• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我们可以做得更好”:开发与LGBTQ2S+问题相关的态度量表——量表开发初学者最佳实践建议入门指南

"We Can Do Better": Developing Attitudinal Scales Relevant to LGBTQ2S+ Issues-A Primer on Best Practice Recommendations for Beginners in Scale Development.

作者信息

Bishop C J, Morrison Todd Graham

机构信息

Psychology Program, Grenfell Campus, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, Corner Brook, NL A2H 5G4, Canada.

Department of Psychology and Health Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A5, Canada.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 18;14(7):611. doi: 10.3390/bs14070611.

DOI:10.3390/bs14070611
PMID:39062434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11273634/
Abstract

In this primer, following best practice recommendations and drawing upon their own expertise in psychometrics, the authors provide a step-by-step guide for developing measures relevant to sexual- and gender-marginalized persons (SGMPs). To ensure that readers operate from a uniform understanding, definitions for central elements of psychometric testing (e.g., reliability and validity) are provided. Then, detailed information is given about developing and refining scale items. Strategies designed to reduce a pool of items to a manageable number are also highlighted. The authors conclude this primer by discussing various forms of validation (e.g., convergent, discriminant, and known groups). To further readers' understanding, illustrative examples from measures designed for SGMPs are brought into focus throughout.

摘要

在本入门指南中,作者遵循最佳实践建议并凭借自身在心理测量学方面的专业知识,提供了一份针对开发与性取向和性别边缘化人群(SGMPs)相关测量工具的分步指南。为确保读者有统一的理解,文中给出了心理测量测试核心要素(如信度和效度)的定义。接着,详细介绍了量表项目的开发和完善。还重点强调了将大量项目缩减至可管理数量的策略。作者通过讨论各种形式的效度验证(如收敛效度、区分效度和已知群体效度)来结束本入门指南。为进一步增进读者的理解,文中自始至终都聚焦于为性取向和性别边缘化人群设计的测量工具中的示例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6455/11273634/457be217a816/behavsci-14-00611-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6455/11273634/457be217a816/behavsci-14-00611-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6455/11273634/457be217a816/behavsci-14-00611-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
"We Can Do Better": Developing Attitudinal Scales Relevant to LGBTQ2S+ Issues-A Primer on Best Practice Recommendations for Beginners in Scale Development.“我们可以做得更好”:开发与LGBTQ2S+问题相关的态度量表——量表开发初学者最佳实践建议入门指南
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 18;14(7):611. doi: 10.3390/bs14070611.
2
Evaluating Web-Based Care for Mental Health and Substance Use Issues for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Questioning, and 2-Spirit Youths in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Community-Based Participatory Research Study.评估基于网络的针对 LGBTQ2S+ 青年心理健康和物质使用问题的关怀在 COVID-19 大流行背景下的服务:社区参与式研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 17;25:e44292. doi: 10.2196/44292.
3
Poverty in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Two-Spirit, and Other Sexual and Gender Minority (LGBTQ2S+) Communities in Canada: Implications for Social Work Practice.加拿大女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿、双灵人及其他性少数和性别少数群体(LGBTQ2S+)社区中的贫困问题:对社会工作实践的影响
Res Soc Work Pract. 2021 Sep;31(6):584-598. doi: 10.1177/1049731521996814. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Development of a lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender cultural competence scale for nurses in South Korea: a methodological study.韩国护士的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别文化能力量表的制定:一种方法学研究。
Womens Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;30(2):107-116. doi: 10.4069/whn.2024.06.19. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
5
A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Composite LGBT Prejudice and Discrimination Scales.对LGBT复合偏见与歧视量表心理测量特性的系统评价
J Homosex. 2019;66(4):549-570. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1422935. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
A lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender dedicated inpatient psychiatric unit in rural New England: a descriptive analysis in demographics, service utilisation and needs.新英格兰乡村地区一家专门收治女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者的住院精神科病房:人口统计学、服务利用情况及需求的描述性分析
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Dec;25(23-24):3570-3576. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13253. Epub 2016 May 30.
7
Does your organization use gender inclusive forms? Nurses' confusion about trans* terminology.你们机构是否使用包含性别的表格?护士对跨性别术语的困惑。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov;24(21-22):3306-17. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12942. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
8
Sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression-based violence in Catalan universities: qualitative findings from university students and staff.加泰罗尼亚大学中基于性取向、性别认同和性别表达的暴力行为:来自大学生和教职员工的定性研究结果
Arch Public Health. 2021 Feb 4;79(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00532-4.
9
Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Development of Clinical Skills Scale.《女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别临床技能发展量表》的日本版的编制与验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 27;19(3):e0298574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298574. eCollection 2024.
10
"I Went into This as One Person, and Then Came Out a Totally Different Person": Native LGBTQ2S+ Young Adults' Conceptions of Trauma.“我进去时是一个人,出来时却完全变成了另一个人”:本土 LGBTQ2S+ 青年对创伤的认知
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):NP3293-NP3319. doi: 10.1177/0886260520948523. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the nonbinary gender microaggressions (NBGM) scale.非二元性别微侵犯(NBGM)量表的编制。
Int J Transgend Health. 2022 Feb 23;24(4):417-435. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2039339. eCollection 2023.
2
Homonegativity Scores in Response to Static Same-Sex Imagery versus Observable Behavioral Change in Response to an Interactive Gay Male Target.针对静态同性意象的同性恋消极性得分与针对互动式男同性恋目标的可观察行为变化的对比。
J Homosex. 2021 Nov 10;68(13):2301-2321. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2020.1736431. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.
健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
4
A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Composite LGBT Prejudice and Discrimination Scales.对LGBT复合偏见与歧视量表心理测量特性的系统评价
J Homosex. 2019;66(4):549-570. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1422935. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
Using Confidence Intervals for Assessing Reliability of Real Tests.使用置信区间评估真实测试的可靠性。
Assessment. 2019 Oct;26(7):1207-1216. doi: 10.1177/1073191117737375. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
6
A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources.性取向研究中探索性因素分析的方法学综述:应用实践、最佳实践及数据分析资源
J Sex Res. 2017 Jan;54(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2015.1137538. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Gay Male Sexual Difficulties Scale.男同性恋者性困难量表的编制与心理测量学评估
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Aug;45(6):1299-315. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0664-4. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
A Psychometric Review of Measures Assessing Discrimination Against Sexual Minorities.对评估性少数群体歧视的测量方法的心理测量学综述
J Homosex. 2016 Aug;63(8):1086-126. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1117903. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
9
Internalized Homonegativity: A Systematic Mapping Review of Empirical Research.内化的同性恋憎恶:实证研究的系统映射综述
J Homosex. 2016;63(4):541-58. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1083788. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
10
From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation.从始至终:一种实用的方法,解决普遍存在的内部一致性估计问题。
Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):399-412. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12046. Epub 2013 Aug 6.