VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Center for Innovation to Implementation VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, USA; Stanford University School of Medicine, Primary Care and Population Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Oct;145:107643. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107643. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
Goals of care conversations explore seriously ill patients' values to guide medical decision making and often inform decisions about life sustaining treatments. Ideally, conversations occur before a health crisis between patients and clinicians in the outpatient setting. In the United States Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, most conversations still occur in the inpatient setting. Strategies are needed to improve implementation of outpatient, primary care goals of care conversations.
We plan a cluster randomized (clinician-level) sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patient implementation strategies on the outcome of goals of care conversation documentation when delivered in combination with clinician implementation strategies. Across three VA healthcare system sites, we will enroll primary care clinicians with low rates of goals of care conversations and their patients with serious medical illness in the top 10th percentile of risk of hospitalization or death. We will compare the effectiveness of sequences of implementation strategies and explore how patient and site factors modify implementation strategy effects. Finally, we will conduct a mixed-methods evaluation to understand implementation strategy success or failure. The design includes two key innovations: (1) strategies that target both clinicians and patients and (2) sequential strategies with increased intensity for non-responders.
This study aims to determine the effect of different sequences and combinations of implementation strategies on primary care documentation of goals of care conversations. Study partners, including the VA National Center for Ethics in Health Care and Office of Primary Care, can consider policies based on study findings.
旨在探讨重病患者价值观的目标关怀对话,以指导医疗决策,并经常为决定是否进行维持生命的治疗提供信息。理想情况下,这些对话应该在患者和临床医生在门诊环境中发生健康危机之前进行。在美国退伍军人事务部 (VA) 医疗保健系统中,大多数对话仍在住院环境中进行。需要采取策略来改善门诊、初级保健目标关怀对话的实施。
我们计划进行一项基于聚类的随机(临床医生层面)序贯、多次分配随机试验,以评估当与临床医生实施策略一起提供时,患者实施策略对目标关怀对话记录结果的有效性,这些策略在 VA 医疗保健系统的三个地点中,我们将招募低比例进行目标关怀对话的初级保健临床医生及其患有严重疾病的患者,这些患者的住院或死亡风险处于前 10%。我们将比较实施策略序列的有效性,并探讨患者和地点因素如何改变实施策略的效果。最后,我们将进行混合方法评估,以了解实施策略的成功或失败。该设计包括两个关键创新:(1)针对临床医生和患者的策略,以及(2)针对非响应者的策略。
本研究旨在确定不同的实施策略序列和组合对初级保健目标关怀对话记录的影响。研究合作伙伴,包括 VA 国家伦理中心和初级保健办公室,可以根据研究结果考虑相关政策。