Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus, Damascus P.O. Box 30621, Syria.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Jordan, P.O. Box 2212, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 15;60(7):1139. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071139.
: To compare the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) outcomes between patients treated with modified Ni-Ti spring-based alignment appliances or conventional fixed appliances using the Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP-14), as well as the levels of satisfaction with the appliance appearance, treatment progress, and outcomes. : Thirty-six patients (11 males, 25 females) were randomly divided into two groups: either the modified aligner appliance with Ni-Ti springs group (MAA) or the traditional fixed appliances group (FA). The allocation ratio was 1:1, and the randomization process was carried out by an independent investigator not involved in this study. Mild crowding cases were included in this study. The OHRQoL of patients was evaluated using the short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) at five time points: before the treatment commencement (T0); 2 weeks (T1), 1 month (T2), and 2 months (T3) after the treatment initiation; and post-treatment (T4). The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the patient satisfaction. Blinding was performed only during the outcomes assessment. : This randomized controlled trial had no dropouts, and the demographic characteristics of the groups were comparable. The MAA group experienced significantly greater functional limitations compared with the FA group at all three evaluation time points (T1, T2, and T3), as evidenced by the statistically significant -values ( = 0.004, = 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). The psychological disability in the MAA group was significantly lower than in the FA group at both T2 ( = 0.005) and T3 ( = 0.003). The patient satisfaction with the appliance appearance was significantly higher in the MAA group than in the FA group ( = 0.002). : The OHRQoL improved in both the modified aligner appliance with Ni-Ti springs and fixed appliance groups after the treatment. Moreover, the functional limitations during the treatment were less severe in the FA group, while the psychological disability was lower, and the patient satisfaction with the appliance appearance was higher in the MAA group.
比较使用改良镍钛弹簧基直丝弓矫治器和传统固定矫治器治疗的患者的口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)结果,使用口腔健康影响程度量表 14(OHIP-14),以及对矫治器外观、治疗进展和结果的满意度。36 名患者(11 名男性,25 名女性)随机分为两组:改良直丝弓矫治器加镍钛弹簧组(MAA)或传统固定矫治器组(FA)。分配比例为 1:1,随机过程由一名不参与本研究的独立研究者进行。本研究纳入轻度拥挤病例。患者的 OHRQoL 使用简化口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP-14)在五个时间点进行评估:治疗开始前(T0);治疗开始后 2 周(T1)、1 个月(T2)和 2 个月(T3);以及治疗后(T4)。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估患者满意度。仅在结果评估时进行盲法。这项随机对照试验没有脱落病例,两组的人口统计学特征相似。在所有三个评估时间点(T1、T2 和 T3),MAA 组的功能障碍明显大于 FA 组,差异有统计学意义(=0.004、=0.001 和 <0.001)。在 T2(=0.005)和 T3(=0.003)时,MAA 组的心理障碍明显低于 FA 组。MAA 组患者对矫治器外观的满意度明显高于 FA 组(=0.002)。改良镍钛弹簧直丝弓矫治器和固定矫治器组治疗后 OHRQoL 均有改善。此外,FA 组治疗期间的功能障碍较轻,而 MAA 组的心理障碍较低,患者对矫治器外观的满意度较高。