Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;90(12):3135-3145. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16183. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
While medication adherence (MA) is a key prerequisite for achieving optimal clinical and economic outcomes, nonadherence is highly prevalent. Assessing how healthcare professionals (HCPs) in Europe manage MA, focusing on measurement, reporting and interventions, is the subject of this study.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 40 European countries and quantitative analysis was conducted via an online survey. The multi-language online survey was created using Webropol 3.0 survey and reporting tool. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests were applied.
In total, 2875 HCPs (pharmacists: 39.9%; physicians: 36.7%; nurses: 16.4%) from 37 European countries participated. The most used methods for MA assessment were direct communication with patients (86.4%) and referring to personal patient records (56.7%) (P < 0.0001). Physicians (74.9%) and nurses (58.8%) were more aware of problems related to MA in contrast to pharmacists (48.6%) (P < 0.001). Almost all HCPs (92.6%) indicated that MA-enhancing interventions involved mainly direct communication with nonadherent patients (93.3%) and their caregivers (55.7%). Medication review and related optimization of therapy were mainly performed in Western European countries (46.8%). Technological solutions were ranked as one of the less applied approaches (10-15%) (P < 0.001).
HCPs in all European regions recognize MA management as an integral element of overall patient-centred care. More efforts are needed to ensure timely, adequate and relevant MA assessment, reporting and improvement and involvement of all HCPs, especially among pharmacists who were generally less aware of MA issues. Promotion and use of digital technological solutions should be the focus of current and future clinical practice to optimize MA management processes.
尽管药物依从性(MA)是实现最佳临床和经济结果的关键前提,但不依从的情况非常普遍。本研究旨在评估欧洲的医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)如何管理 MA,重点关注测量、报告和干预措施。
在欧洲的 40 个国家进行了一项横断面研究,并通过在线调查进行了定量分析。该多语言在线调查使用 Webropol 3.0 调查和报告工具创建。应用描述性统计和卡方检验。
共有来自 37 个欧洲国家的 2875 名 HCPs(药剂师:39.9%;医生:36.7%;护士:16.4%)参与了研究。用于 MA 评估的最常用方法是与患者直接沟通(86.4%)和参考个人患者记录(56.7%)(P < 0.0001)。与药剂师(48.6%)相比,医生(74.9%)和护士(58.8%)更了解与 MA 相关的问题(P < 0.001)。几乎所有 HCPs(92.6%)表示,增强 MA 的干预措施主要涉及与不依从患者(93.3%)及其护理人员(55.7%)进行直接沟通。药物审查和相关治疗优化主要在西欧国家进行(46.8%)。技术解决方案被列为应用较少的方法之一(10-15%)(P < 0.001)。
欧洲所有地区的 HCPs 都认识到 MA 管理是整体以患者为中心护理的一个组成部分。需要做出更多努力,以确保及时、充分和相关的 MA 评估、报告和改进,并让所有 HCPs参与其中,尤其是药剂师,他们普遍对 MA 问题的认识不足。促进和使用数字技术解决方案应成为当前和未来临床实践的重点,以优化 MA 管理流程。