Suppr超能文献

新制备的纳米硅酸三钙-58S生物活性玻璃基根管封闭剂的界面适应性

Interfacial adaptation of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer.

作者信息

Al-Sabawi Nawal A, Al-Jubori Sawsan Hameed

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.

出版信息

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Spring;18(2):115-122. doi: 10.34172/joddd.40729. Epub 2024 Jun 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The sealer's interfacial adaptability is one of the critical factors for successful root canal therapy. This study evaluated and compared the interfacial adaptability of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer (C S-BG-P) to root dentin with two bioactive sealers Nishika Canal Sealer BG and BioRoot RCS.

METHODS

Thirty newly extracted single-rooted lower premolars were decoronated and instrumented. The roots were assigned to three groups: C S-BG-P, Nishika Canal Sealer BG, and BioRoot RCS (n=10) and obturated with the single-cone method. Each root was sectioned horizontally to obtain three slices at 2, 5, and 10 mm from the apex. The width of the gaps at the sealer‒dentin interface from each section's mesial and distal sides was measured under a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) at×1.0 using the Digimizer software program. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests for multiple comparisons were used to interpret and analyze the collected data.

RESULTS

The mean gap width at the sealer‒dentin interface of C S-BG-P and Nishika Canal Sealer BG was significantly less than that of BioRoot RCS at all root sections (≤0.05). However, the mean gap width at the sealer‒dentin interface of C S-BG-P was not significantly different from Nishika Canal Sealer BG (>0.05). Moreover, there were greater interfacial gaps at the apical level than at the coronal level for all the tested sealers.

CONCLUSION

C S-BG-P exhibited interfacial adaptation that was nearly comparable to Nishika Canal Sealer BG and superior to BioRoot RCS.

摘要

背景

封闭剂的界面适应性是根管治疗成功的关键因素之一。本研究评估并比较了新制备的基于纳米硅酸三钙-58s生物活性玻璃的牙髓封闭剂(CS-BG-P)与两种生物活性封闭剂Nishika根管封闭剂BG和BioRoot RCS与牙根牙本质的界面适应性。

方法

选取30颗新拔除的单根下颌前磨牙,去除牙冠并进行根管预备。将牙根分为三组:CS-BG-P组、Nishika根管封闭剂BG组和BioRoot RCS组(n = 10),采用单锥法进行根管充填。将每颗牙根水平切片,在距根尖2、5和10 mm处获得三片切片。使用Digimizer软件程序,在×1.0的场发射扫描电子显微镜(FESEM)下测量每个切片近中侧和远中侧封闭剂与牙本质界面处的间隙宽度。采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行多重比较,以解释和分析收集到的数据。

结果

在所有牙根切片中,CS-BG-P和Nishika根管封闭剂BG封闭剂与牙本质界面的平均间隙宽度均显著小于BioRoot RCS(P≤0.05)。然而,CS-BG-P封闭剂与牙本质界面的平均间隙宽度与Nishika根管封闭剂BG无显著差异(P>0.05)。此外,对于所有测试的封闭剂,根尖水平的界面间隙大于冠部水平。

结论

CS-BG-P表现出与Nishika根管封闭剂BG几乎相当且优于BioRoot RCS的界面适应性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3e5/11282200/04274ed007c4/joddd-18-115-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验