使用矫治器和固定矫治器进行正畸治疗对口腔健康相关生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Impact of orthodontic treatment with aligners and fixed appliances on OHRQoL: a randomized clinical trial.
作者信息
Borsato Thais Teixeira, Bittencourt Jéssica Madeira, Paiva Saul Martins, Conti Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira, Fernandes Thais Maria Freire, Almeida-Pedrin Renata Rodrigues de, Almeida Marcio Rodrigues de, Oltramari Paula Vanessa Pedron
机构信息
Universidade Uniderp, Department of Orthodontics, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, School of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
出版信息
Braz Oral Res. 2025 Feb 7;39:e12. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.012. eCollection 2025.
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of orthodontic treatment with orthodontic aligners (OAs) and fixed appliances (FAs) on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This parallel randomized clinical trial included 40 male and female patients aged 13 to 35 years diagnosed with Angle's Class I malocclusion. Participants were assigned to two groups: OA (n = 20) and FA (n = 20). OHRQoL was assessed using the Brazilian OHIP-14, which was administered before treatment (T0), at 1 month (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after treatment initiation. Data were analyzed using the independent t test, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney test, and Friedman test (p < 0.05). FAs had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher impact on OHRQoL at T1 in terms of functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, and overall score. Within-group comparison showed higher scores for the FA group in comparison to the OA group. Functional limitation scores were higher at T1 than at T0 (p = 0.034), while physical pain scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.034) and T2 (p = 0.010). Psychological discomfort scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.015). Physical disability scores were higher at T1 compared to T0 (p = 0.008). Overall scores were higher at T1 than at T2 (p = 0.003). No significant changes were observed in the OA within-group comparison. Patients treated with OAs had less impact on OHRQoL compared to those treated with FAs in the first month. There was no difference between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.
本研究的目的是评估使用正畸矫治器(OA)和固定矫治器(FA)进行正畸治疗对口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响。这项平行随机临床试验纳入了40名年龄在13至35岁之间、被诊断为安氏I类错牙合的男性和女性患者。参与者被分为两组:OA组(n = 20)和FA组(n = 20)。使用巴西OHIP-14评估OHRQoL,该量表在治疗前(T0)、治疗开始后1个月(T1)、6个月(T2)和12个月(T3)进行施测。数据采用独立t检验、卡方检验、曼-惠特尼检验和弗里德曼检验进行分析(p < 0.05)。在T1时,就功能受限、身体疼痛、心理不适、身体残疾、心理残疾和总分而言,FA对OHRQoL的影响显著更高(p < 0.05)。组内比较显示,FA组的得分高于OA组。功能受限得分在T1时高于T0(p = 0.034),而身体疼痛得分在T1时高于T0(p = 0.034)和T2(p = 0.010)。心理不适得分在T1时高于T2(p = 0.015)。身体残疾得分在T1时高于T0(p = 0.008)。总分在T1时高于T2(p = 0.003)。OA组内比较未观察到显著变化。与使用FA治疗的患者相比,使用OA治疗的患者在第一个月对OHRQoL的影响较小。在6个月的随访中,两组之间没有差异。