Pichardo-Rodriguez Rafael, Altuna-Moscoso Valeria, Aviles-Antezana Karen, Cahuana-Mendoza Alondra Lorena, Challco Alvarado Antonio André, Gonzales-Rospigliosi Cristhian, Oscco-Coila Shirley, Rafael-Tarazona Enzo, Saavedra-Velasco Marcos, Cordova-Cueva Liz, De La Cruz-Vargas Jhony A, Munayco-Guillen Fernando, García-Perdomo Herney Andrés
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Biomédicas (INICIB), Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima, Perú.
Instituto Nacional de Oftalmología (INO), Lima, Peru.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Jul 22;15:717-725. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S443710. eCollection 2024.
To determine the quality of systematic reviews submitted as a thesis in the Medical School of Ricardo Palma University.
We conducted a systematic review. We included systematic reviews submitted as theses from Ricardo Palma University, and we excluded narrative reviews, editorials, clinical experiments, and those with incomplete data. We performed a structured search on EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Institutional Repository from the Ricardo Palma University and RENATI. The risk of bias assessment was performed through the AMSTAR-2 and the modified AMSTAR-2 tools. The primary outcome was review quality. A qualitative synthesis of the information was performed.
One thousand four hundred eighty-seven theses were identified, and exclusion criteria were applied, whereby 11 theses were selected for review and thorough consultation. Of the 11 selected theses, and through the AMSTAR-2 and modified AMSTAR-2 tools, the findings reached were that 90.9% of the included theses presented critically low quality that was not modified even when the quality was reevaluated after its publication as a scientific article.
The systematic reviews presented as undergraduate thesis in the Medical School of Ricardo Palma University showed low and critically low quality. Improvement in systematic review training is required for both students and institutional advisors.
确定提交给里卡多·帕尔马大学医学院作为论文的系统评价的质量。
我们进行了一项系统评价。纳入了里卡多·帕尔马大学作为论文提交的系统评价，排除了叙述性综述、社论、临床实验以及数据不完整的那些。我们在EMBASE、PubMed、Scopus以及里卡多·帕尔马大学和RENATI的机构知识库中进行了结构化检索。通过AMSTAR-2和改良的AMSTAR-2工具进行偏倚风险评估。主要结果是综述质量。对信息进行了定性综合。
共识别出1487篇论文，并应用了排除标准，从中选择了11篇论文进行审查和深入咨询。在这11篇选定的论文中，通过AMSTAR-2和改良的AMSTAR-2工具得出的结果是，90.9%的纳入论文质量极低，即使在其作为科学文章发表后重新评估质量时也没有改变。
里卡多·帕尔马大学医学院作为本科论文提交的系统评价质量较低且极低。学生和机构导师都需要改进系统评价培训。
