Davies David Liam, Lawal AbdulAzeez, Orji Angela E, Tytherleigh Chloe, Walsh Kieran
BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR UK.
Future Healthc J. 2024 Jun 25;11(3):100156. doi: 10.1016/j.fhj.2024.100156. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Debates about digital learning, face-to-face learning and blended learning often focus on their effectiveness in achieving a few core educational outcomes. The cost or convenience of using different methods to achieve certain outcomes have increasingly come into the educational framework over the past two decades. However, only rarely do educators or learners consider the climate footprint of their various activities. This is an important shortcoming, as all learning activities can contribute to our overall climate footprint. Providers of education should do their best to minimise the carbon footprint associated with their learning. But learners also have responsibility to ensure that how they access learning is also associated with minimal environmental cost. Both providers and learners should focus on activities that are likely to have the greatest impact. This is relevant both to face-to-face education and digital learning.
关于数字化学习、面对面学习和混合式学习的争论往往聚焦于它们在实现一些核心教育成果方面的有效性。在过去二十年里,使用不同方法实现特定成果的成本或便利性越来越多地进入教育框架。然而,教育工作者或学习者很少考虑他们各种活动的气候足迹。这是一个重要的缺点,因为所有学习活动都会对我们的整体气候足迹产生影响。教育提供者应尽力将与他们的学习相关的碳足迹降至最低。但学习者也有责任确保他们获取学习的方式也与最低的环境成本相关联。提供者和学习者都应关注可能产生最大影响的活动。这对于面对面教育和数字化学习都很重要。