Sport Science and R&D Department, Juventus Football Club, Torino, Italy.
School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Human Performance Research Centre, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Aug 1;38(8):e423-e429. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004813.
Connolly, DR, Stolp, S, Gualtieri, A, Ferrari Bravo, D, Sassi, R, Rampinini, E, and Coutts, AJ. How do young soccer players train? A 5-year analysis of weekly training load and its variability between age groups in an elite youth academy. J Strength Cond Res 38(8): e423-e429, 2024-The aim of this study was to quantify the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), duration, and training load accrued across typical training weeks undertaken by youth soccer players. Differences between starters, nonstarters, and variations in training load variables were also investigated. Data were collected from 230 elite youth players in 4 age groups (U15, U16, U17, and U19) during 5 competitive seasons. Mixed models were used to describe variation between age groups and compare starters with nonstarters, with season as a fixed covariate effect. Week-to-week variation in training load was expressed as the percentage coefficient of variation. The main findings may be used to highlight a significant effect of age and playing status on training intensity, duration, and internal training load. Weekly training load increased progressively from the U15 to U17, with significant differences between each age group (p < 0.03). Lower mean weekly perceived intensity (sRPE) was noted in U15 when compared with the older age groups (4.2 vs. 4.6-4.9 arbitrary unit for U16 to U19, p < 0.001). Low weekly training load variation was observed across the different phases of the season in each age group, with the preseason exhibiting the greatest variance (3.6-6.2%). Differences in the training load are likely more attributable to changes in training duration rather than sRPE. Control of session duration seems to play an important role when aiming to control load in the academy environment, and practitioners should closely monitor the differences in duration and load being recorded between starters and nonstarters.
康诺利、DR、斯托尔普、S、瓜尔蒂耶里、A、法拉利·布拉沃、D、萨西、R、兰皮尼尼、E 和考茨、AJ。年轻足球运动员如何训练?一个精英青年学院的 5 年年龄组间每周训练负荷及其变异性分析。J 力量与体能研究 38(8):e423-e429,2024 年——本研究旨在量化青年足球运动员典型训练周所积累的训练课感知体力消耗(sRPE)评分、持续时间和训练负荷。还研究了首发球员和非首发球员之间的差异以及训练负荷变量的变化。数据来自 4 个年龄组(U15、U16、U17 和 U19)的 230 名精英青年球员在 5 个赛季中收集。使用混合模型描述年龄组之间的差异,并比较首发球员和非首发球员,以赛季为固定协变量效应。每周训练负荷的周间变化表示为变异系数的百分比。主要发现可用于强调年龄和比赛状态对训练强度、持续时间和内部训练负荷的显著影响。每周训练负荷从 U15 到 U17 逐渐增加,每个年龄组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.03)。与年龄较大的年龄组相比,U15 的平均每周感知强度(sRPE)较低(4.2 对 U16 至 U19 的 4.6-4.9 任意单位,p < 0.001)。在每个年龄组的赛季不同阶段,每周训练负荷的变化都很小,季前赛的变化最大(3.6-6.2%)。训练负荷的差异可能更多归因于训练持续时间的变化,而不是 sRPE。在学院环境中控制训练持续时间似乎对于控制负荷非常重要,并且从业者应密切监测首发球员和非首发球员之间记录的持续时间和负荷的差异。