Bishop C J
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Homosex. 2021 Nov 10;68(13):2301-2321. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2020.1736431. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
Homonegativity research tends to focus on the identities of gay men and lesbian women through inauthentic means such as vignettes and signifiers like t-shirts with pro-gay slogans. Such research also tends to neglect sexual behavior. These issues were addressed in the present mixed-methods study. Heterosexual male ( = 196) and female ( = 219) participants were asked to complete measures of old-fashioned and modern homonegativity toward gay men and lesbian women after viewing a set of stimuli depicting gay male, lesbian female, or heterosexual couples. Participants also completed an interview with the researcher where he self-identified as a gay male and observed any changes in behavior following his disclosure. Findings indicated that male participants showed higher levels of modern homonegativity than female participants, regardless of the images viewed, and had higher odds of exhibiting negative behavioral change in response to the researcher's self-disclosure. Also, participants who viewed images of lesbian couples kissing or embracing had lower odds of showing negative behavioral change.
同性恋厌恶研究往往通过一些不真实的方式，比如使用小插曲以及带有支持同性恋口号的T恤等标志符，来关注男同性恋者和女同性恋者的身份。这类研究还往往忽视性行为。本混合方法研究探讨了这些问题。 heterosexual male ( = 196) 和 female ( = 219) 参与者在观看一组描绘男同性恋、女同性恋或异性恋情侣的刺激材料后，被要求完成对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的传统和现代同性恋厌恶程度的测量。参与者还与研究者进行了一次访谈，研究者表明自己是男同性恋者，并观察了在他披露身份后参与者行为的任何变化。研究结果表明，无论观看的是何种图像，男性参与者表现出的现代同性恋厌恶程度都高于女性参与者，并且在研究者披露身份后，他们表现出负面行为变化的几率更高。此外，观看女同性恋情侣亲吻或拥抱图像的参与者表现出负面行为变化的几率较低。 （原文中“heterosexual male ( = 196) and female ( = 219)”这里的表述似乎有误，推测可能是想表达“196名男性异性恋者和219名女性异性恋者”之类的意思，但按照原文准确翻译就是这样。）
