Service de Traumatologie, Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU de Lille, Hôpital Roger Salengro, F-59000 Lille, France.
Service de Traumatologie, Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU de Lille, Hôpital Roger Salengro, F-59000 Lille, France.
Injury. 2024 Jun;55 Suppl 1:111352. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111352. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
Lisfranc joint injuries are common and often underdiagnosed. They occur during trauma of various mechanisms, high or low energy. Their management is difficult because of the wide spectrum of lesions and the management of associated lesions, particularly in the emergency stage. Their surgical treatment remains controversial. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the management of Lisfranc injuries and to study their clinical, functional and radiologic evolution. We also wanted to assess the consequences of these lesions on the patient's quality of life.
This was a retrospective multicenter study of 141 patients over 16 years at the time of the trauma. The patients included had presented a Lisfranc injury from January 2010 to June 2018. The epidemiological characteristics, the type of osteosynthesis, and the immediate and radiographic results at the last follow-up were collected. Functional assessment was analyzed by telephone review using the SF12, FAAM and AOFAS scores.
An associated M2 base fracture was found in almost 50 % of cases. A closed reduction and fixation was made in 25 % of cases. There was 69 % pins fixation. The reduction was not anatomical in 1/3 of the cases and was more difficult to achieve with an associated fracture. The FAAM score was statistically superior in the patients with internal fixation by screws compared to the treatment by pins. We found 18 % early complications. At least 1 year after the injury, C2M2 osteoarthritis was found in 45 % of patients.
Contrary to what is recommended in the literature, this study reported a high rate of osteosynthesis by pins whereas screws and plates were more recommended. Open reduction was also recommended and was the strategy of choice in this study. An M2 fracture was often associated with Lisfranc dislocations. The quality of reduction was essential and was better with open reduction and screw fixation.
跖跗关节损伤较为常见且常被漏诊。它们可由高能量或低能量的各种机制外伤引起。由于损伤范围广泛,且需要处理相关损伤,尤其是在急诊阶段,其治疗较为困难。手术治疗仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在评估和比较跖跗关节损伤的治疗方法,并研究其临床、功能和影像学转归。我们还希望评估这些损伤对患者生活质量的影响。
这是一项回顾性多中心研究,纳入了 141 例 16 岁以上的患者,其在创伤时出现了跖跗关节损伤。收集了流行病学特征、骨固定类型、末次随访时的即刻和影像学结果。通过电话访谈使用 SF-12、FAAM 和 AOFAS 评分进行功能评估。
近 50%的病例发现存在 M2 基底部骨折。25%的病例行闭合复位固定,69%的病例行钢针固定。1/3的病例复位不理想,且合并骨折时复位更困难。与钢针治疗相比,螺钉内固定的 FAAM 评分明显更高。我们发现有 18%的早期并发症。至少在损伤后 1 年,45%的患者出现 C2M2 骨关节炎。
与文献推荐相反,本研究报告的钢针内固定率较高,而螺钉和钢板更受推荐。我们也推荐切开复位,且该方法是本研究的首选策略。M2 骨折常合并跖跗关节脱位。复位质量至关重要,切开复位和螺钉固定可获得更好的复位质量。