• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新制备的纳米硅酸三钙-58S生物活性玻璃基根管封闭剂的界面适应性

Interfacial adaptation of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer.

作者信息

Al-Sabawi Nawal A, Al-Jubori Sawsan Hameed

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.

出版信息

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Spring;18(2):115-122. doi: 10.34172/joddd.40729. Epub 2024 Jun 24.

DOI:10.34172/joddd.40729
PMID:39071217
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11282200/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The sealer's interfacial adaptability is one of the critical factors for successful root canal therapy. This study evaluated and compared the interfacial adaptability of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer (C S-BG-P) to root dentin with two bioactive sealers Nishika Canal Sealer BG and BioRoot RCS.

METHODS

Thirty newly extracted single-rooted lower premolars were decoronated and instrumented. The roots were assigned to three groups: C S-BG-P, Nishika Canal Sealer BG, and BioRoot RCS (n=10) and obturated with the single-cone method. Each root was sectioned horizontally to obtain three slices at 2, 5, and 10 mm from the apex. The width of the gaps at the sealer‒dentin interface from each section's mesial and distal sides was measured under a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) at×1.0 using the Digimizer software program. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests for multiple comparisons were used to interpret and analyze the collected data.

RESULTS

The mean gap width at the sealer‒dentin interface of C S-BG-P and Nishika Canal Sealer BG was significantly less than that of BioRoot RCS at all root sections (≤0.05). However, the mean gap width at the sealer‒dentin interface of C S-BG-P was not significantly different from Nishika Canal Sealer BG (>0.05). Moreover, there were greater interfacial gaps at the apical level than at the coronal level for all the tested sealers.

CONCLUSION

C S-BG-P exhibited interfacial adaptation that was nearly comparable to Nishika Canal Sealer BG and superior to BioRoot RCS.

摘要

背景

封闭剂的界面适应性是根管治疗成功的关键因素之一。本研究评估并比较了新制备的基于纳米硅酸三钙-58s生物活性玻璃的牙髓封闭剂(CS-BG-P)与两种生物活性封闭剂Nishika根管封闭剂BG和BioRoot RCS与牙根牙本质的界面适应性。

方法

选取30颗新拔除的单根下颌前磨牙,去除牙冠并进行根管预备。将牙根分为三组:CS-BG-P组、Nishika根管封闭剂BG组和BioRoot RCS组(n = 10),采用单锥法进行根管充填。将每颗牙根水平切片,在距根尖2、5和10 mm处获得三片切片。使用Digimizer软件程序,在×1.0的场发射扫描电子显微镜(FESEM)下测量每个切片近中侧和远中侧封闭剂与牙本质界面处的间隙宽度。采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行多重比较,以解释和分析收集到的数据。

结果

在所有牙根切片中,CS-BG-P和Nishika根管封闭剂BG封闭剂与牙本质界面的平均间隙宽度均显著小于BioRoot RCS(P≤0.05)。然而,CS-BG-P封闭剂与牙本质界面的平均间隙宽度与Nishika根管封闭剂BG无显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,对于所有测试的封闭剂,根尖水平的界面间隙大于冠部水平。

结论

CS-BG-P表现出与Nishika根管封闭剂BG几乎相当且优于BioRoot RCS的界面适应性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/d6824c3bd60d/joddd-18-115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/04274ed007c4/joddd-18-115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/b22bb548c936/joddd-18-115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/ca8071c17082/joddd-18-115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/d6824c3bd60d/joddd-18-115-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/04274ed007c4/joddd-18-115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/b22bb548c936/joddd-18-115-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/ca8071c17082/joddd-18-115-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/d6824c3bd60d/joddd-18-115-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Interfacial adaptation of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer.新制备的纳米硅酸三钙-58S生物活性玻璃基根管封闭剂的界面适应性
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Spring;18(2):115-122. doi: 10.34172/joddd.40729. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Physical-chemical properties and acellular bioactivity of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer.新制备的纳米硅酸三钙-58s生物活性玻璃基根管封闭剂的物理化学性质及无细胞生物活性
J Oral Biosci. 2023 Dec;65(4):305-315. doi: 10.1016/j.job.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
3
Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic-based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study.评价基于生物陶瓷的封闭剂在椭圆形根管中的界面适应性和渗透性:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Microsc Res Tech. 2023 Jul;86(7):754-761. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24323. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
Interfacial adaptation and penetration depth of bioceramic endodontic sealers.生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的界面适应性和渗透深度。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jul-Aug;21(4):373-377. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_64_18.
5
Marginal Adaptation of BioRoot RCS, MTA-Fillapex, EpoxySeal, and Sealapex to Radicular Dentin: An In Vitro Study.BioRoot RCS、MTA-Fillapex、EpoxySeal和Sealapex与根管牙本质的边缘适应性:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 12;16(7):e64380. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64380. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
The effect of bioactive glass-based, bioceramic based and epoxy amine resin based root canal sealers on post-obturation pain: A double blinded randomized controlled trial.基于生物活性玻璃、生物陶瓷和环氧胺树脂的根管封闭剂对根管充填后疼痛的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jun;27(6):591-597. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_115_24. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
7
Properties of BioRoot RCS, a tricalcium silicate endodontic sealer modified with povidone and polycarboxylate.BioRoot RCS 的性能研究,一种用聚维酮和聚羧酸改性的硅酸三钙根管封闭剂。
Int Endod J. 2017 Dec;50 Suppl 2:e120-e136. doi: 10.1111/iej.12856. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Fabrication and characterisation of novel algin incorporated bioactive-glass 58S calcium-silicate-based root canal sealer.新型含藻酸盐的生物活性玻璃58S硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的制备与表征
J Dent Sci. 2023 Apr;18(2):604-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
9
Evaluation of Bond Strength of Four Different Root Canal Sealers.四种不同根管封闭剂的粘结强度评估
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 17;15(14):4966. doi: 10.3390/ma15144966.
10
Comparative evaluation of the effect of calcium silicate and epoxy resinbased root canal sealers on postoperative pain in patients with primary endodontic lesion: A randomized clinical study.硅酸钙和环氧树脂类根管封闭剂对原发性牙髓病变患者术后疼痛影响的比较评价:一项随机临床研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;26(2):194-198. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_602_22. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioceramics in Endodontics: Limitations and Future Innovations-A Review.牙髓病学中的生物陶瓷:局限性与未来创新——综述
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Apr 1;13(4):157. doi: 10.3390/dj13040157.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical-chemical properties and acellular bioactivity of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer.新制备的纳米硅酸三钙-58s生物活性玻璃基根管封闭剂的物理化学性质及无细胞生物活性
J Oral Biosci. 2023 Dec;65(4):305-315. doi: 10.1016/j.job.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
2
Effect of ultrasonic agitation on marginal adaptation, intratubular penetration and bonding strength of calcium-silicate-based endodontic sealers: A laboratory study.超声搅拌对钙硅酸钠基根管封闭剂的边缘适应性、管内渗透和粘结强度的影响:一项实验室研究。
Aust Endod J. 2023 Dec;49(3):690-699. doi: 10.1111/aej.12769. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
3
Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic-based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study.
评价基于生物陶瓷的封闭剂在椭圆形根管中的界面适应性和渗透性:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Microsc Res Tech. 2023 Jul;86(7):754-761. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24323. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Dentinal Tubule Penetration-A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透——体外研究的系统评价
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 29;16(7):2734. doi: 10.3390/ma16072734.
5
Fabrication and characterisation of novel algin incorporated bioactive-glass 58S calcium-silicate-based root canal sealer.新型含藻酸盐的生物活性玻璃58S硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的制备与表征
J Dent Sci. 2023 Apr;18(2):604-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer Reinforced with Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles to Improve Biological Properties.用生物活性玻璃纳米颗粒增强的预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂,以改善生物学性能。
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Sep 8;14(9):1903. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091903.
7
Microscopic evaluation of sealer penetration and interfacial adaptation of three different endodontic sealers: An study.三种不同根管封闭剂的封闭剂渗透及界面适应性的微观评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep-Oct;24(5):435-439. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_392_21. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
8
Impact of Immersion Media on Physical Properties and Bioactivity of Epoxy Resin-Based and Bioceramic Endodontic Sealers.浸液介质对环氧树脂基和生物陶瓷根管封闭剂物理性能及生物活性的影响
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Feb 14;14(4):729. doi: 10.3390/polym14040729.
9
Synthesis and characterization of experimental endodontic sealers containing bioactive glasses particles of NbG or 45S5.合成及特性研究含 NbG 或 45S5 生物活性玻璃颗粒的实验性根管封闭剂。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 Jan;125:104971. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104971. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
10
Influence of obturation technique on penetration depth and adaptation of a bioceramic root canal sealer.根管充填技术对生物陶瓷根管封闭剂渗透深度及适应性的影响
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Sep-Oct;23(5):505-511. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_450_20. Epub 2021 Feb 10.