J Hist Ideas. 2024;85(3):601-626. doi: 10.1353/jhi.2024.a933860.
This article offers a new interpretation of anti-colonial constitutional thought of the mid-twentieth century. Historians and political theorists have long viewed the circulation of democratic constitutions at the moment of decolonization in terms of the diffusion of electoral, parliamentary government. This article argues against such a "parliamentary" reading of anti-colonial democracy by examining the political thought of Indian Marxist thinker M. N. Roy (1887-1954). I reconstruct Roy's writings on anti-parliamentary forms of popular sovereignty through the 1940s. Further, I situate Roy's democratic theory as a response to understandings of political representation within the Indian national movement.
本文对 20 世纪中叶的反殖民宪法思想进行了新的解读。历史学家和政治理论家长期以来一直认为,在去殖民化时期,民主宪法的传播是通过选举、议会政府的扩散来实现的。本文通过考察印度马克思主义思想家 M.N.罗伊(M. N. Roy,1887-1954 年)的政治思想,反对这种对反殖民民主的“议会”解读。我通过 20 世纪 40 年代的著作重建了罗伊关于反议会形式的人民主权的观点。此外,我将罗伊的民主理论置于印度民族运动中对政治代表的理解的背景下。