Suppr超能文献

在清醒镇静和全身麻醉下进行内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗结直肠肿瘤的有效性、安全性和经济成本比较研究。

Comparative Study on the Effectiveness, Safety, and Economic Costs of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors Under Conscious Sedation and General Anesthesia.

机构信息

Endoscopy Center, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Xi'an, China.

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Endoscopy Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Oct 1;34(5):491-496. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001308.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive surgical procedure used for en bloc removal of colorectal tumors. Although colorectal ESD is ideally conducted under conscious sedation, it is often performed under general anesthesia because of its complexity and lengthy duration. Currently, there is limited research on colorectal ESD performed under conscious sedation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and economic cost of colorectal ESD under conscious sedation compared to general anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 301 patients who underwent ESD treatment for colorectal tumors at the Endoscopy Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to November 2020. Patients were divided into the sedation group (group S, n=88) and the general anesthesia group (group A, n=213) based on the anesthetic method. To balance the confounding factors between the 2 groups, 75 matched pairs were obtained after using propensity score matching (PSM). Intraoperative and postoperative parameters were then compared between the matched groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, there was no statistically significant difference between group S and group A in terms of the surgical time, en bloc resection rate, and complete resection rate. There was also no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rates of bleeding, perforation, and post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS) between the 2 groups. However, the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in group S (1.23±0.89d) than in group A (5.92±3.05d) ( P <0.05). The hospitalization costs were also significantly lower in group S (16482.34±13154.32 yuan) compared with group A (34743.74±13779.40 yuan) (P < 0.05 ).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to general anesthesia, performing ESD for colorectal tumors under conscious sedation has equivalent effectiveness and safety while shortening the hospital stay and reducing the economic costs.

摘要

背景

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一种微创外科手术,用于整块切除结直肠肿瘤。尽管结直肠 ESD 理想情况下在清醒镇静下进行,但由于其复杂性和较长的手术时间,通常在全身麻醉下进行。目前,关于清醒镇静下进行的结直肠 ESD 的研究有限。本研究旨在评估与全身麻醉相比,在清醒镇静下进行结直肠 ESD 的有效性、安全性和经济成本。

材料和方法

回顾性分析了 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月期间在北京大学肿瘤医院内镜中心接受 ESD 治疗的 301 例结直肠肿瘤患者。根据麻醉方法将患者分为镇静组(S 组,n=88)和全身麻醉组(A 组,n=213)。为了平衡两组之间的混杂因素,使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)后获得了 75 对匹配组。然后比较匹配组之间的术中及术后参数。

结果

PSM 后,S 组和 A 组在手术时间、整块切除率和完全切除率方面无统计学差异。两组出血、穿孔和 ESD 后电凝综合征(PEECS)的发生率也无统计学差异。然而,S 组的住院时间明显短于 A 组(1.23±0.89d 比 5.92±3.05d)(P<0.05)。S 组的住院费用也明显低于 A 组(16482.34±13154.32 元比 34743.74±13779.40 元)(P<0.05)。

结论

与全身麻醉相比,在清醒镇静下进行结直肠肿瘤 ESD 具有同等的疗效和安全性,同时缩短了住院时间,降低了经济成本。

相似文献

7
Hemoclip-suture-rubber band traction improves efficiency of colonic ESD: a randomized controlled trial.
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jul 30;29(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03194-4.
8
The Comparison Between Low- and High-Concentration Injection Solution Ability for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun;40(6):1419-1427. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16943. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome: a clinical overview.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov-Dec;16(11-12):1079-1087. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2156858. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
3
Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Colorectal Lesions in China.
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 26;2019:6983896. doi: 10.1155/2019/6983896. eCollection 2019.
4
Cost analysis and outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions in an outpatient setting.
Dig Liver Dis. 2019 Mar;51(3):391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.09.023. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
6
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug;31(4):473-480. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
7
Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):74-86.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
8
Colorectal ESD in day surgery.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3690-3695. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5407-7. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
9
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early rectal neoplasia: experience from a European center.
Endoscopy. 2017 Mar;49(3):222-232. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118449. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
10
Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.
Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):829-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392882. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验