inmaculada
Department of Psychology, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 10;11:1303. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01303. eCollection 2020.
Socioeconomic status (SES) is a complex and multidimensional construct, encompassing both independent objective characteristics (e.g., income or education) and subjective people's ratings of their placement in the socioeconomic spectrum. Within the growing literature on subjective SES belongingness and psychological well-being, subjective indices of SES have tended to center on the use of pictorial rank-related social ladders where individuals place themselves relative to others by simultaneously considering their income, educational level, and occupation. This approach, albeit consistent with the idea of these social ladders as summative or cognitive SES markers, might potentially constrain individuals' conceptions of their SES. This research ( = 368; = 39.67, = 13.40) is intended to expand prior investigations on SES and psychological well-being by revisiting the role of subjective SES. In particular, it (a) proposes an innovative adaptation of the traditional MacArthur Scale of subjective SES to income, education, and occupation, thus resulting in three separate social ladders; and (b) tests the empirical contribution of such three social ladders to psychological well-being. Overall, our findings showed that the novel education and occupation ladders (excluding the income ladder) are predictive of a significant part of the variance levels of psychological well-being that is not due to canonical objective metrics of SES (i.e., income, education, and occupation), or to the conventional MacArthur Scale of subjective SES. Although preliminary, these results underscore the need to further reconsider (subjective) SES-related conceptualization and measurement strategies to gather a more comprehensive understanding of the SES-psychological well-being link.
社会经济地位(SES)是一个复杂的多维度概念,既包含独立的客观特征(如收入或教育程度),也包含人们对自己在社会经济谱系中位置的主观评价。在关于主观社会经济地位归属感与心理健康的文献不断增加的背景下,社会经济地位的主观指标往往集中在使用与社会阶层相关的图片式阶梯上,个体通过同时考虑自己的收入、教育水平和职业来确定自己相对于他人的位置。这种方法虽然与这些社会阶梯作为总结性或认知性社会经济地位标志的观点一致,但可能会限制个体对其社会经济地位的认知。本研究(N = 368;M = 39.67,SD = 13.40)旨在通过重新审视主观社会经济地位的作用,扩展先前对社会经济地位与心理健康的研究。具体而言,研究(a)提出了对传统麦克阿瑟主观社会经济地位量表在收入、教育和职业方面的创新性改编,从而产生三个独立的社会阶梯;(b)检验这三个社会阶梯对心理健康的实证贡献。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,新颖的教育和职业阶梯(不包括收入阶梯)能够预测心理健康差异水平的很大一部分,这部分差异并非由社会经济地位的典型客观指标(即收入、教育和职业)或传统的麦克阿瑟主观社会经济地位量表所导致。尽管这些结果是初步的,但它们强调了进一步重新考虑(主观)社会经济地位相关概念化和测量策略的必要性,以便更全面地理解社会经济地位与心理健康之间的联系。