Nephrology Unit, Cardarelli Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
J Nephrol. 2024 Sep;37(7):1827-1832. doi: 10.1007/s40620-024-01996-7. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
In the Western world, thanks to continuous progress in the medical field, and to changes in society, the concept of death seems to be increasingly replaced by that of "keeping alive at all costs". Thus also dialysis, a life-sustaining treatment for patients suffering from kidney failure, in some cases can no longer be seen as a treatment aimed at prolonging life, but as a treatment to temporarily avert death. In fact, the literature highlights that dialysis is not always associated with greater life expectancy and better quality of life for fragile patients with kidney failure. This point-of-view paper discusses legal and ethical principles of respect for patient autonomy (beneficence, non-maleficence, justice and professional integrity) inherent in the choice to suspend or to not start dialysis treatment, while following a pathway of conservative and/or palliative therapy.
在西方世界,由于医学领域的不断进步和社会的变化,死亡的概念似乎越来越被“不惜一切代价维持生命”所取代。因此,透析这种治疗肾衰竭患者的维持生命的治疗方法,在某些情况下不再被视为旨在延长生命的治疗方法,而是被视为暂时避免死亡的治疗方法。事实上,文献强调,透析并不总是与肾衰竭脆弱患者的更高预期寿命和更好的生活质量相关。这篇观点论文讨论了在选择暂停或不开始透析治疗时,尊重患者自主性的法律和伦理原则(有利、不伤害、公正和专业诚信),同时遵循保守和/或姑息治疗的途径。